Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus: Cost-utility of different screening strategies based on a woman's individual risk of disease

Diabetologia

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 256-263

  Round, J A ^a   Jacklin, P ^b   Fraser, R B ^c   Hughes, R G ^d   Mugglestone, M A ^b   Holt, R I G ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cost effectiveness; Cost utility; Gestational diabetes; Risk factors; Screening

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE;

ARTICLE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; ORAL GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREGNANCY DIABETES MELLITUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCREENING TEST; STATISTICAL MODEL; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIABETES, GESTATIONAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; PREGNANCY; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 78951475979     PISSN: 0012186X     EISSN: 14320428     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-010-1881-y     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. WK Nicholson LA Fleisher HE Fox, et al. 2005 Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus: a decision and cost-effectiveness analysis of four screening strategies Diabetes Care 28 1482 1484 10.2337/diacare.28.6.1482 15920072
2. L Hoffman C Nolan JD Wilson J Oats D Simmons 1998 Gestational diabetes mellitus-management guidelines: the Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society Med J Aust 169 93 97 1:STN:280:DyaK1czmsFOjsQ%3D%3D 9700346
3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2001) Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. In: ACOG Practice Bulletin. ACOG, Washington, D.C
4. D Dabelea B Snell CL Hartsfield, et al. 2005 Increasing prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) over time and by birth cohort: Kaiser Permanente of Colorado GDM screening program Diabetes Care 28 579 584 10.2337/diacare.28.3.579 15735191
5. DA Scott E Loveman L McIntyre, et al. 2002 Screening for gestational diabetes: a systematic review and economic evaluation Health Technol Assess 6 1 172 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38nosVSqtw%3D%3D 12433317
6. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 1995 ACOG technical bulletin: diabetes and pregnancy. Number 200 December 1994 Int J Gynecol Obstet 8 331 339
7. The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus 1997 Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus Diabetes Care 20 1183 1197
8. US Preventive Services Task Force (1996) Guide to clinical preventive services: report of the US Preventive Services Task Force. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore
9. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health (2003) Antenatal care: routine care for the health pregnant woman. RCOG Press, London
10. BE Metzger SG Gabbe B Persson, et al. 2010 International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy Diabetes Care 33 676 682 10.2337/dc10-0719 20190296
11. CA Crowther JE Hiller JR Moss, et al. 2005 Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in pregnant women (ACHOIS) trial group. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes N Engl J Med 352 2477 2486 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXltlaksLY%3D 10.1056/NEJMoa042973 15951574
12. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health (2008) Antenatal care: routine care for the health pregnant woman, 2nd edn. RCOG Press, London
13. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health (2008) Diabetes in pregnancy: management of diabetes and its complications from preconception to the postnatal period. RCOG Press, London
14. MB Landon CY Spong E Thom, et al. 2009 A multicenter, randomized trial of treatment for mild gestational diabetes N Engl J Med 361 1339 1348 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXht1Clu7jO 10.1056/NEJMoa0902430 19797280
15. NG Forouhi D Merrick E Goyder, et al. 2006 Diabetes prevalence in England, 2001-estimates from an epidemiological model Diabet Med 23 189 197 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28%2FksFCntw%3D%3D 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01787.x 16433718
16. TA Buchanan AH Xiang RK Peters 2002 Preservation of pancreatic beta-cell function and prevention of type 2 diabetes by pharmacological treatment of insulin resistance in high-risk Hispanic women Diabetes 51 2796 2803 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xmsleru74%3D 10.2337/diabetes.51.9.2796 12196473
17. AJ Reichelt 1998 Fasting plasma glucose is a useful test for the detection of gestational diabetes. Bazilian Study of Gestational Diabetes (EBDG) working group Diabetes Care 21 1246 1249 1:STN:280:DyaK1czmslyjtw%3D%3D 10.2337/diacare.21.8.1246 9702428
18. I Ostlund 2004 Repeated random blood glucose measurements as universal screening test for gestational diabetes mellitus Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83 46 51 14678085
19. V Seshia 2004 Gestational diabetes mellitus in India J Assoc Physicians India 52 707 711
