A genetic algorithm based groundwater simulation-optimization model under variable-density conditions

IAHS-AISH Publication

Volumn , Issue 329, 2009, Pages 223-232

  Lin, Jin ^a,b   Zhang, Jianyun ^a   Zheng, Chunmiao ^b   Liu, Jiufu ^a   Wu, Jianfeng ^c   Yang, Shufeng ^d  

^a NANJING HYDRAULIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

^c NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Genetic algorithm; Groundwater; Optimization algorithm; SWTGA; Variable density flow

Indexed keywords

A-DENSITY; COASTAL AQUIFERS; DECISION MAKERS; DENSITY FLOW; DENSITY-DEPENDENT; EFFECTIVE TOOL; GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT; GROUNDWATER MODELLING; GROUNDWATER PUMPING; GROUNDWATER SIMULATIONS; NEW MODEL; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; OPTIMAL DESIGN; OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS; SUSTAINABLE USE; SWTGA; TRANSITION ZONES;

AQUIFERS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; HYDROGEOLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; WATER MANAGEMENT;

GROUNDWATER RESOURCES;

CONFERENCE PROCEEDING; DECISION MAKING; ESTUARINE FRONT; GENETIC ALGORITHM; GROUNDWATER RESOURCE; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; TRANSITION ZONE; WATER MANAGEMENT;

EID: 78951487286     PISSN: 01447815     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Bakker, M. & Schaars, F. (2003) The Sea Water Intrusion (SWI) Package Manual, version 0.2. University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
2. Bakker, M., Oude Essink, G. H. P. & Langevin, C. D. (2004) The rotating movement of three immiscible fluids-a benchmark problem. J. Hydrol. 287, 270-278.
3. Freeze, R. A. & Gorelick, S. M. (1999) Convergence of stochastic optimization and decision analysis in the engineering design of aquifer remediation. Ground Water 37(6), 934-954.
4. Goldberg, D. E. (1989) Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, New York, USA.
5. Guo, W. & Langevin, C. D. (2002) User's guide to SEA WAT: a computer program for the simulation of three-dimensional variable-density ground-water flow. USGS Open File Report 01-434.
6. Harbaugh, A. W., Banta, E. R., Hill, M. C. & McDonald, M. G. (2000) MODFLOW-2000, the US Geological Survey modular ground-water model - user guide to modularization concepts and the ground-water flow process. US Geol. Survey Open-File Report 00-92.
7. Holland, J. H. (1975) Adaptation in Natural and Artificial System. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
8. Hsiao, C. T. & Chang, L. C. (2005) Optimizing remediation of an unconfined aquifer using a hybrid algorithm. Ground Water 43(6), 904-915.
9. HydroGeoLogic Inc. (2002) MODHMS: MODFLOW-Based Hydrologie Modelling System, Documentation and User's Guide. HydroGeoLogic Inc., Herndon, Virginia, USA.
10. Kipp, K. L. J. (1986) HST3D - A computer code for simulation of heat and solute transport in three-dimensional ground-water flow systems. USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 86-4095.
11. Krishnakumar, K. (1989) Micro-genetic algorithms for stationary and non-stationary function optimization. In: SPIE: Intelligent Control and Adaptive Systems, 289-296. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
12. Langevin, C. D., Shoemaker, W. B. & Guo, W. (2003) MODFLOW-2000, the US Geological Survey Modular Ground-Water Model - Documentation of the SEAWAT-2000 version with the variable-density flow process (VDF) and the integrated MT3DMS Transport Process (IMT). US Geological Survey Open-File Report 03-426.
13. Langevin, C. D. & Guo, W. (2006) MODFLOW/MT3DMS-based simulation of variable-density ground water flow and transport. Ground Water 44(3), 339-351.
14. McDonald, M. G. & Harbaugh, A. W. (1988) A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. US Geological Survey Techniques of Water Resources Investigations Book 6, Chapter A1.
15. Oude Essink, G. H. P. (1998) MOC3D adapted to simulate 3D density-dependent groundwater flow. In: Proc. MODFLOW '98 Conference at the International Ground Water Modelling Center, 291-300. Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, USA.
16. Park, C. H. & Aral, M. M. (2004) Multi-objective optimization of pumping rates and well placement in coastal aquifers. J. Hydrol. 290, 80-99.
17. Sorek, S. & Pinder, G. F. (1999) Survey of computer codes and case histories. In: Seawater Intrusion in Coastal Aquifers: Concepts, Methods, and Practices (ed. by J. Bear, A. H.-D. Cheng, S. Sorek, D. Quazar & I. Herrera). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
18. Voss, C. I. (1984) A finite-element simulation model for saturated-unsaturated, fluid-density-dependent ground-water flow with energy transport or chemically-reactive single-species solute transport. USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 84-4369.
19. Wang, M. & Zheng, C. (1997) Optimal remediation policy selection under general conditions. Ground Water 35(5), 757-764.
20. Xue, Y.-Q., Xie, C.-H., Wu, J.-C, Liu, P.-M. & Shi, H.-W. (1991) Research on the Movement Rule of the Freshwater/Saltwater Interface during Seawater Intrusion. Nanjing University Press, Nanjing, China.
21. Yan, S. & Minsker, B. (2006) Optimal groundwater remediation design using an adaptive neural network genetic algorithm. Water Resources Res. 42(5), W05407.
22. Zheng, C. & Wang, P. P. (1999) MT3DMS: A modular three-dimensional multispecies transport model for simulation of advection, dispersion and chemical reactions of contaminants in ground-water systems; documentation and user's guide. US Army Corps of Engineers Contract Report SERDP-99-1, Vicksburg, Mississippi, USA.
23. Zheng, C. & Wang, P. P. (2002) A field demonstration of the simulation optimization approach for remediation system design. Ground Water 40(3), 258-265.
24. Zheng, C. & Wang, P. P. (2003) MGO - a modular groundwater optimizer incorporating MODFLOW/MT3DMS: Documentation and User's Guide. The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA.