Refocusing the debate about advocacy

Conservation Biology

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-3

  Scott, J Michael ^a   Rachlow, Janet L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSUMER ADVOCACY; EDITORIAL; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; CONSUMER ADVOCACY;

EID: 78751627587     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01629.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (15)

1. Black, B., F. J. Aayala, and C. Saffran-brinks 1994. Science and the law in the wake of Daubert: a new search for scientific knowledge. Texas Law Review 72:715-802.
2. Brussard, P. F., and J. C. Tull 2007. Conservation and four types of advocacy. Conservation Biology 21:21-24.
3. Hilborn, R. 2006. Faith-based fisheries. Fisheries 31:554-555.
4. Lackey, R.T. 2007. Science, scientists, and policy advocacy. Conservation Biology 21:12-17.
5. Meyer, J. L., P. C. Frumhoff, S. P. Hamburg, and C. de la Rosa 2010. Above the din but in the fray: environmental scientists as effective advocates. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8:299-305.
6. Nelson, M. P., and J. A. Vucetich 2009. On advocacy by environmental scientists: what, whether, why and how. Conservation Biology 25:1090-1101.
7. Noss, R. F. 1996. Conservation biology, values and advocacy. Conservation Biology 10:904.
8. Pielke, R. A. 2007. The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom
9. Ruggiero, L. F. 2010. Scientific independence and credibility in sociopolitical processes. Journal of Wildlife Management 74:1179-1182.
10. Scott, J. M., J. L. Rachlow, and R. T. Lackey 2008. Policy and position statements: what is an appropriate role of professional societies? BioScience 58:865-869.
11. Scott J. M., J. L. Rachlow, R. T. Lackey, A. B. Pidgorna, J. L. Aycrigg, G. R. Feldman, L. K. Svancara, D. A. Rupp, D. I. Stanish, and R. K. Steinhorst 2007. Policy, advocacy, and science: prevalence in the research literature and perspectives of conservation biologists. Conservation Biology 21:29-35.
12. Sutherland, W.J., et al 2009. One hundred questions of importance to global biological diversity. Conservation Biology 23:557-567.
13. Tracy, C. R., and P. F. Brussard 1996. The importance of science in conservation biology. Conservation Biology 10:918-919.
14. Wiens, J. A. 1996. Oil, seabirds, and science. BioScience 46:587-597.
15. Yamamoto, Y. T. 2010. Values, objectivity and credibility of scientists in a contentious natural resource debate. Public Understanding of Science 1 DOI: