Uncertainty based optimal monitoring network design for a chlorinated hydrocarbon contaminated site

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

Volumn 173, Issue 1-4, 2011, Pages 929-940

  Chadalavada, Sreenivasulu ^a,b   Datta, Bithin ^c   Naidu, Ravi ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b University of South Australia and CRC for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment   (Australia)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Genetic algorithm; Groundwater; Pollution source; Simulation optimization

Indexed keywords

BASIC PRINCIPLES; CHLORINATED HYDROCARBON; CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONS; CONTAMINANT PLUME; CONTAMINATED SITE MANAGEMENT; CONTAMINATED SITES; DESIGN CRITERION; ESTIMATION VARIANCE; GEOSTATISTICAL TOOLS; LONG TERM MONITORING; MASS ESTIMATION; MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY; MONITORING NETWORK; MONITORING WELLS; NETWORK DESIGN; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; OPTIMAL LOCATIONS; OPTIMAL NUMBER; POLLUTION SOURCE; POTENTIAL MONITORING; SIMULATION OPTIMIZATION; SPATIAL CONCENTRATION; STUDY AREAS;

CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); CONTAMINATION; DESIGN; ESTIMATION; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; GROUNDWATER; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; HYDROCARBONS; IMPURITIES; OPTIMIZATION; POLLUTION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WELLS;

MONITORING;

CHLORINATED HYDROCARBON; GROUND WATER;

ARTESIAN WELL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DESIGN; GENETIC ALGORITHM; GEOSTATISTICS; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; OPTIMIZATION; POLLUTANT SOURCE; POLLUTION CONTROL; POLLUTION MONITORING; REMEDIATION;

AQUIFER; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BIOREMEDIATION; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GENETIC ALGORITHM; PLUME; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; WATER CONTAMINATION; WATER SAMPLING;

ALGORITHMS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HYDROCARBONS, CHLORINATED; UNCERTAINTY; WATER MOVEMENTS;

EID: 79151479602     PISSN: 01676369     EISSN: 15732959     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-010-1435-2     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. S Chadalavada B Datta 2008 Dynamic optimal monitoring network for transient transport of pollutants in groundwater aquifers Water Resources Management 22 6 651 670 10.1007/s11269-007-9184-x
2. Clark, I. (1979). Practical geostatistics. Essex, England: Applied Science Publishers.
3. N Cressie 1988 Spatial prediction and ordinary kriging Mathematical Geology 20 2 405 421 10.1007/BF00892986
4. K Deb A Pratap S Agarwal T Meyarivan 2002 A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II IEEE Transaction on Evolutionary Computation 6 2 181 197 10.1109/4235.996017
5. A Dhar B Datta 2007 Multiobjective design of dynamic monitoring networks for detection of groundwater pollution Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 133 2 329 338 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2007)133:4(329)
6. Gangolli, S. (1999). The dictionary of substances and their effects. Cambridge, UK: The Royal Society of Chemistry.
7. Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.
8. JB Kollat PM Reed 2006 Comparing state-of art evolutionary multi objective algorithms for long term monitoring network design Advances in Water Resources 29 792 807 10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.07.010
9. H Loaiciga, et al. 1992 Review of ground-water quality monitoring network design Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 118 1 11 37 10.1061/(ASCE)0733- 9429(1992)118:1(11)
10. LM Nunes MC Cunha L Riberio, et al. 2004 Groundwater monitoring network optimization with redundancy reduction Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 130 1 33 43 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:1(33)
11. Parsons and Brinkerhoff (2002). Edinburgh parks environment status report, Australia.
12. P Reed B Minsker 2004 Striking the balance: Long term groundwater monitoring design for conflicting objectives Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 130 1 140 149 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:2(140)
13. Y Wu 2004 Optimal design of a groundwater monitoring network in Daqing, China Environmental Geology 45 527 535 10.1007/s00254-003-0907-x
14. J Wu C Zheng CC Chien L Zheng, et al. 2006 A comparative study of Monto Carlo simple genetic algorithm and noisy genetic algorithm and noisy genetic algorithm for cost-effective sampling network design under uncertainty Advances in Water Resources 29 899 911 10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.08.005