Detection of diethylene glycol adulteration in propylene glycol-Method validation through a multi-instrument collaborative study

Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis

Volumn 54, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1001-1006

  Li, Xiang ^a,b   Arzhantsev, Sergey ^a   Kauffman, John F ^a   Spencer, John A ^a  

^a CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Diethylene glycol; Hand held instruments; Near infrared transmission; Partial least squares; Propylene glycol

Indexed keywords

DIETHYLENE GLYCOL; PROPYLENE GLYCOL; WATER;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CHEMOMETRIC ANALYSIS; DRUG CONTAMINATION; ERROR; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; LIMIT OF DETECTION; LIMIT OF QUANTITATION; NEAR INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPECTROMETER; STANDARDIZATION; VALIDATION PROCESS;

CALIBRATION; DRUG CONTAMINATION; ETHYLENE GLYCOLS; EXCIPIENTS; LIMIT OF DETECTION; MODELS, CHEMICAL; PROPYLENE GLYCOL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPECTROSCOPY, NEAR-INFRARED; WATER;

EID: 78751702265     PISSN: 07317085     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2010.11.042     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. U.S.FDA Inactive Ingredients Database 2010, U.S. FDA.
2. Wade A., Weller P.J. Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients 1994, 407-408.
3. Fatalities associated with ingestion of diethylene glycol-contaminated glycerin used to manufacture acetaminophen syrup - Haiti, November 1995-June 1996. MMWR Morb. Mortal Wkly. Rep. 1996, 45:649-650.
4. Diethylene glycol poisoning associated with paracetamol liquid formulations. Adverse Drug React. Toxicol. Rev. 1998, 17:207-208.
5. Brown C.A., Brown S.A. Food and pharmaceuticals: lessons learned from global contaminations with melamine/cyanuric acid and diethylene glycol. Vet. Pathol. 2010, 47:45-52.
6. Roehr B. FDA looks afresh at adulteration of products. Br. Med. J. 2009, 338. b1851-1851.
7. R.W. Lutter, HHS (Ed.), Economically Motivated Adulteration, Public Meeting, Request for Comment, 2009.
8. Lavine G. Am. Soc. Health Syst. Pharm. 2010.
9. Broad N.W., Jee R.D., Moffat A.C., Eaves M.J., Mann W.C., Dziki W. Non-invasive determination of ethanol, propylene glycol and water in a multi-component pharmaceutical oral liquid by direct measurement through amber plastic bottles using Fourier transform near-infrared spectroscopy. Analyst 2000, 125:2054-2058.
10. Gryniewicz C.M., Spencer J.A., Hankins M., Kauffman J.F. Spectroscopic methods for rapid determination of diethylene glycol in glycerin. Am. Pharm. Rev. 2007, 10:24-30.
11. Kauffman J.F., Gryniewicz-Ruzicka C.M., Arzhantsev S., Dunn J.D., Spencer J.A., Wolfgang S., Li X., Pelster L.N., Westenberger B.J., Buhse L.F. Pharmaceutical surveillance with rapid spectroscopic screening technologies. Am. Pharm. Rev. 2010, 13. 58-62, 64.
12. O'Neal A.J., Jee R.D., Lee G., Charvill A., Moffat A.C. Use of portable near infrared spectrometer for authentication of tablets and the detection of counterfeit versions. J. Near Infrared Spectrosc. 2008, 16:327-333.
13. Kalyanaraman R., Dobler G., Rubick R. Portable spectrometers for pharmaceutical counterfeit detection. Am. Pharm. Rev. 2010, 13:38-45.
14. U.S. Pharmacopoeia, USP 32 - NF 27, Propylene Glycol. 2009.
15. Holloway G., Maheswaran R., Leeks A., Bradby S., Wahab S. Screening method for ethylene glycol and diethylene glycol in glycerin-containing products. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2010, 51:507-511.
16. JMP 5.1.1 2004, SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
17. Pirouette 4.0 Rev. 1 2007, Infometrix, Bothell, WA.
18. Kennard R.W., Stone L.A. Technometrics 1969, 11:137.
19. Currie L.A. Limits for qualitative detection and quantitative determination. Anal. Chem. 1968, 40:586-593.