Genetic and environmental effects on piglet survival and maternal behaviour of the farrowing sow

Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Volumn 130, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 28-41

  Baxter, Emma M ^a   Jarvis, Susan ^a   Sherwood, Lorna ^b   Farish, Marianne ^a   Roehe, Rainer ^a   Lawrence, Alistair B ^a   Edwards, Sandra A ^c  

^a SCOTTISH AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

^b SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT   (United Kingdom)

^c NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Environment; Environmental sensitivity; Genotype; Maternal behaviour; Piglet survival

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; BREEDING; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOTYPE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; MATERNAL EFFECT; PIG; REARING; SURVIVAL;

ANIMALIA; SUIDAE;

EID: 78951476825     PISSN: 01681591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2010.11.020     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Ahlstrom S., Jarvis S., Lawrence A.B. Savaging gilts are more restless and more responsive to piglets during the expulsive phase of parturition. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002, 76:83-91.
2. Andersen I.L., Berg S., Boe K.E. Crushing of piglets by the mother sow (Sus scrofa)-purely accidental or a poor mother?. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2005, 93:229-243.
3. Arey D.S. Behavioural observations of peri-parturient sows and the development of alternative farrowing accommodation: a review. Anim. Welf. 1997, 6:217-229.
4. Baxter E.M., Jarvis S., Sherwood L., Robson S.K., Ormandy E., Farish M., Smurthwaite K.M., Roehe R., Lawrence A.B., Edwards S.A. Indicators of piglet survival in an outdoor farrowing system. Livest. Sci. 2009, 124:266-276.
5. Chen C., Gilbert C.L., Yang G., Guo Y., Segonds-Pichon A., Ma J., Evans G., Brenig B., Sargent C., Affara N., Huang L. Maternal infanticide in sows: Incidence and behavioural comparisons between savaging and non-savaging sows at parturition. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2007, 109:238-248.
6. Cox L.N., Cooper J.J. Observations on the pre- and post-weaning behaviour of piglets reared in commercial indoor and outdoor environments. Anim. Sci. 2001, 72:75-86.
7. Cronin G.M., Cropley J.A. The effect of piglet stimuli on the posture changing behaviour of recently farrowed sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1991, 30:167-172.
8. Cronin G.M., Smith J.A. Effects of accommodation type and straw bedding around parturition and during lactation on the behavior of primiparous sows and survival and growth of piglets to weaning. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1992, 33:191-208.
9. Damm B.I., Pedersen L.J., Marchant-Forde J.N., Gilbert C.L. Does feed-back from a nest affect periparturient behaviour, heart rate and circulatory cortisol and oxytocin in gilts?. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003, 83:55-76.
10. Damm B.I., Pedersen L.J., Heiskanen T., Nielsen N.P. Long-stemmed straw as an additional nesting material in modified Schmid pens in a commercial breeding unit: effects on sow behaviour, and on piglet mortality and growth. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2005, 92:45-60.
11. de Jong I.C., Prelle I.T., van de Burgwal J.A., Lambooij E., Korte S.M., Blokhuis H.J., Koolhaas J.M. Effects of environmental enrichment on behavioral responses to novelty, learning, and memory, and the circadian rhythm in cortisol in growing pigs. Physiol. Behav. 2000, 68:571-578.
12. de Jonge F.H., Bokkers E.A.M., Schouten W.G.P., Helmond F.A. Rearing piglets in a poor environment: developmental aspects of social stress in pigs. Physiol. Behav. 1996, 60:389-396.
13. Edwards S.A. Perinatal mortality in the pig: environmental or physiological solutions?. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2002, 78:3-12.
14. Edwards S.A., Fraser D. Housing systems for farrowing and lactation. Pig J. 1997, 39:77-89.
