Resumption strategies for interrupted programming tasks

Software Quality Journal

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 5-34

  Parnin, Chris ^a   Rugaber, Spencer ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Interruption; Resumption strategies; Task context; Task knowledge

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

DEVELOPMENT TOOLS; EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS; INTERRUPTION; PROFESSIONAL PROGRAMMERS; PROGRAMMING ACTIVITIES; RESUMPTION STRATEGIES; TASK CONTEXT; TASK KNOWLEDGE;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING;

EID: 78751644363     PISSN: 09639314     EISSN: 15731367     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11219-010-9104-9     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Adamczyk, P. D., & Bailey, B. P. (2004). If not now, when? The effects of interruption at different moments within task execution. In CHI'04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 271-278). New York, NY: ACM.
2. Allwood, C. (1984). Error detection processes in statistical problem solving. Cognitive Science, 8(4), 413-437.
3. Altmann, E. M., & Trafton, J. G. (2002). Memory for goals: An activation-based model. Cognitive Science, 26, 39-83.
4. Altmann, E. M., & Trafton, J. G. (2004). Task interruption: Resumption lag and the role of cues. In Proceedings of the 26th annual conference of the cognitive science society.
5. Altmann, E. M., & Trafton, J. G. (2007). Timecourse of recovery from task interruption: Data and a model. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 1079-1084.
6. Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., & Qin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111, 1036-1060.
7. Anderson, J. R., Farrell, R., & Sauers, R. (1984). Learning to program in lisp. Cognitive Science, 8(2), 87-129.
8. Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin. (1968). The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2), chapter Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes (pp. 89-195). Baddeley: Academic Press.
9. Baddeley, A., & Hitch, G. (1974). The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, chapter working memory (pp. 47-89). New York: Academic Press.
10. Bannon, L., Cypher, A., Greenspan, S., & Monty, M. L. (1983). Evaluation and analysis of users' activity organization. In CHI'83: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 54-57). New York, NY: ACM.
11. Bellotti, V., Dalal, B., Good, N., Flynn, P., Bobrow, D. G., & Ducheneaut, N. (2004). What a to-do: Studies of task management towards the design of a personal task list manager. In CHI'04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 735-742). New York, NY: ACM.
12. Borst, J. P., & Taatgen, N. A. (2007). The costs of multitasking in threaded cognition. In ICCM'07: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on cognitive modeling (pp. 133-138). Oxford: Psychology Press.
13. Brush, A. B., Meyers, B. R., Tan, D. S., & Czerwinski M. (2007). Understanding memory triggers for task tracking. In CHI'07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 947-950). New York, NY: ACM.
14. Chase, W., & Simon, H. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55-81.
15. Chase, W. G., & Ericsson, K. A. (1982). The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 16, chapter Skill and working memory (pp. 1-58). New York: Academic Press.
16. Cherubini, M., Venolia, G., DeLine, R., & Ko, A. J. (2007). Let's go to the whiteboard: How and why software developers use drawings. In CHI'07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 557-566). New York, NY: ACM.
17. Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. The Behavioral and brain sciences, 24(1), 87-185.
18. Cutrell, E., Czerwinski, M., & Horvitz, E. (2001). Notification, disruption and memory: Effects of messaging interruptions on memory and performance.
19. Czerwinski, M., Horvitz, E., & Wilhite, S. (2004). A diary study of task switching and interruptions. In CHI'04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp 175-182). New York, NY: ACM Press.
20. Dekel, U. (2008). Designing a prosthetic memory to support software developers. In ICSE companion'08: Companion of the 30th international conference on software engineering (pp. 1011-1014). New York, NY: ACM.
21. DeLine, R., Czerwinski, M., Meyers, B., Venolia, G., Drucker, S., & Robertson, G. (2006). Code thumbnails: Using spatial memory to navigate source code. In VLHCC'06: Proceedings of the visual languages and human-centric computing (pp. 11-18). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
22. Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211-245.
23. Ericsson, K. A., & Staszewski, J. J. (1989). Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert A. Simon, chapter Skilled memory and expertise: Mechanisms of exceptional performance (pp. 235-267). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Fogarty, J., Ko, A. J., Aung, H. H., Golden, E., Tang, K. P., & Hudson, S. E. (2005). Examining task engagement in sensor-based statistical models of human interruptibility. In CHI'05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 331-340). New York, NY: ACM.
25. Gilboa, A., et al. (2006). Hippocampal contributions to recollection in retrograde and anterograde amnesia. Hippocampus, 16(11), 966-980.
26. Gillie, T., & Broadbent, D. (1998). What makes interruptions disruptive? a study of length, similiarity, and complexity. Psychological Research, 50, 243-250.
27. Hodgetts, H. M., & Jones, D. M. (2006). Contextual cues aid recovery from interruption: The role of associative activitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(5), 1120-1132.
28. Iqbal, S. T., & Bailey, B. P. (2005). Investigating the effectiveness of mental workload as a predictor of opportune moments for interruption. In CHI'05: CHI'05 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1489-1492). New York, NY: ACM.
29. Kersten, M., & Murphy, G. C. (2006). Using task context to improve programmer productivity. In SIGSOFT'06/FSE-14: Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on foundations of software engineering (pp. 1-11). New York, NY: ACM.
30. th international conference on software engineering (pp. 126-135). New York, NY: ACM.
31. Ko, A. J., DeLine, R., & Venolia, G. (2007). Information needs in collocated software development teams. In ICSE'07: Proceedings of the 29th international conference on software engineering (pp. 344-353). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
32. Latoza, T. D., Venolia, G., & Deline R. (2006). Maintaining mental models: A study of developer work habits. In ICSE'06: Proceeding of the 28th international conference on software engineering (pp. 492-501). New York, NY: ACM Press.
33. Lethbridge, T. C., Sim, S. E., & Singer, J. (2005). Studying software engineers: Data collection techniques for software field studies. Empirical Software Engineering, 10(3):311-341.
34. Mark, G., Gonzalez, V. M., & Harris J. (2005). No task left behind? Examining the nature of fragmented work. In CHI'05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 321-330). New York, NY: ACM Press.
35. Mayrhauser, A. V., & Vans, A. M. (1997). Hypothesis-driven understanding processes during corrective maintenance of large scale software. In ICSM'97: Proceedings of the international conference on software maintenance (pp. 12-20). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
36. McFarlane, D. (2002). Comparison of four primary methods for coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 17(1), 63-139.
37. McKinney, F. (1935). Studies in the retention of interrupted learning activities. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 19(2), 265-296.
38. Miller, G. A. (1994). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. 1956. Psychological Review, 101(2), 343-352.
39. Milner, B., Corsi, P., & Leonard, G. (1991). Frontal-lobe contribution to recency judgements. Neuropsychologia, 29(6), 601-618.
40. Miyata, Y., & Norman, D. A. (1986). Psychological issues in support of multiple activities. In D. A. Norman & S. W. Draper, (Eds.), User centered system design: New perspectives on human-computer interaction (pp. 265-284). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Monk, C., Trafton, J., & Boehm-Davis, D. A. (2008). The effect of interruption duration and demand on resuming suspended goals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 299-313.
42. Monk, C. A. (2004). The efffect of frequent versus infrequent interruptions on primary task resumption. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 48th annual meeting.
43. Morris, R. G., & Frey, U. (1997). Hippocampal synaptic plasticity: Role in spatial learning or the automatic recording of attended experience? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 352(1360), 1489-1503.
44. Morris, R. G. M. (2006). Elements of a neurobiological theory of hippocampal function: The role of synaptic plasticity, synaptic tagging and schemas. European Journal of Neuroscience, 23(11), 2829-2846.
45. Murphy, G. C., Kersten, M., & Findlater, L. (2006). How are Java software developers using the Eclipse IDE? (vol. 23, pp. 76-83). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Comp. Soc. Press.
46. O'Brien, M. P., & Buckley, J. (2005). Modelling the information-seeking behaviour of programmers-an empirical approach. In IWPC'05: Proceedings of the 13th international workshop on program comprehension (pp. 125-134). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
