Dynamically adaptable software product lines using Ruby metaprogramming

Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Feature-Oriented Software Development, FOSD'10

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 80-87

  Günther, Sebastian ^a   Sunkle, Sagar ^a  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

domain specific languages; feature oriented programming; metaprogramming; runtime adaptation; software product lines

Indexed keywords

DOMAIN SPECIFIC LANGUAGES; FEATURE-ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; METAPROGRAMMING; RUNTIME ADAPTATION; SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINE;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY; CONCRETE PRODUCTS; PROBLEM ORIENTED LANGUAGES; RUBY;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 78751682728     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1868688.1868700     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. S. Apel. The Role of Features and Aspects in Software Development. Dissertation, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, 2007.
2. D. Batory, J. N. Sarvela, and A. Rauschmayer. Scaling Step-Wise Refinement. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pages 187-197. IEEE Computer Society, 2003.
3. K. Czarnecki and U. W. Eisenecker. Generative Programming: Methods, Tools, and Applications. Addison-Wesley, Boston, San Franciso et al., 2000.
4. E. W. Dijkstra. Notes on Structured Programming. Academic Press Ltd., London, 1972.
5. S. Günther. Engineering Domain-Specific Languages with Ruby. In H.-K. Arndt and H. Krcmar, editors, 3. Workshop des Centers for Very Large Business Applications (CVLBA), pages 11-21, Aachen, 2009. Shaker.
6. S. Günther. Multi-DSL Applications with Ruby. IEEE Software, 27:25-30, 2010.
7. S. Günther and S. Sunkle. Enabling Feature-Oriented Programming in Ruby. Technical report (Internet) FIN-016-2009, Otto-von-Guericke- Universität Magdeburg, 2009.
8. S. Günther and S. Sunkle. Feature-Oriented Programming with Ruby. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Feature-Oriented Software Development (FOSD), pages 11-18, New York, 2009. ACM.
9. R. Hirschfeld, P. Costanza, and O. Nierstrasz. Context-Oriented Programming. Journal of Object Technology, 7(3):125-151, 2008.
10. K. Kang, S. Cohen, J. Hess, W. Novak, and A. Peterson. Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study. Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1990.
11. C. Kästner and S. Apel. Virtual Separation of Concerns - A Second Chance for Preprocessors. Journal of Object Technology (JOT), 8(6):59-78, Sept. 2009.
12. C. Kästner, S. Apel, and M. Kuhlemann. Granularity in Software Product Lines. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pages 311-320, New York, 2008. ACM.
13. G. Kiczales, J. Lamping, A. Menhdhekar, C. Maeda, C. Lopes, J.-M. Loingtier, and J. Irwin. Aspect-Oriented Programming. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP), volume 1241 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 220-242. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1997.
14. J. Lee and D. Muthig. Feature-Oriented Analysis and Specification of Dynamic Product Reconfiguration. In Proceedings of the 10th Internationale Conference on Software Reuse (ICSR), pages 154-165, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008. Springer Verlag.
15. R. E. Lopez-Herrejon and D. Batory. A Standard Problem for Evaluating Productline Methodologies. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Generative and Component-Based Software Engineering (GPCE), volume 2186 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 10-24, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 2001. Springer Verlag.
16. M. Mernik, J. Heering, and A. M. Sloane. When and How to Develop Domain-Specific Languages. ACM Computing Survey, 37(4):316-344, 2005.
17. B. Morin, O. Barais, and J. Jézéquel. K@rt: An Aspect-Oriented and Model-Oriented Framework for Dynamic Software Product Lines. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Models@run.time, pages 127-136, 2008.
18. P. Oreizy, N. Medvidovic, and R. N. Taylor. Runtime Software Adaptation: Framework, Approaches, and Styles. In Companion of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE2010), pages 899-910. ACM, 2008.
19. C. A. Parra, X. Blanc, and L. Duchien. Context Awareness for Dynamic Service-Oriented Product Lines. In D. Muthig and J. D. McGregor, editors, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Software Product Lines (SPLC), volume 446 of ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pages 131-140. ACM, 2009.
20. C. Prehofer. Feature-Oriented Programming: A Fresh Look at Objects. In Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP), volume 1241 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 419-443, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 1997. Springer Verlag.
21. M. Pukall, N. Siegmund, and W. Cazzola. Feature-Oriented Runtime Adaptation. In SINTER '09: Proceedings of the 2009 ESEC/FSE workshop on Software integration and evolution @ runtime, pages 33-36, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
22. M. Rosenmüller, N. Siegmund, G. Saake, and S. Apel. Combining Static and Dynamic Feature Binding in Software Product Lines. Technical Report FIN-013-2009, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, 2009.
23. Y. Smaragdakis and D. Batory. Mixin Layers: An Object-Oriented Implementation Technique for Refinements and Collaboration-Based Designs. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 11:215-255, 2002.
24. S. Sunkle and M. Pukall. Using Reified Contextual Information for Safe Run-time Adaptation of Software Product Lines. 2010.
25. D. Thomas, C. Fowler, and A. Hunt. Programming Ruby 1.9 - The Pragmatic Programmers' Guide. The Pragmatic Bookshelf, Raleigh, USA, 2009.
26. J. Withey. Investment Analysis of Software Assets for Product Lines. Technical Report CMU/SEI96-TR-010, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1996.
27. R. Wolfinger, S. Reiter, D. Dhungana, P. Grünbacher, and H. Prähofer. Supporting Runtime System Adaptation through Product Line Engineering and Plug-in Techniques. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Composition-Based Software Systems (ICCBSS), pages 21-30. IEEE Computer Society, 2008.