Collecting drug use data from different populations

Epidemiology of Drug Abuse

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 99-111

  Adlaf, Edward M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78751705279     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/0-387-24416-6_7     Document Type: Chapter

References (93)

1. Abdullah, A.S., Fielding, R., and Hedley, A.J. (2002). Patterns of cigarette smoking, alcohol use and other substance use among Chinese university students in HongKong. American Journal of Addiction 11(3), pp. 235-246.
2. Adamson, S. and Sellman, J. (2003). A prototype screening instrument for cannabis use disorder: The Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test (CUDIT) in an alcohol-dependent clinical sample. Drug and Alcohol Review, 22(3), pp. 309-315.
3. Adlaf, E.M., Gliksman, L., Demers, A., and Newton-Taylor, B. (2003). Illicit drug use among Canadian university undergraduates. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 35(1), pp. 24-43.
4. Adlaf, E.M., and Paglia, A. (2003). Drug Use Among Ontario Students: Detailed OSDUS Findings, 1977-2001: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto.
5. Adler, P. (1990). Ethnographic research on hidden populations: Penetrating the Drug World. In: E. Lambert (Ed.), The Collection and Interpretation of Data from Hidden Populations. NIDA Monograph 98. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD.
6. American Psychological Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.
7. Anderman, C., Cheadle, A., Curry, S., Diehr, P., Shultz, L., and Wagner, E. (1995). Selection bias related to parental consent in school-based research. Evaluation Review, 19, pp. 663-674.
8. Aquilino, W.S. (1992). Telephone versus face-to-face interviewing for household drug use surveys. International Journal of Addictions, 27, pp. 71-91.
9. Aquilino, W.S. (1994). Interview mode effects in surveys of drug and alcohol use: A field experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58, pp. 210-240.
10. Babor, T.R., Higgins-Biddle, J.C., Saunders, J.B., and Monteiro, M.G. (2001). The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Guidelines for Use in Primary Care. World Health Organization, Geneva.
11. Becker, H.S. (1953). Becoming a marijuana user. American Journal of Sociology, 54, pp. 235-242.
12. Bell, R., Wechsler, H., and Johnston, L.D. (1997). Correlates of college student marijuana use: Results of a US National Survey. Addiction, 92(5), pp. 571-581.
13. Biernacki, P. (1986). Pathways from Heroin Addiction. Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
14. Bongers, I.M.B. and van Oers, J.A.M. (1998). Mode effects on self-reported alcohol use and problem drinking: Mail questionnaires and personal interviewing compared. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 59, pp. 280-285.
15. Brener, N., Billy, J., and Grady, W. (2003). Assessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health-risk behavior among adolescents: Evidence from the scientific literature. Journal of Adolescent Health, 33(6), pp. 436-457.
16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2004. About the BRFSS (October 2004); http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/about.htm.
17. Couper, M.P. (2000). Web surveys: A review of issues and approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, pp. 464-494.
18. de Leeuw, E.D., and van der Zouwen, J. (1988). Data quality in telephone and face-to-face surveys: A comparative meta-Analysis. In: R. M. Groves, P. Biemer, L. Lyberg, J. L. Massey, W. Nicholls II, and J. Waksberg (Eds.), Telephone Survey Methodology. Wiley, New York.
19. Dent, C.W., Galaif, J., Sussman, S., Stacy, A., Burton, D., and Flay, B.R. (1993). Demographic, psychosocial and behavioral differences in samples of actively and passively consented adolescents. Addictive Behaviors, 18, pp. 51-56.
20. Dent, C.W., Sussman, S., and Stacy, A. (1997). The impact of a written parental consent policy on estimates from a school-based drug use survey. Evaluation Review, 21, pp. 698-712.
21. Erickson, P., Adlaf, E.M., Smart, R.G., and Murray, G.F. (1994). The Steel Drug: Cocaine and Crack in Perspective. Lexington Books, New York.
22. Faugier, J. and Sargeant, M. (1997). Sampling hard to reach populations. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, pp. 790-797.
23. French, J. (1993). Pipe dreams: Crack and the life in Philadelphia and Newark. In: M. Ratner (Ed.), Crack Pipe as Pimp. Lexington Books, New York.
24. Gfroerer, J. (1985). Influences of Privacy on Self-Reported Drug Use by Youths. In: B.A. Rouse, N.J. Kozel, and L. G. Richards (Eds.), Self-Report Methods of Estimating Drug Use. NIDA Research Monograph 57. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville.
25. Gfroerer, J. and Hughes, A.L. (1992). Collecting data on illicit drug use by phone. In: C.F. Turner, J.T. Lessler, and J.C. Gfroerer (Eds.), Survey Measurement of Drug Use: Methodological Studies. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C.
