Modelling of the technical progress impact on the Romanian agriculture

Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment

Volumn 8, Issue 3-4 PART 2, 2010, Pages 1081-1085

  Ionescu, Romeo V ^a   Moga, Liliana M ^a   Antohi, Valentin M ^a  

^a DUNAREA DE JOS UNIVERSITY OF GALATI   (Romania)

Author keywords

Aggregate production function; Agricultural fixed capital efficiency; Agricultural labour knowledge; Catastrophe model; Human capital; Labour nature connection; Land fragmentation; Technologies

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL WORKER; AGRICULTURE; ARTICLE; AUTHORITY; ENVIRONMENT; EUROPE; HUMAN; MODEL; PIACENZIAN; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; ROMANIA; STATISTICS; AGRICULTURAL LAND; ITALY; WORK;

EID: 78751669186     PISSN: 14590255     EISSN: 14590263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Robinson, J. 1953. The Production Function and the Theory of Capital. 1953-4,RES.
2. Solow, R. M. and Stiglitz, J. E. 1968. Output, employment, and wages in the short ran. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 82(4): 537-560.
3. Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1972. Process analysis and the neoclassical theory of production. In American Journal of Agricultural Economics 54: 279-294.
4. Daly, H. 1997. Forum on Georgescu-Roegen versus Solow/Stiglitz. Ecological Economics 22(3):261-306.
5. Cohen, A. J. and Harcourt, G C. 2003. Retrospectives: Whatever happened to the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies? Journal of Economic Perspectives 17(1): 199-214.
6. Mishra, S. K. 2007. A Brief History of Production Functions. Working Paper Series, Social Science Research Network (SSRN).
7. Barnett, W. 2007. Dimensions and economics: Some problems. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 7(1):95-104.
8. th, 2008.
9. Hulten, C. R. and Schwab, R. M. 1984. Regional productivity growth in U.S. manufacturing: 1951 -1978. American Economic Review 74:152-162.
10. National Statistical Institute from Romania 2010. Statistic Yearbook. Bucharest, Chapter No. 14.
11. National Statistical Institute from Romania 2010. Monthly Statistical Bulletin. Bucharest, pp. 64-68.