On-line privacy and consent: A dialogue, not a monologue

Proceedings New Security Paradigms Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 95-105

  Coles Kemp, Lizzie ^a   Kani Zabihi, Elahe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

consent; privacy; privacy and consent technologies; privacy statements; service provider; service user; user agreements

Indexed keywords

CONSENT; PRIVACY; PRIVACY AND CONSENT TECHNOLOGIES; PRIVACY STATEMENTS; SERVICE PROVIDER; SERVICE USER; USER AGREEMENTS; SERVICE USERS;

SPEECH PROCESSING; DATA PRIVACY; SECURITY OF DATA;

SECURITY OF DATA; SPEECH PROCESSING;

EID: 78751622191     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1900546.1900560     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Probst, C.W and Hansen, R. R. 2009. Fluid Information Systems. In Proceedings of New Security Paradigms Workshop. http://www.nspw.org/proceedings/ 2009
2. Laurie, B. and Singer, A. 2009. Choose the Red Pill and the Blue Pill. In Proceedings of New Security Paradigms Workshop. http://www.nspw.org/ proceedings/2009
3. Turpe, S., 2009. What is the Shape of Your Security Policy? Security as a Classification Problem. In Proceedings of New Security Paradigms Workshop. http://www.nspw.org/proceedings/2009
4. Shirley, J. and Evans, D. 2009. The User is Not the Enemy: Fighting Malware by Tracking User Intentions. In Proceedings of New Security Paradigms Workshop. http://www.nspw.org/proceedings/2009
5. Church, L. and Whitten, A. 2009. Generative Usability: Security and User Centered Design beyond the Appliance. In Proceedings of New Security Paradigms Workshop. http://www.nspw.org/proceedings/2009
6. Bogdanovic, D. Crawford, C. and Coles-Kemp, L. 2009. The need for enhanced privacy and consent dialogues. Information Security Technical Report, 14(3), p (167-172).
7. Langheinrich, M. 2002. A Privacy Awareness System for Ubiquitous Computing Environments. Ubiquitous Computing , 315-320, Springer.
8. Coles-Kemp, L. Lai, Y. Ford, M. 2009. Privacy: Contemporary Developments in Users' Attitudes and Behaviours. http://www.vome.org.uk/index.php/ publications/
9. Teltzrow, M. and Kobsa, A. 2004. Impacts of User Privacy Preferences on Personalised Systems. Designing personalised user experiences in eCommerce. Springer, p (315-332).
10. Fox, S., Rainie, L., Horrigan, J., Lenhart, A., Spooner, T., Carter, C. 2000. Trust and Privacy Online: Why Americans Wants to Rewrite the Rules. The Pew Internet & American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org
11. Bennett, L. 2009. Reflections on Privacy, Identity and Consent in Online Services. Information Security Technical Report, 14(3), p (119-123).
12. Smith, H., Milberg, S., Bruke, S. 1996. Information Privacy: Measuring individuals' concerns about organisational practices. MIS Quart. 20(2), p (167-196).
13. Malik, N.A. and Tomlinson, A. 2009. Privacy and Consent in Pervasive Networks. Information Security Technical Report, 14(3), p (138-142).
14. W3C. 2010. Platform for Privacy Preferences, Technology and Society domain. http://www.w3.org/P3P
15. th April 2010, Oxford, UK. https://www.privacyos.eu/
16. Privacy and Identity Management for Community Services. http://www.picos-project.eu
17. Jensen, C. Potts, C. Jensen, C. Privacy practices of Internet Users: Self-reports Versus Observed Behaviour. 2005. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 63(1-2), p (203-227).
18. Brands, S. 2010. U-Prove Technology Overview. Microsoft Corporation. https://connect.microsoft.com
19. Clique.2010.Privacy. http://clique.primelife.eu/pg/expages/read/Privacy
20. IDEMIX. http://www.zurich.ibm.com/pri/projects/idemix.html
21. Westin, A.F. 1967. Privacy and Freedom. New York, Atheneum, p (xvi).
22. Allen, A.L. 1988. Uneasy access: Privacy for women in a free society. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
23. Whitley, E.A. 2009. Informational Privacy, Consent and the "Control" of Personal Data. Information Security Technical Report, 14(3), p (154-159).
24. Barley, S.R. 1988. Technology, power, and the social organization of work: Towards a paradigmatic theory of skilling and deskilling. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 6, p (33-60).
25. Leuthersser, l., Kohli, A, K. 1995. Relational Behaviour in Business Markets - Implications for Relationship Management, Journal of Business Research 34, pp. 221-233
26. Paine, C., Reips, U.-D., Stieger, S., Joinson, A., & Buchanan, T. (2007). Internet users'perceptions of 'privacy concerns' and 'privacy actions'. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(6), 526-536.
27. Norberg, P. A., Horne, D. R., & Horne, D. A. (2007). The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions versus Behaviors. Journal of Consumer Affairs,41(1), 100-126.
28. Bruhn M., Grund M. (2000) Theory, Development and Implementation of National Customer Satisfaction Indices: the Swiss Index of Customer Satisfaction (SWICS) Total Quality Management, Volume 11, Number 7
29. Horn D., Feinberg R., Salvendy, G.(2005) Determinant Elements of Customer Relationshjp Management in e-Business. Behaviour and Information Technology Volume 24, Number 2
30. Buchanan, Tom, Ulf-Dietrich Reips, Carina Paine and Adam N. Joinson, (2007) "Development of measures of on?line privacy concern and protection for use on the Internet." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 58, Issue 2, pp. 157-165
31. Solove, D.J., 2008. Understanding Privacy. Harvard.
32. Camenisch, J. & Van Herreweghen, E., 2002, Design and implementation of the idemix anonymous credential system, Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, ACM, pp. 30.
33. Information Commissioner's Office (2008) "Privacy by Design" available from: http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/pdb-report-html/index. html (last accessed 5th August 2010)