26. Gfroerer, J., Wright, D., and Kopstein, A. (1997). Prevalence of youth substance use: The impact of methodological differences between two national surveys. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 47, pp. 19-30.
27. Gfroerer, J.C., and Hughes, A.L. (1991). The feasibility of collecting drug abuse data by telephone. Public Health Rep, 106(4), pp. 384-393.
28. Gliksman, L., Demers, A., Adlaf, E.M., Newton-Taylor, B., and Schmidt, K. (2000). Canadian Campus Survey 1998. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto.
29. Goode, E. (1970). The Marihuana Smokers. Basic Books, New York.
30. Goodman, L. (1961). Snowball sampling. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32, pp. 245-268.
31. Gribble, J., Miller, H., Catania, J., Pollack, L., and Turner, C.F. (2000). The impact of T-ACASI interviewing on reported drug use among men who have sex with men. Substance Use and Misuse, pp. 869-890.
32. Griffiths, P., Gossop, M., Powis, B., and Strang, J. (1993). Reaching hidden populations of drug users by privileged access interviews: methodological and practical issues. Addiction, 88, pp. 1617- 1626.
33. Griffiths, P., and McKetin, R. (2003). Developing a global perspective on drug consumption patterns and trends-the challenge for drug epidemiology. Bulletin on Narcotics, LV(1 and 2), pp. 1-8.
34. Groves, R.M., Fowler, F.J., Couper, M.P., Lepkowski, J.M., Singer, E., and Tourangeau, R. (2004). Survey Methodology. Wiley, New York.
35. Grulich, A., de Visser, R., Smith, A., Rissel, C., and Richters, J. (2003). Sex in Australia: Injecting and sexual risk behaviour in a representative sample of adults. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 27(2), pp. 242-250.
36. Guttmacher, S., Weitzman, B.C., Kapadia, F., and Weinberg, S.L. (2002). Classroom-based surveys of adolescent risk-taking behaviors: Reducing the bias of absenteeism. Amercian Journal of Public Health, 92(2), pp. 235-237.
37. Hall, W., Carless, J., Homel, P., Flaherty, B., and Reilly, C. (1991). The characteristics of cocaine users among young adults in Sydney. Medical Journal of Australia, 155, pp. 11-14.
38. Hallfors, D. and Iritani, B. (2002). Local and state school-based substance use surveys. Evaluation Review, 25(4), pp. 418-437.
39. Harrington, K., Binkley, D., Reynolds, K., Duvall, R., Copeland, J., Franklin, F., and Raczynski, J. (1997). Recruitment issues in school-based research: Lessons learned from the High 5 Alabama Project. Journal of School Health, 67, pp. 415-421.
40. Heckathorn, D. (1997). Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 44, pp. 174-199.
41. Hendricks, V. and Blanken, P. (1992). Snowball sampling: Theoretical and practical considerations. In V. Hendricks and P. Blanken (Eds.), Snowball Sampling: A Pilot Study on Cocaine Use. IVO, Rotterdam.
42. Henry, K.L., Smith, E.A., and Hopkins, A. (2002). The effect of active parental consent on the ability to generalize the results of an alcohol, tobacco, and other drug prevention trial to rural adolescents. Evaluation Review, 26(6), pp. 645-655.
43. Hibell, B., Andersson, B., Ahlstrom, S., Balakireva, O., Bjarnason, T., Kokkevi, A., and Morgan, M. (2000). The 1999 ESPAD Report: Alcohol and Other Drug Use Among Students in 30 European Countries. Stockholm: The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and Other Drugs; The Pompidou Group at the Council of Europe.
44. Inciardi, J. (1993). Kingrats, chicken heads, slow necks, freaks and blood suckers: A glimpse at the Miami sex-for-crack market. In: M. Ratner (Ed.), Crack Pipe as Pimp. Lexington, New York.
45. Johnson, T.P. and Mott, J.A. (2001). The reliability of self-reported age of onset of tobacco, alcohol and illicit drug use. Addiction, 96, pp. 1187-1198.
46. Johnston, L.D. and O'Malley, P.M. (1985). Issues of validity and population coverage in student surveys of drug use. In: B. A. Rouse, N. J. Kozel, and L. G. Richards (Eds.), Self-Report Methods Of Estimating Drug Use: Meeting Current Challenges to Validity. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C.
47. Johnston, L.D., O'Malley, P.M., and Bachman, J.G. (2002). Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2001. Volume I: Secondary School Students. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD.
48. Johnston, L.D., O'Malley, P.M., Bachman, J.G., and Schulenberg, J.E. (2004). Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2003. Volume I: Secondary School Students. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD.
