Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision making problems under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment

Applied Mathematical Modelling

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 2544-2556

  Park, Jin Han ^a   Park, Il Young ^a   Kwun, Young Chel ^b   Tan, Xuegong ^c  

^a Pukyong National University   (South Korea)

^b Dong A University   (South Korea)

^c JINAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision matrix; Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid geometric (IIFHG) operator; Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy number (IVIFN); Multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM); TOPSIS

Indexed keywords

INTERVAL-VALUED; INTERVAL-VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY NUMBER; INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY; MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE GROUP; TOPSIS;

AVIONICS; DECISION MAKING; FUZZY RULES; GEOMETRY; MATRIX ALGEBRA;

FUZZY SETS;

EID: 78751632458     PISSN: 0307904X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2010.11.025     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Hwang C.L., Yoon K. Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Theory and Applications 1992, Springer, Berlin.
2. Lai Y.J., Liu T.Y., Hwang C.L. TOPSIS for MODM. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1994, 76(3):486-500.
3. Abo-Sinha M.A., Amer A.H. Extensions of TOPSIS for multi-objective large-scale nonlinear programming problems. Appl. Math. Comput. 2005, 162:243-256.
4. Opricovic S., Tzeng G.H. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2004, 156:445-455.
5. S. Opricovic, Multicriteria Optimization of Civil Engineering Systems, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade, 1998.
6. Chen C.T. Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2000, 114:1-9.
7. Chen T.Y., Tsao C.Y. The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2008, 159:1410-1428.
8. Jahanshaloo G.R., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F., Izadikhah M. An algorithmic method to extend TOPSIS method for decision-making problems with interval data. Appl. Math. Comput. 2006, 175:1375-1384.
9. Jahanshaloo G.R., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F., Izadikhah M. Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision-making problems with fuzzy data. Appl. Math. Comput. 2006, 181:1544-1551.
10. Wang Y.J., Lee H.S. Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision-making. Comput. Math. Appl. 2007, 53:1762-1772.
11. Yang T., Hung C.C. Multi-attribute decision making methods for plant layout design problem. Robotics Comput. Integrated Manuf. 2007, 23:126-137.
12. Sun C.C. A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst. Appl. 2010, 37:7745-7754.
13. Saaty T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process 1980, McGraw-Hill, New York.
14. Lazim A., Sunadia J., Imran T. A new hierarchy process in multi-attribute group decision making. Int. J. Soft Comput. 2009, 4:208-214.
15. Cakir O., Canbolat M.S. A web-based decision support system for multicriteria inventory classification using fuzzy AHP methodology. Expert Syst. Appl. 2008, 35:1367-1378.
16. Chen M.F., Tzeng G.H., Ding C.G. Combining fuzzy AHP with MDS in identifying the preference similarity of alternatives. Appl. Soft Comput. 2008, 8:110-117.
17. Costa C.A.B., Vansnick J.C. A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2008, 187:1422-1428.
18. Huang C.C., Chu P.Y., Chiang Y.H. A fuzzy AHP application in government-sponsored R&D project selection. Omega 2008, 36:1038-1052.
19. Wang Y.M., Luo Y., Hua Z. On the extent analysis metho d for fuzzy AHP and its applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2008, 186:735-747.
20. Torfi F., Farahani R.Z., Rezapour S. Fuzzy AHP to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the alternatives. Appl. Soft Comput. 2010, 10:520-528.
21. Atanassov K., Gargov G. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1989, 31:343-349.
22. Atanassov K. Operators over interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1994, 64:159-174.
23. Xu Z.S. Methods for aggregating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to decision making. Control Decis. 2007, 22:215-219.
24. Z.S. Xu, J. Chen, On geometric aggregation over interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information, in: Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD'07) vol. 2, 2007, pp. 466-471.
25. Xu Z.S., Chen J. An approach to group decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic judgement matrices. Syst. Eng. Theor. Pract. 2007, 27:126-133.
26. Wei G.W., Wang X.R. Some geometric aggregation operators on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application to group decision making. Proc. 2007 ICCIS 2007, 495-499.
27. Bustince H., Burillo P. Correlation of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1995, 74. 327-244.
28. Hong D.H. A note on correlation of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1998, 95:113-117.
29. Park D.G., Kwun Y.C., Park J.H., Park I.Y. Correlation coefficient of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application to multiple attribute group decision making problems. Math. Comput. Model. 2009, 50:1279-1293.
30. Park J.H., Lim K.M., Park J.S., Kwun Y.C. Distances between interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2008, 96:012089.
31. Deschrijver G., Kerre E. On the relationship between some extensions of fuzzy set theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2003, 133:227-235.
32. Kim S.H., Ahn B.S. Interactive group decision making procedure under incomplete information. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1999, 116:498-507.
33. Kim S.H., Choi S.H., Kim H. An interactive procedure for multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete information: Range-based approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1999, 118:139-152.
34. Burillo P., Bustince H. Entropy on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and interval-valued fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1996, 78:305-316.
35. Grzegorzewski P. Distance between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and/or interval-valued fuzzy sets on the Hausdorff metric. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2004, 148:319-328.
36. Yoon K. The propagation of errors in multiple-attribute decision making analysis: A practical approach. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 1989, 40:681-686.
37. Xu Z.S. An overview of methods for determining OWA weights. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2005, 20:843-865.