Design [science] research in IS: A work in progress

DESRIST 2007 Conference Proceedings - 2nd International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-17

  Kuechler, Bill ^a   Vaishnavi, Vijay ^b   Kuechler Sr , William L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS SCHOOLS; DESIGN RESEARCH; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY; IS DESIGN; IS RESEARCHES; ORGANIZATIONAL SETTING; RESEARCH TRADITIONS; WORK IN PROGRESS;

DESIGN; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT SCIENCE;

RESEARCH;

EID: 78751638527     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (42)

1. Ackoff, R. (1967). "Management Misinformation Systems." Management Science 14(4): 147-156.
2. Alter, S. (2000). "Same Words, Different Meanings: Are Basic IS/IT Concepts Our Self- Imposed Tower of Babel?" Communication of the AIS 3 (Article 10).
3. Bajaj, A., Batra, D., Hevner, A., Parsons, J. and Siau, K. (2005). "Systems Analysis and Design: Should we be Researching What We Teach?" Communication of the AIS 15: 478-493.
4. Benbasat, I. and Weber, R. (1996). "Rethinking "Diversity" in Information Systems Research." Information Systems Research 7(4): 389-399.
5. Benbasat, I. and Zmud, R. (1999). "Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance." MIS Quarterly 23(1): 3-16.
6. Bennis, W. and O'Toole, J. (2005). "How Business Schools Lost Their Way." Harvard Business Review, May 2005, pp. 96-104.
7. Brooks, F. (1987). "No Silver Bullet: Essence and Accidents of Software Engineering", IEEE Computer 20:4 (April), pp. 10-19.
8. Davenport, T. and Markus, L. (1999) "Rigor and Relevance Revisited: Response to Benbasat and Zmud." MISQ 23(1): 19-23
9. Dearden, J. (1972). "MIS is a Mirage." Harvard Business Review (January-February): 90-99.
10. Eekels, J. and Roozenburg, N. (1991). "A methodological comparison of the structures of scientific research and engineering design: their similarities and differences," Design Studies 12:4, pp. 197-203.
11. Evbuonwan, N, Sivaloganathan, S. and Jebb, A. (1996). "A Survey of design philosophies, model methods and systems," Proceedings of the Institute of Mechanical Engineers 210 pp. 301-320.
12. Goldkuhl, G. (2004). "Design Theories in Information Systems - A Need for Multi- Grounding." Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 6(2): 59-72.
13. Gregor, S. (2006) "The Nature of Theory in Information Systems," MISQ 30(3), 611-642.
14. Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J. and Ram, S. (2004). "Design Science in Information Systems Research." MIS Quarterly 28:1, 75-105.
15. Iivari, J. (1986). "Dimensions of Information Systems Design: A Framework for a Longrange Research Program." Information Systems Frontiers 11(2): 185-197.
16. Iivari, J. (2002). "The IS Core - VIII - Towards Information Systems as a Science of Meta-Artifacts." Commmunications of the AIS 12: 568-581.
17. Klingsheim, K. and Aaserud, O. (1992). Design theory; the foundation for concurrent engineering. Reliability and Maintainability Computer-Aided Engineering in Concurrent Engineering, 1990 and 1991, Combined Proceedings of the 1990 and 1991 Leesburg Workshops, pp. 43-50.
18. King, J. and Lyytinen, K. (2004). "Reach and Grasp" MIS Quarterly 28:4, pp. 539-551.
19. March, S. and Smith, G. (1995). "Design and Natural Science Research on Information Technology." Decision Support Systems 15, pp. 251 - 266.
20. Markus, M., Majchrzak, A., and Gasser, L. (2002). "A Design Theory for Systems that Support Emergent Knowledge Processes." MIS Quarterly 26(3): 179-212.
21. Mason, R. (2006). "Comments on the Weber commentary and Lyytinen/King response," Journal of the AIS 7:11, pp. 722-724.
22. McGee, M. (2006). "Top Worries for CIOs." InformationWeek. 9/18/2006 Issue 1106, p.14-15.
23. Mori, G., Paterno, F., and Santoro, C. (2002). "CTTE: support for developing and analyzing task models for interactive system design." IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 28(8): 797-813.
24. Nunamaker, J., Chen, M. and Purdin, T. (1991). "Systems Development in Information Systems Research." Journal of Management Information Systems 7(3): 89-106.
25. Orlikowski, W. and Baroudi, J. (1991). "Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions." Information Systems Research 2:(1): 1-28.
26. Orlikowski, W. and Iacono, C. (2001). "Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact." Information Systems Research 12(2): 121-134.
27. Orlikowski, W. and Barley, S. (2001). "Technology and Institutions: What Can Research on Information Technology and Research on Organizations Learn from Each Other." MIS Quarterly 25:2, pp. 145-165.
28. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rossi, M., Virtanen,V., Bragge, J, and Hui, W. (2006). The Design Science Research Process: A Model for Producing and Presenting Information Systems Research. DESRIST 2006, Claremont, CA.
29. Popper, K. (1983). Realism and the Aim of Science (W. W. Botten II, Ed), Routledge, London.
30. Preston, M. and Mehandjiev, N. (2004). A Framework for Classifying Intelligent Design Theories. WISER'04, Newport Beach, CA, ACM.
31. Simon, A. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd Edition. MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).
32. Steinbach, T. and Knight, L. (2006). The Relevance of Information Systems Research: Informing the IS Practitioner Community; Informing Ourselves. 2006 Informing Science and IT Education Joint Conference, Salford, UK, Informing Science.
33. Taylor, P. (2000). Designerly thinking: what software methodology can learn from design theory. Software Methods and Tools, 2000. SMT 2000, Proceedings. International Conference on.
34. Truex, D. (2001). "Three Issues Concerning Relevance in IS Research: Epistemology, Audience and Method." Communications of the AIS 6:24, pp. 1-10.
35. Vahidov, R. (2006). Design Researcher's IS Artifact: a Representational Framework. Proceedings DESRIST 2006, Claremont, CA.
36. Vaishnavi, V. and Kuechler, W. (2004). "Design Research in Information Systems" January 20, 2004, last updated January 18, 2006. URL: http://www.isworld.org/Researchdesign/drisISworld.htm
37. Venable, J. (2006). The Role of Theory and Theorizing in Design Science Research. Proceedings DESRIST 2006, Claremont, CA.
38. Walls, J., Widmeyer, G. and El Sawy, O. (1992). "Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS." Information Systems Research 3(1): 36-59.
39. Walls, J., Widmeyer, G., and El Sawy, O. (2004). "Assessing Information System Design Theory in Perspective: How Useful was our 1992 Initial Rendition." Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 6(2): 43-58.
40. Weber, R. (1987). "Toward a Theory of Artifacts: A Paradigmatic Base for Information Systems Research." Journal of Information Systems 1(2): 3-19.
41. Weber, R. (2003). "Still Desperately Seeking the IT Artifact," MIS Quarterly, 27:2, pp. iii - x.
42. Weber, R. (2006). "Reach and Grasp in the Debate over the IS Core: An Empty Hand?" Journal of the AIS 7:11, pp. 703-713.