15. Falconer D.S., Mackay T.F.C. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics 1996, Longman Group Ltd.
16. Francis D.D., Champagne F.C., Meaney M.J. Variations in maternal behaviour are associated with differences in oxytocin receptor levels in the rat. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2000, 12:1145-1148.
17. Francis D., Diorio J., Liu D., Meaney M.J. Nongenomic transmission across generations of maternal behavior and stress responses in the rat. Science 1999, 286:1155-1158.
18. Gluckman P.D., Hanson M.A. The Fetal Matrix: Evolution. Development and Disease 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. Grandin T., Deesing M.J. Genetics and animal welfare. Genetics and the Behaviour of Domestic Animals 1998, 319-341. Academic Press, San Diego, California. T. Grandin (Ed.).
20. Grandinson K., Rydhmer L., Strandberg E., Thodberg K. Genetic analysis of on-farm tests of maternal behaviour in sows. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2003, 83:141-151.
21. Harris M.J., Bergeron R., Gonyou H.W. Parturient behaviour and offspring-directed aggression in farmed wild boar of three genetic lines. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2001, 74:153-163.
22. Harris M.J., Li Y.Z., Gonyou H.W. Savaging behaviour in gilts and sows. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2003, 83:819-821.
23. Held S., Mason G., Mendl M. Maternal responsiveness of outdoor sows from first to fourth parities. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2006, 98:216-233.
24. Hutson G.D., Price E.O., Dickenson L.G. The effect of playback volume and duration on the response of sows to piglet distress calls. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1993, 37:31-37.
25. Illmann G., Neuhauserova K., Pokorna Z., Chaloupkova H., Simeckova M. Maternal responsiveness of sows towards piglet's screams during the first 24h postpartum. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2007, 112:248-259.
26. Jarvis S., Lawrence A.B., Mclean K.A., Deans L.A., Chirnside J., Calvert S.K. The effect of environment on behavioural activity. ACTH, beta-endorphin and cortisol in pre-farrowing gilts. Anim. Sci. 1997, 65:465-472.
27. Jarvis S., Mclean K.A., Calvert S.K., Deans L.A., Chirnside J., Lawrence A.B. The responsiveness of sows to their piglets in relation to the length of parturition and the involvement of endogenous opioids. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1999, 63:195-207.
28. Jarvis S., Reed B.T., Lawrence A.B., Calvert S.K., Stevenson J. Peri-natal environmental effects on maternal behaviour, pituitary and adrenal activation, and the progress of parturition in the primiparous sow. Anim. Welf. 2004, 13:171-181.
29. Jarvis S., D'Eath R.B., Fujita K. Consistency of piglet crushing by sows. Anim. Welf. 2005, 14:43-51.
30. Jarvis S., Moinard C., Robson S.K., Baxter E., Ormandy E., Douglas A.J., Seckl J.R., Russell J.A., Lawrence A.B. Programming the offspring of the pig by prenatal social stress: neuroendocrine activity and behaviour. Horm. Behav. 2006, 49:68-80.
31. Jensen P. Behaviour of pigs. The Ethology of Domestic Animals 2002, 159-172. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK. P. Jensen (Ed.).
32. Johnson A.K., Morrow-Tesch J.L., McGlone J.J. Behavior and performance of lactating sows and piglets reared indoors or outdoors. J. Anim. Sci. 2001, 79:2571-2579.
33. Kanis E., De Greef K.H., Hiemstra A., van Arendonk J.A.M. Breeding for societally important traits in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2005, 83:948-957.
34. Kanis E., Van den Belt H., Groen A.F., De Greef K.H. Breeding for improved welfare in pigs: a conceptual framework and its use in practice. Anim. Sci. 2004, 78:315-329.
35. Knap P.W., Merks J.W.M. A note on the genetics of aggressiveness of primiparous sows towards their piglets. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1987, 17:161-167.
36. Kolmodin R., Strandberg E., Jorjani H., Danell B. Selection in the presence of a genotype by environment interaction: Response in environmental sensitivity. Anim. Sci. 2003, 76:375-385.