47. O'Conaill, B., & Frohlich, D. (1995). Timespace in the workplace: Dealing with interruptions. In CHI'95: Conference companion on human factors in computing systems (pp. 262-263).NewYork,NY:ACMPress.
48. Offner, M. (1911). Mental Fatigue. Warwick & York.
49. Parnin, C., & DeLine, R. (2010). Evaluating cues for resuming interrupted programming tasks. In CHI'10: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 93-102). New York, NY: ACM.
50. Parnin, C., Görg, C. (2006). Building usage contexts during program comprehension. In ICPC'06: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE international conference on program comprehension (pp. 13-22).
51. Pennington, N., & Grabowski, B. (1990). The tasks of programming. In Psychology of programming, Computer and People Series, chapter 1.4 (pp. 45-62). London: Academic Press Ltd.
52. Ratwani, R. M., & Trafton J. G. (2008). Spatial memory guides task resumption. Visual Cognition, 16, 1001-1010.
53. Renaud, K., & Gray, P. (2004). Making sense of low-level usage data to understand user activities. In Proceedings of SAICSIT'04, (pp. 115-124). Republic of South Africa, 2004. South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists.
54. Robbes, R., & Lanza, M. (2007). Characterizing and understanding development sessions. In ICPC'07: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE international conference on program comprehension (pp. 155-166). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
55. Safer, I., & Murphy, G. C. (2007). Comparing episodic and semantic interfaces for task boundary identification. In CASCON'07: Proceedings of the 2007 conference of the center for advanced studies on collaborative research (pp. 229-243). New York, NY: ACM.
56. Salvucci, D. D., Taatgen, N. A., & Borst, J. P. (2009). Toward a unified theory of the multitasking continuum: From concurrent performance to task switching, interruption, and resumption. In CHI'09: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1819-1828), New York, NY: ACM.
57. Singer, J., Elves, R., & Storey, M.-A. (2005). Navtracks: Supporting navigation in software maintenance. In ICSM'05: Proceedings of the 21st IEEE international conference on software maintenance (pp. 325-334). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
58. Sinha, V., Karger, D., & Miller, R. (2006). Relo: Helping users manage context during interactive exploratory visualization of large codebases. In VLHCC'06: Proceedings of the visual languages and human-centric computing (pp. 187-194). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
59. Squire, L. R. (2004). Memory systems of the brain: A brief history and current perspective. Neurobiology of learning and memory, 82(3), 171-177.
60. Storey, M.-A., Best, C., Michaud, J., Rayside, D., Litoiu, M., & Musen, M. (2002). Shrimp views: An interactive environment for information visualization and navigation. In CHI'02: CHI'02 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 520-521), New York, NY: ACM.
61. Storey, M.-A., Ryall, J., Bull, R. I., Myers, D., & Singer, J. (2008). Todo or to bug: Exploring how task annotations play a role in the work practices of software developers. In ICSE'08: Proceedings of the 30th international conference on software engineering (pp. 251-260), New York, NY: ACM.
62. The Eclipse Foundation. (2009). Usage Data Collector Results. January 5th, 2009. Website, http://www.eclipse.org/org/usagedata/reports/data/commands.cs.
63. th annual meeting.
64. Trafton, J. G., Altmann, E. M., Brock, D. P., & Mintz, F. E. (2003). Preparing to resume an interrupted task: Effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 583-603.
65. Tulving. E. (1972). Organization of memory, chapter Episodic and semantic memory (pp. 381-403). New York: Academic Press.
66. Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.
67. van Solingen, R., Berghout, E., & van Latum, F. (1998). Interrupts: Just a minute never is. IEEE Software, 15(5), 97-103.
68. Winograd, E. (1988). Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues, Vol. 2, chapter Some observations on prospective remembering (pp. 348-353). Chichester: Wiley.
69. Zeigarnik, B. (1927). Das behalten erledigter und unerledigter handlungen. Psychologische Forschung, 9(1), 1-85.
70. Zijlstra, F. R. H., Roe, R. A., Leonova, A. B., & Krediet, I. (1999). Temporal factors in mental work: Effects of interrupted activities. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 163-185.
71. Zou, L., & Godfrey, M. W. (2006). An industrial case study of program artifacts viewed during maintenance tasks. In WCRE'06: Proceedings of the 13th working conference on reverse engineering (pp. 71-82). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.