20. Horvath K, Koch K, Jeitler K, et al. (2010) Effects of treatment in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 340:c1395
21. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2007) The guidelines manual. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London. Available from: www.nice.org.uk, accessed 5 August 2010
22. Clements RV (2001) Shoulder dystocia. In: Clements RV (ed) Risk management and litigation in obstetrics and gynaecology. RSM Press in association with RCOG Press, London, pp 224-235
23. Maternal and Child Health Research Consortium (1998) Focus group on shoulder dystocia. In: Confidential enquiries into stillbirths and deaths in infancy. Fifth Annual Report. Maternal and Child Health Research Consortium, London, pp 73-79
24. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Royal College of Medicine (1999) Towards safer childbirth. minimum standards for the organisation of labour wards: report of a joint working party. RCOG Press, London
25. RB Gherman TM Goodwin JG Ouzounian DA Miller RH Paul 1998 Spontaneous vaginal delivery: a risk factor for Erb's palsy? Am J Obstet Gynecol 178 423 427 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7pvV2jug%3D%3D 10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70413-2 9539501
26. PJ Culligan JA Myers RP Goldberg L Blackwell SF Gohmann TD Abell 2005 Elective cesarean section to prevent anal incontinence and brachial plexus injuries associated with macrosomia - a decision analysis Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunc 16 19 28 10.1007/s00192-004-1203-3 discussion 28
27. Drummond MF (2005) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford University Press, Oxford
28. A Blank G Grave BE Metzger 1995 Effects of gestational diabetes on perinatal morbidity reassessed: report of the International Workshop on Adverse Perinatal Outcomes of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus, December 3-4, 1992 Diabetes Care 18 127 129 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3ht1WktQ%3D%3D 7698033
29. M van Leeuwen BC Opmeer EJ Zweers, et al. 2010 Estimating the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a clinical prediction model based on patient characteristics and medical history BJOG 117 69 75 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009. 02425.x 20002371
30. B Poncet L Rocher 2002 Cost-effectiveness analysis of gestational diabetes mellitus screening in France Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 103 122 129 10.1016/S0301-2115(02)00042-8 12069733
31. CG Di I Casadidio 2002 Universal screening and intensive metabolic management of gestational diabetes: cost-effectiveness in Italy Acta Diabetol 39 69 73 10.1007/s005920200016
32. BD Reed 1984 Screening for gestational diabetes - analysis by screening criteria J Fam Pract 19 751 755 1:STN:280:DyaL2M%2Fls1Orsw%3D%3D 6502080
33. C Massion PJ O'Connor R Gorab, et al. 1987 Screening for gestational diabetes in a high-risk population J Fam Prac 25 569 575 1:STN:280: DyaL1c%2FmtFWhuw%3D%3D
34. JP Lavin TP Barden M Miodovnik 1981 Clinical experience with a screening program for gestational diabetes Am J Obstet Gynecol 141 491 494 1:STN:280:DyaL38%2FktlGhsg%3D%3D 7294074
35. B Larijani A Hossein-nezhad AR Vassigh 2004 Effect of varying threshold and selective versus universal strategies on the cost in gestational diabetes mellitus Arch Iranian Med 7 267 271
36. Curtis L (2009) Unit costs of health and social care. Personal and Social Services Research Unit. University of Kent at Canterbury, Canterbury
37. British National Formulary (2006) Joint Formulary Committee. British National Formulary, British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, London
38. Department of Health (2008/09) Department of Health: NHS Reference Costs. Available from www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/ PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH-111591, accessed 22 April 2010.
39. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health (2008) Induction of labour, 2nd edn. RCOG Press, London
40. Department of Health (2008-2009) Department of Health: National Tariff 2008/09. Available from www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/ PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH-081096, accessed 22 April 2010
41. CA Meads JS Cnossen S Meher, et al. 2008 Methods of prediction and prevention of pre-eclampsia: systematic reviews of accuracy and effectiveness literature with economic modelling Health Technol Assess 12 iii iv 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c7ntlSltA%3D%3D 1-270
42. B Persson M Stangenberg U Hansson, et al. 1985 Gestational diabetes mellitus. Comparative evaluation of treatment regimes, diet versus insulin and diet Diabetes 34 101 104 10.2337/diabetes.34.2.101 3888734
43. O Langer D Conway M Berkus, et al. 2000 A comparison of glyburide and insulin in women with gestational diabetes mellitus N Engl J Med 343 1134 1138 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXnsleqsro%3D 10.1056/NEJM200010193431601 11036118