37. Lawrence A.B., Petherick J.C., Mclean K.A., Deans L.A., Chirnside J., Vaughan A., Clutton E., Terlouw E.M.C. The effect of environment on behavior, plasma-cortisol and prolactin in parturient sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1994, 39:313-330.
38. Løvendahl P., Damgaard L.H., Nielsen B.L., Thodberg K., Su G., Rydhmer L. Aggressive behaviour of sows at mixing and maternal behaviour are heritable and genetically correlated traits. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2005, 93:73-85.
39. Marchant-Forde J.N. Piglet- and stockperson-directed sow aggression after farrowing and the relationship with a pre-farrowing, human approach test. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002, 75:115-132.
40. Marchant J.N., Rudd A.R., Mendl M.T., Broom D.M., Meredith M.J., Corning S., Simmins P.H. Timing and causes of piglet mortality in alternative and conventional farrowing systems. Vet. Rec. 2000, 147:209-214.
41. Meat and Livestock Commission/BPEX, 2000-2009. The Pig Yearbooks 2000-2009.
42. Mignon-Grasteau S., Boissy A., Bouix J., Faure J.M., Fisher A.D., Hinch G.N., Jensen P., Le Neindre P., Mormede P., Prunet P., Vandeputte M., Beaumont C. Genetics of adaptation and domestication in livestock. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2005, 93:3-14.
43. Noldus L.P.J.J., Trienes R.J.H., Hendriksen A.H.M., Jansen H., Jansen R.G. The Observer Video-Pro: new software for the collection, management, and presentation of time-structured data from videotapes and digital media files. Behav. Res. Methods, Instruments Comput. 2000, 32:197-206.
44. Price E.O. Behavioral development in animals undergoing domestication. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1999, 65:245-271.
45. Rauw W.M., Kanis E., Noordhuizen-Stassen E.N., Grommers F.J. Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1998, 56:15-33.
46. Roehe R., Shrestha N.P., Mekkawy W., Baxter E.M., Knap P.W., Smurthwaite K.M., Jarvis S., Lawrence A.B., Edwards S.A. Genetic analyses of piglet survival and individual birth weight on first generation data of a selection experiment for piglet survival under outdoor conditions. Livest. Sci. 2009, 121:173-181.
47. Sellier P., Monin G. Genetics of pig meat quality: a review. J. Muscle Foods 1994, 5:187-219.
48. Špinka M., Illmann G., de Jonge F., Andersson M., Schuurman T., Jensen P. Dimensions of maternal behaviour characteristics in domestic and wildxdomestic crossbred sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2000, 70:99-114.
49. Stolba A., Wood-Gush D.G.M. Arousal and exploration in growing-pigs in different environments. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 1980, 6:382-383.
50. Stolba A., Wood-Gush D.G.M. The assessment of behavioral needs of pigs under free-range and confined conditions. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 1981, 7:388-389.
51. Valros A., Rundgren M., Spinka M., Saloniemi H., Algers B. Sow activity level, frequency of standing-to-lying posture changes and anti-crushing behaviour-within sow-repeatability and interactions with nursing behaviour and piglet performance. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003, 83:29-40.
52. Vangen O., Holm B., Valros A., Lund M.S., Rydhmer L. Genetic variation in sows' maternal behaviour, recorded under field conditions. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2005, 93:63-71.
53. Vieuille C., Berger F., Le Pape G., Bellanger D. Sow behaviour involved in the crushing of piglets in outdoor farrowing huts-a brief report. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003, 80:109-115.
54. Webster S., Dawkins M. The post-weaning behaviour of indoor-bred and outdoor-bred pigs. Anim. Sci. 2000, 71:265-271.
55. Wechsler B., Hegglin D. Individual differences in the behaviour of sows at the nest-site and the crushing of piglets. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1997, 51:39-49.
56. Wechsler B. Rearing pigs in species-specific family groups. Anim. Welf. 1996, 5:25-35.