A gradient approximation approach for adjusting temporal origin-destination matrices

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 270-282

  Cipriani, Ernesto ^a   Florian, Michael ^b   Mahut, Michael ^c   Nigro, Marialisa ^a  

^a ROMA TRE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c INRO Consultants   (Canada)

Author keywords

Demand adjustment; Dynamic traffic assignment; SPSA

Indexed keywords

OPTIMIZATION; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

DEMAND ADJUSTMENT; DYNAMIC TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT(DTA); DYNAMIC TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS; GRADIENT APPROXIMATION; ORIGIN DESTINATION MATRICES; SIMULTANEOUS PERTURBATION; SIMULTANEOUS PERTURBATION STOCHASTIC APPROXIMATION; SPSA;

TRAFFIC CONTROL;

DEMAND ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; STOCHASTICITY; TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; TRAVEL DEMAND;

EID: 78951471111     PISSN: 0968090X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2010.05.013     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Ashok, K., 1996. Estimation and prediction of time-dependent origin-destinations flows. PHD thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
2. Balakrishna, R., 2006. Off-line calibration of dynamic traffic assignment models. PHD thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
3. Bierlaire M., Crittin F. An efficient algorithm for real-time estimation and prediction of dynamic od tables. Operations Research 2004, 52(1):116-127.
4. Cascetta E. Transportation Systems Engineering: Theory and Methods 2001, Kluwer Academic Publisher.
5. Cascetta E., Russo F. Calibrating aggregate travel demand models with traffic counts: estimators and statistical performance. Transportation 1997, 24:271-293.
6. Cascetta E., Inaudi D., Marquis G. Dynamic estimators of origin-destination matrices using traffic counts. Transportation Science 1993, 27(4):363-373.
7. Cipriani, E., Florian, M., Mahut, M., Nigro, M., 2008. Investigating the efficiency of a gradient approximation approach for solution of dynamic demand estimation problem. DTA Symposium, Leuven.
8. Cipriani, E., Fusco, G., Gori, S., Petrelli, M., 2006. Heuristic methods for the optimal location of road traffic monitoring stations. In: Proceedings of 9th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. Toronto, Canada, September 2006, pp. 1072-1077.
9. Eisenman, S.M., List, G.F., 2004. Using probe data to estimate OD Matrices. In: Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference. Washington, DC October 3-6, pp. 291-296.
10. Florian, M., Mahut, M., Tremblay, N., 2006. A simulation-based dynamic traffic assignment model: Dynameq. In: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Dynamic Traffic Assignment DTA2006. Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds.
11. Kattan L., Abdulhai B. Non iterative approach to dynamic traffic origin/destination estimation using parallel evolutionary algorithms. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2006, 1964/2006:201-210.
12. Spall J.C. An overview of the simultaneous perturbation method for efficient optimization. Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest 1998, 19(4):482-492.
13. Spall J.C. Implementation of the simultaneous perturbation algorithm for stochastic optimization. IEEE Transactions on aerospace and electronic systems 1998, 34(3).
14. Van der Zijpp, N.J., 1996. Dynamic origin-destination matrix estimation on motorway networks. PhD thesis. Delft University of Technology. Department of Civil Engineering.
15. Zhou X., Mahmassani H.S. Dynamic origin-destination demand estimation using automatic vehicle identification data. IEEE Transactions on intelligent transportation systems 2006, 7(1):105-114.