49. Kerber, L., and Wallisch, L. (1999). 1997 Texas Survey of Substance Use Among University Students. Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse. Austin, Texas.
50. Kilpatrick, D., Ruggiero, K., Acierno, R., Saunders, B., Resnick, H., and Best, C. (2003). Violence and risk of PTSD. major depression, substance abuse/dependence, and comorbidity: Results from the National Survey of Adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(4), pp. 692-700.
51. Lambert, E. (1990). The Collection and Interpretation of Data from Hidden Populations. NIDA Monograph 98. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville.
52. Lindesmith, R. (1947). Opiate Addiction. Principa Press, Bloomington.
53. MacNeil, P. and Webster, I. (1997). Canada's Alcohol and Other Drugs Survey 1994: A Discussion of the Findings, Canada's Alcohol and Other Drugs Survey 1994: A Discussion of the Findings. Minister of Public Works and Government and Services Canada, Ottawa.
54. Mangione, T., Hingson, R., and Barrett, J. (1982). Collecting sensitive data: A comparison of three survey strategies. Sociological Methods and Research, 10, pp. 337-346.
55. Mangweth, B., Pope, H.G., Ionescu-Pioggia, M., Kinzl, J., and Biebl, W. (1997). Drug use and lifestyle among college students in Austria and the United States. Substance Use and Misuse, 32(4), pp. 461- 473.
56. Martinez, J.M., Carmen Del Rio, M.d., Lopez, N., and Alvarez, F.J. (1999). Illegal drug-using trends among students in a Spanish University in the last decade (1984-1994). Substance Use and Misuse, 34(9), pp. 1281-1297.
57. McCabe, S.E., Boyd, C.J., Couper, M.P., Crawford, S., and D'Arcy, H. (2002). Mode effects for collecting alcohol and other drug use data: Web and U.S. mail. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63, pp. 755-761.
58. Medina-Mora, M.E., Castro, S., Campillo-Serrano, C., and Gomez-Mont, F. (1981). Validity and reliability of a high school drug use questionnaire among Mexican students. Bulletin on Narcotics, 33(4), pp. 67-76.
59. Meilman, P., Gaylor, M., Turco, J., and Stone, J. (1990). Drug use among college undergraduates: Current use and 10 year trends. International Journal of the Addictions, 25, pp. 1025-1036.
60. Midanik, L. and Greenfield, T. (2003). Telephone versus in-person interviews for alcohol use: Results of the 2000 National Alcohol Survey. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 72(3), pp. 209-214.
61. Miller, E.T., Neal, D.J., Roberts, L.J., Baer, J.S., Cressler, S.O., Metrik, J., and Marlatt, A.T. (2002). Test-retest reliability of alcohol measures: Is there a difference between internet-based assessment and traditional methods? Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16(1), pp. 56-63.
62. Mohler-Kuo, M., Lee, J., and Wechsler, H. (2003). Trends in marijuana and other illicit drug use among college students: Results from the 4 Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study Surveys: 1993-2001. Journal of American College Health, 52(1), pp. 17-24.
63. Murphy, S.B., Reinarman, C., and Waldorf, D. (1989). An 11-year follow-up of a network of cocaine users. British Journal of Addictions, 84, pp. 427-436.
64. O'Donnell, L., Duran, R., San Doval, A., Breslin, M., Juhn, G., and Stueve, A. (1997). Obtaining written parent permission for school-based health surveys of urban young adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 21(6), pp. 376-383.
65. O'Malley, P.M. and Johnston, L.D. (2002). Epidemiology of Alcohol and Other Drug Use among American College Students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Supplement No. 14, pp. 23-39.
66. O'Malley, P.M., Johnston, L.D., Bachman, J.G., and Schulenberg, J. (2000). Comparison of confidential versus anonymous survey procedures: Effects on reporting of drug use and related attitudes and beliefs in a national study of students. Journal of Drug Issues, 30(1), pp. 35-54.
67. Pealer, L. and Weiler, R. (2003). Guidelines for designing a web-delivered college health risk behavior survey: Lessons learned from the University of Florida Health Behavior Survey. Health Promotion Practice, 4(2), pp. 171-179.
68. Pope, H.G. Jr., Ionescu-Pioggia, M., and Pope, K.W. (2001). Drug use and life style among college undergraduates: A 30-year longitudinal study. Am J Psychiatry, 158(9), pp. 1519-1521.
69. Prendergast, M.L. (1994). Substance use and abuse among college students: A review of recent literature. Journal of American College Health, 43(3), pp. 99-113.
70. Rootman, I. and Smart, R.G. (1985). A comparison of alcohol, tobacco and drug use as determined from household and school surveys. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 16, pp. 89-94.
