Does objective shoulder impairment explain patient-reported functional outcome? A study of proximal humerus fractures

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 267-272

  Slobogean, Gerard P ^a   Noonan, Vanessa K ^a   Famuyide, Akin ^a   O'Brien, Peter J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Evaluation of a Diagnostic Test; Impairment; Level III; Nonconsecutive Series of Patients; Patient reported outcome; Proximal humerus fracture; Range of motion; Shoulder physical examination

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE STRENGTH; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FRACTURE HEALING; HUMAN; HUMERUS FRACTURE; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANGE OF MOTION; SELF REPORT;

AGED; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROC CURVE; SELF-ASSESSMENT; SHOULDER; SHOULDER FRACTURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79151472271     PISSN: 10582746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Baker P., Nanda R., Goodchild L., Finn P., Rangan A. A comparison of the Constant and Oxford shoulder scores in patients with conservatively treated proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008, 1:37-41. 10.1016/j.jse.2007.04.019.
2. Beaton D.E., Katz J.N., Fossel A.H., Wright J.G., Tarasuk V., Bombardier C. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther 2001, 14:128-146.
3. Beaton D.E., Schemitsch E. Measures of health-related quality of life and physical function. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003, 413:90-105. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000079772.06654.c8.
4. Constant C.R., Gerber C., Emery R.J., Søjbjerg J.O., Gohlke F., Boileau P. A review of the Constant score: modifications and guidelines for its use. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008, 2:355-361. 10.1016/j.jse.2007.06.022.
5. Constant C.R., Murley A.H. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987, 214:160-164.
6. Court-Brown C.M., Garg A., McQueen M.M. The translated two-part fracture of the proximal humerus. Epidemiology and outcome in the older patient. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001, 6:799-804. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.83B6.11401.
7. Dawson J., Fitzpatrick R., Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1996, 78-B:593-600.
8. Dawson J., Rogers K., Fitzpatrick R., Carr A. The Oxford shoulder score revisited. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009, 1:119-123. doi:10.1007/s00402-007-0549-7.
9. Hanson B., Neidenbach P., de Boer P., Stengel D. Functional outcomes after nonoperative management of fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009, 4:612-621. 10.1016/j.jse.2009.03.024.
10. Hunsaker F.G., Cioffi D.A., Amadio P.C., Wright J.G., Caughlin B. The American academy of orthopaedic surgeons outcomes instruments: normative values from the general population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002, 2:208-215.
11. Keener J.D., Parsons B.O., Flatow E.L., Rogers K., Williams G.R., Galatz L.M. Outcomes after percutaneous reduction and fixation of proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007, 3:330-338. 10.1016/j.jse.2006.09.006.
12. Lindenhovius A.L., Buijze G.A., Kloen P., Ring D.C. Correspondence between perceived disability and objective physical impairment after elbow trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90:2090-2097. doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.00793.
13. Lippitt S.B., Harryman D.T., Matsen F.A. A practical tool for evaluating function: the simple shoulder test. The shoulder: a balance of mobility and stability 1993, 501-518. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, IL.
14. MacDermid J.C., Donner A., Richards R.S., Roth J.H. Patient versus injury factors as predictors of pain and disability six months after a distal radius fracture. J Clin Epidemiol 2002, 55:849-854. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00445-6.
15. Mighell M.A., Kolm G.P., Collinge C.A., Frankle M.A. Outcomes of hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2003, 6:569-577. doi:10.1016/S1058-2746(03)00213-1.
16. Palvanen M., Kannus P., Niemi S., Parkkari J. Update in the epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 442:87-92. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000194672.79634.78.
17. Richards R.R., Kai-Nan A., Bigliani L.U., Friedman R.J., Gartsman G.M., Gristina A.G., et al. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1994, 3:347-352. doi:10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80019-0.
18. Robinson C.M., Page R.S. Severely impacted valgus proximal humeral fractures. Results of operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003, 9:1647-1655.
19. Sangha O., Stucki G., Liang M.H., Fossel A.H., Katz J.N. The Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis Rheum 2003, 49:156-163. doi:10.1002/art.10993.
20. Slobogean G.P., Noonan V., O'Brien P.J. The reliability and validity of the DASH, EQ-5D, Health Utilities Index, and SF-6D outcome instruments in patients with proximal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010, 19:342-348. 10.1016/j.jse.2009.10.021.