Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of surgical scalpel or diathermy in making abdominal skin incisions

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 253, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 8-13

  Ahmad, Nasir Zaheer ^a   Ahmed, Aftab ^b  

^a WATERFORD REGIONAL HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

^b Naas General Hospital   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; DIATHERMY; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; META ANALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCALPEL; SKIN INCISION; SURGICAL INFECTION; TIME;

ABDOMINAL WALL; CRYOSURGERY; DIATHERMY; HUMANS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SKIN;

EID: 78751625800     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ff461f     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Goldwyn RM. Bovie: the man and the machine. Ann Plast Surg. 1979;2: 135-153.
2. Cushing H. Electrosurgery as an aid to the removal of intracranial tumors. With a preliminary note on a new surgical current generator by W.T. Bovie. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1928;47:751-784.
3. Sheldon VP, Alastair C, Roy CG. The history of electrosurgery. Dermatol Surg. 2000;26(10):904-908.
4. Voutilainen PE, Haapiainen RK, Haglund CH. Ultrasonically activated shears in thyroid surgery. Am J Surg. 1998;175:491-493.
5. Kennedy JS, Stranahan PL, Taylor KD, et al. High-burst-strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing. Surg Endosc. 1998;12:876-878.
6. Assiotis A, Christofi T, Raptis DA, et al. Diathermy training and usage trends among surgical trainees-will we get our fingers Burnt? Surgeon. 2009;7(3):132-136.
7. Byrnes FJ, Kearns SR, Mulhall KJ, et al. Diathermy versus scalpel incisions for hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture: a randomized prospective trial. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2007;17:445-448.
8. Sheikh B. Safety and efficacy of electrocautery scalpel utilization for skin opening in neurosurgery. Br J Neurosurg. 2004;18(3):268-272.
9. Sheahan P, Miller I, Colreavy M, et al. The ultrasonically activated scalpel versus bipolar diathermy for tonsillectomy: a prospective, randomized trial. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004;29(5):530-534.
10. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996; 17:1-12.
11. Hussain SA, Hussain S. Incisions with knife or diathermy and postoperative pain. Br J Surg. 1988;75:1179-1180.
12. Johnson CD, Serpell JW. Wound infection after abdominal incision with scalpel or diathermy. Br J Surg. 1990;77(6):626-627.
13. Dixon AR, Watkin DF. Electrosurgical skin incision versus conventional scalpel: a prospective trial. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1990;35(5): 299-301.
14. Pearlman NW, Stiegmann GV, Vance V, et al. A prospective study of incisional time, blood loss, pain, and healing with carbon dioxide laser, scalpel, and electrosurgery. Arch Surg. 1991;126(8):1018-1020.
15. Hemsell DL, Hemsell PG, Nobles B, et al. Abdominal wound problems after hysterectomy with electrocautery vs. scalpel subcutaneous incision. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1993;1(1):27-31.
16. Telfer JR, Canning G, Galloway DJ. Comparative study of abdominal incision techniques. Br J Surg. 1993;80(2):233-235.
17. Groot G, Chappell EW. Electrocautery used to create incisions does not increase wound infection rates. Am J Surg. 1994;167(6):601-603.
18. Franchi M, Ghezzi F, Benedetti-Panici PL, et al. A multicentre collaborative study on the use of cold scalpel and electrocautery for midline abdominal incision. Am J Surg. 2001;181(2):128-132.
19. Kearns SR, Connolly EM, McNally S, et al. Randomized clinical trial of diathermy versus scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy. Br J Surg. 2001;88(1):41-44.
20. Chrysos E, Athanasakis E, Antonakakis S, et al. A prospective study comparing diathermy and scalpel incisions in tension-free inguinal hernioplasty. Am Surg. 2005;71(4):326-329.
21. Shamim M. Diathermy vs. scalpel skin incisions in general surgery: double-blind, randomized, clinical trial. World J Surg. 2009;33(8): 1594-1599.
22. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta analyses of randomized controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses. Lancet. 1999;453(9193):1896-1900.
23. Aigner N, Fialka C, Fritz A, et al. Complications in the use of diathermy. Burns. 1997;23(3):256-264.
24. Willson PD, van der Walt JD, Moxon D, et al. Port site electrosurgical (diathermy) burns during surgical laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 1997;11(6):653-654.
25. Tooher R, Maddern GJ, Simpson J. Surgical fires and alcohol-based skin preparations. ANZ J Surg. 2004;74(5):382-385.
26. Watt AM, Patkin M, Sinnott MJ, et al. Scalpel safety in the operative setting: a systematic review. Surgery. 2010;147(1):98-106.
27. Wu X, Thomson G, Tang B. An investigation into the impact of safety features on the ergonomics of surgical scalpels. Apple Ergon. 2009;40(3): 424-432.
28. Brusaferro S, Calligaris L, Farneti F, et al. Educational programs and sharps injuries in health care workers. Occup Med (Lond). 2009;59(7):512-514.
29. Hughes A, Hughes J. Electrosurgical smoke plume, is it harmful to staff? Br J Periop Nurs. 2001;11:252-255.
30. Biggins J, Renfree S. The hazards of surgical smoke, not to be sniffed at! Br J Periop Nurs. 2002;12:136-138.
31. Sawchuk WS, Weber PJ, Lowy DR, et al. Infectious papillomavirus in the vapour of warts treated with carbon dioxide laser or electrocoagulation: detection and protection. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989;21:41-49.
32. Garden JM, O'Banion MK, Shelnitz LS, et al. Papillomavirus in the vapour of carbon dioxide laser-treated verrucae. JAMA. 1988;259:1199-1202.
33. Lanfranchi JA. Smoke plume evacuation in the OR. AORN J. 1997;65(3):627-633.
34. Cruse PJE, Foord R. A five-year prospective study of 23,649 surgical wounds. Arch Surg. 1973;107(2):206-210.
35. Kumagai SG, Rosales RF, Hunter GC, et al. Effect of electrocautery on midline laparotomy wound infection. Am J Surg. 1991;162(6):620-623.
36. Soballe PW, Nimbkar NV, Hayward I, et al. Electric cautery lowers the contamination threshold for infection of laparotomies. Am J Surg. 1998;175:263-266.
37. Yamamoto D, Yamada M, Okugawa H, et al. A comparison between elec-trocautery and scalpel plus scissor in breast conserving surgery. Oncol Rep. 2003;10(6):1729-1732.
38. Chau JK, Dzigielewski P, Mlynarek A, et al. Steel scalpel versus electrocautery blade: comparison of cosmetic and patient satisfaction outcomes of different incision methods. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;38(4):427-433.