A symmetrical Waxholm canonical mouse brain for NeuroMaps

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Volumn 195, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 170-175

  Bowden, Douglas M ^a   Johnson, G Allan ^b   Zaborsky, Laszlo ^c   Green, William D K ^d   Moore, Eider ^e   Badea, Alexandra ^b   Dubach, Mark F ^a   Bookstein, Fred L ^d,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^e NONE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Canonical brain atlas; Image processing; Neuroinformatics; NeuroMaps; Warping; Waxholm space

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HISTOLOGY; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MOUSE; NEUROANATOMY; NEUROMAPS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HEMISPHERE;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL;

EID: 78751703049     PISSN: 01650270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.11.028     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. AIBS Allen reference atlas 2010, Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, [5 August, 2010]. http://mouse.brain-map.org/viewImage.do%3FimageId=130958.
2. Bookstein F.L. Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology 1991, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
3. Bookstein F.L., Green W.D.K. Edgewarp users manual 2002, EWSH3.19, Seattle, [15 August 2010]. ftp://brainmap.stat.washington.edu/edgewarp3.
4. Bookstein F.L., Sampson P.D., Connor P.D., Streissguth A.P. The midline corpus callosum is a neuroanatomical focus of fetal alcohol damage. The Anatomical Record - The New Anatomist 2002, 269:162-174.
5. Bowden D.M. History of brain atlases for nonhuman primates. Primate brain maps 2000, 1-12. Elsevier, Amsterdam. R.F. Martin, D.M. Bowden (Eds.).
6. Bowden D.M. Atlases for informatics and quantitative neuroanatomy. Primate brain maps 2000, 13-22. Elsevier, Amsterdam. R.F. Martin, D.M. Bowden (Eds.).
7. BrainInfo A portal to neuroanatomical information on the Web 2009, University of California at San Diego (UCSD) and International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility (INCF), San Diego, [25 May 2010]. http://braininfo.org/.
8. CIVM Website of Center for In-Vivo Microscopy 2010, Duke University, Durham, [15 August 2010]. http://www.civm.duhs.duke.edu/WHS.
9. Cox R.W. Brief official definition of the nifti1 header 2007, US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, [3 August 2010]. http://nifti.nimh.nih.gov/pub/dist/src/niftilib/nifti1.h.
10. DeQuardo J.R., Bookstein F.L., Green W.D.K., Brundberg J.A., Tandon R. Spatial relationships of neuroanatomic landmarks in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 1996, 67:81-95.
11. EVAN EVAN toolbox 2010, Website of the European Virtual Anthropology Network - Society e.V., [10 November 2010]. http://www.evan-society.org/node/23.
12. Harwylycz M. The INCF digital atlasing program: report on digital atlasing standards in the rodent brain. INCF Secretariat 2009, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm. http://www.incf.org/documents/WHS-Report-Web.pdf.
13. Hof P.R., Young W.G., Bloom F.E., Belichenko P.V., Celio M.R. Comparative cytoarchitectonic atlas of the C57BL/6 and 129/Sv mouse brains 2000, Elsevier, Amsterdam, p. 47.
14. Johnson G.A., Ali-Sharief A., Badea A., Brandenburg J., Cofer G., Fubara B., et al. High-throughput morphologic phenotyping of the mouse brain with magnetic resonance histology. Neuroimage 2007, 37(1):82-89.
15. Johnson G.A., Badea A., Brandenburg J., Cofer G., Fubara B., Liu S., et al. Space: an image-based reference for coordinating mouse brain research. Neuroimage 2010, 53(2):365-372.
16. Ma Y., Hof P.R., Grant S.C., Blackband S.J., Bennett R., Slatest L., et al. A three-dimensional digital atlas database of the adult C57BL/6J mouse brain by magnetic resonance microscopy. Neuroscience 2005, 135:1203-1215.
17. Mitteroecker P., Gunz P., Bernhard M., Schaefer K., Bookstein F.L. Comparison of cranial ontogenetic trajectories among hominoids. Journal of Human Evolution 2004, 46:679-698.
18. Moore E.B., Poliakov A.V., Lincoln P., Brinkley J.F. MindSeer: a portable and extensible tool for visualization of structural and functional neuroimaging data. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8:389.
19. NeuroMaps BrainInfo 2010, Website of the University of California at San Diego (UCSD) and International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility (INCF), San Diego. http://braininfo.rprc.washington.edu/MapViewData.aspx.
20. Paxinos G., Franklin G.A. The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates 2001, Academic Press, New York. second ed.
21. Rorden C. MRIcro Freeware Image Processing Program 2010, [14 August 2010]. http://cnl.web.arizona.edu/mricro.htm.
22. Sharief A.A., Badea A., Dale A.M., Johnson G.A. Automated segmentation of the actively stained mouse brain using multi-spectral MR microscopy. Neuroimage 2008, 39:136-145.
23. Toga A.W. Brain warping 1999, Academic Press, San Diego, p. 311.