71. Schober, S., Caces, M., Pergamit, M., and Branden, L. (1992). Effects of mode of administration on reporting of drug use in the National Longitudinal Survey. In: C.F. Turner, J.T. Lessler, and J. Gfroerer (Eds.), Survey Measurement of Drug Use: Methodological Studies. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD.
72. Severson, H. and Ary, D.V. (1983). Sampling bias due to consent procedures with adolescents. Addictive Behaviors, 8, pp. 433-437.
73. Smart, R.G., Hughes, P.H., Johnston, L.D., Anumonye, A., Khant, U., Medina Mora, M.E., Navaratnam, V., Poshyachinda, V., Varma, V.K., andWadud, K.A. (1980). A Methodology for Student Drug-Use Surveys. World Health Organization, Geneva.
74. Smart, R.G. and Ogborne, A.C. (2000). Drug use and drinking among students in 36 countries. Addictive Behaviors, 25(3), pp. 455-460.
75. Strote, J., Lee, J.E., and Wechsler, H. (2002). Increasing MDMA use among college students: results of a national survey. Journal of Adolescent Health, 30(1), pp. 64-72.
76. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2004). Results from the 2003 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings, SAMHSA, Rockville, MD.
77. Sudman, S. (2001). Examining substance abuse data collection methodologies. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(3), pp. 695-716.
78. Sudman, S., Sirken, M.G., and Cowan, C. (1988). Sampling rare and elusive populations. Science, 240, pp. 991-996.
79. Sykes, W., and Collins, M. (1988). Effects of mode of interview: Experiments in the UK. In R.M. Groves, P. Biemer, L. Lyberg, J.L. Massey, W. Nicholls II, and J.Waksberg (Eds.), Telephone Survey Methodology. Wiley, New York.
80. Topp, L., Barker, B., and Degenhardt, L. (2004). The external validity of results derived from ecstasy users recruited using purposive sample strategies. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 73, pp. 33-40.
81. Turner, C.F., Lessler, J.T., and Devore, J. (1992). Effects of mode of administration and wording on reporting of drug use. In: C.F. Turner, J.T. Lessler, and J. Gfroerer (Eds.), Survey Measurement of Drug Use: Methodological Studies. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville.
82. Turner, C.F., Lessler, J.T., and Gfroerer, J.C. (1992). Survey Measurement of Drug Use: Methodological Studies, Survey Measurement of Drug Use: Methodological Studies. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C.
83. Turner, C.F., Miller, H., Smith, T., Cooley, P., and Rogers, S. (1996). Telephone audio computer-Assisted self-interviewing (T-ACASI) and survey measurements of sensitive behaviors: Preliminary results. In R. Banks, J. Fairgrieve, and L. Gerrard (Eds.), Survey and Statistical Computing 1996. Association for Survey Computing, Chesham, UK.
84. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2003). Conducting School Surveys on Drug Abuse: Global Assessment Programme on Drug Abuse: Toolkit Module 3. United Nations, New York.
85. Wallisch, L.D. (2001). 2000 Texas Survey of Substance Use Among Adults. Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse. Austin, Texas.
86. Webb, E.A., Ashtoa, C.H., Kelly, P. and Kamali, F. (1996). Alcohol and drug use in UK university students. Lancet, 348(9032), pp. 922-925.
87. White, V.M., Hill, D.J., and Effendi, Y. (2004). How does active parental consent influence the findings of drug-use surveys in schools? Evaluation Review, 28(3), pp. 246-260.
88. WHO ASSIST Working Group (2002). Alcohol, smoking and substance involvement screening test (ASSIST): Development, reliability and feasibility. Addiction, 97(9), pp. 1183-1194.
89. Wiebel, W. (1990). Identifying and gaining access to hidden populations. In: E. Lambert (Ed.), The Collection and Interpretation of Data from Hidden Populations. NIDA Monograph 98. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD.
90. Wilkins, C., Bhatta, K., Pledger, M., and Casswell, S. (2003). Ecstasy use in New Zealand: findings from the 1998 and 2001 National Drug Surveys. New Zealand Medical Journal, 116, U383.
91. Williams, T. (1989). The Cocaine Kids: The Inside Story of a Teenage Drug Ring. Addison-Wesley Publishing, New York.
92. Wright, D.L., Aquilino, W.S., and Supple, A. (1998). A comparison of computer-Assisted and paperand- pencil self-Administered questionnaires in a survey of smoking, alcohol and other drug use. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, pp. 331-353.
93. Zinberg, N.E. (1984). Drug, Set and Setting: The Basis for Controlled Intoxicant Use. Yale University Press, New Haven.