Intrauterine Contraception in Adolescents and Young Women: A Descriptive Study of Use, Side Effects, and Compliance

Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 39-41

  Lara Torre, Eduardo ^a   Spotswood, Laurie ^a   Correia, Neil ^a   Weiss, Patrice M ^a  

^a VIRGINIA TECH CARILION SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescents; Intrauterine device; Population; Side effects

Indexed keywords

COPPER INTRAUTERINE DEVICE; LEVONORGESTREL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONCEPTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG USE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE DEVICE EXPULSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MUSCLE CRAMP; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PELVIC INFLAMMATORY DISEASE; POPULATION AND POPULATION RELATED PHENOMENA; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIDE EFFECT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VAGINA BLEEDING; VAGINA PAIN; VAGINITIS;

ADOLESCENT; DEVICE REMOVAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES, COPPER; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES, MEDICATED; LEVONORGESTREL; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78751696992     PISSN: 10833188     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2010.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Zibners A., Cromer B.A., Hayes J. Comparison of continuation rates for hormonal contraception among adolescents. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 1999, 12:90.
2. In brief: facts on American teens' sexual and reproductive health 2006, Guttmacher Institute, Guttmacher Institute, New York (NY), Accessed August 24, 2010. http://guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_ATSRH.html.
3. Lacy J. Clinic opinions regarding IUCD use in adolescents. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2006, 19:301.
4. Blumenthal P.D., Wilson L.E., Remsburg R.E., et al. Contraceptive outcomes among postpartum and postabortal adolescents. Contraception 1994, 50:451.
5. Ogburn J.A., Espey E., Stonehocker J. Barriers to Intrauterine device insertion in postpartum women. Contraception 2005, 72:426.
6. Intrauterine Devices and Adolescents December 2007, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC, ACOG Committee Opinion #392.
7. Intrauterine devices. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use 2004, 1-17. World Health Organization, WHO, Geneva, Accessed August 24, 2010. http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/publications/mec/7_iud.pdf, 3rd ed.
8. Eaton D.K., Kann L., Kinchen S., et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance-United States, 2005. MMWR Surveill Summ 2006, 55:1.
9. Toma A., Jamieson M.A. Revisiting the intrauterine contraceptive device in adolescents. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2006, 19:291.
10. McNaught J. Adolescents and IUCDs-Not a contraindication. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2006, 19:303.
11. Mosher W.D., Martinez G.M., Chandra A., et al. Use of contraception and use of family planning services in the United States: 1982-2002. Adv Data 2004, 350:1.
12. Luukkainen T., Allonen H., Haukkamaa M., et al. Effective contraception with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device: 12-month report of a European multicenter study. Contraception 1987, 36:169.
13. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 59. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2005, 105:223. Intrauterine device.
14. Deans E.I., Grimes D.A. Intrauterine devices for adolescents: a systematic review. Contraception 2009, 79:418.
15. Godfrey E.M., Memmel L.M., Neustadt A., et al. Intrauterine contraception for adolescents aged 14-18 years: a multicenter randomized pilot study of Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system compared to the Copper T 380A. Contraception 2010, 81:123.