Does computer-assisted surgery benefit leg length restoration in total hip replacement? Navigation versus conventional freehand

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 19-24

  Manzotti, Alfonso ^a   Cerveri, Pietro ^b   De Momi, Elena ^b   Pullen, Chris ^c   Confalonieri, Norberto ^a  

^a CTO Hospital   (Italy)

^b POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^c ROYAL MELBOURNE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP; HUMAN; IMPLANT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEG LENGTH INEQUALITY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHRITIS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP DISLOCATION, CONGENITAL; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; LEG LENGTH INEQUALITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78751621406     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0903-1     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. RL Barrak 2003 Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation J Am Acad Orthop Surg 11 89 99
2. N Bellamy 2002 WOMAC: a 20-year experiential review of a patient-centered self-reported health status questionnaire J Rheumatol 29 2473 2476 12465137
3. A Braun D Lazovic R Zigan 2007 Modular short-stem prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty: implant positioning and the influence of navigation Orthopedics 30 10 Suppl S148 S152 17983119
4. CR Clark HD Huddleston EP Schoch 3rd BJ Thomas 2006 Leg-length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty J Am Acad Orthop Surg 14 1 38 45 16394166
5. Confalonieri N, Manzotti A, Montironi F, Pullen C (2008) Leg length discrepancy, dislocation rate, and offset in total hip replacement using a short modular stem: navigation vs conventional freehand. Orthopedics 31(10 Suppl 1):pii: orthosupersite.com/view.asp?rID=35541
6. JF Crowe VJ Mani CS Ranawat 1979 Total hip replacement in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip J Bone Joint Surg Am 61 1 15 23 1:STN:280:DyaE1M%2FovVOntA%3D%3D 365863
7. R Gandhi A Marchie F Farrokhyar N Mahomed 2009 Computer navigation in total hip replacement: a meta-analysis Int Orthop 33 3 593 597 10.1007/s00264-008-0539-6 18386003
8. JP Gofton 1971 Studies in osteoarthritis of the hip. IV. Biomechanics and clinical considerations Can Med Assoc J 104 11 1007 1011 1:STN:280: DyaE3M7ovFKltA%3D%3D 5576039
9. RGA Haaker K Tiedjen A Ottersbach F Rubenthaler M Stockheim JB Stiehl 2007 Comparison of conventional versus computer-navigated acetabular component insertion J Arthroplasty 22 2 151 159 10.1016/j.arth.2005.10.018 17275626 (Pubitemid 46172521)
10. LI Havelin LB Engesaeter B Espehaug O Furnes SA Lie SE Vollset 2000 The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties Acta Orthop Scand 71 337 353 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvnslGisw%3D%3D 10.1080/000164700317393321 11028881
11. T Kalteis M Handel H Bäthis L Perlick M Tingart J Grifka 2006 Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: is it as accurate as CT-based navigation? J Bone Joint Surg 88 2 163 167 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28%2FksFyjuw%3D%3D 10.1302/0301-620X.88B2.17163 (Pubitemid 43279924)
12. T Kalteis M Handel T Herold L Perlick H Baethis J Grifka 2005 Greater accuracy in positioning of the acetabular cup by using an image-free navigation system Int Orthop 29 5 272 276 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MrksFCnsw%3D%3D 10.1007/s00264-005-0671-5 16082540 (Pubitemid 41442869)
13. JH Kellgren JS Lawrence 1957 Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis Ann Rheum Dis 16 494 502 1:STN:280:DyaG1c%2FktFeltQ%3D%3D 10.1136/ard.16.4.494 13498604
14. A Konyves GC Bannister 2005 The importance of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 2 155 157 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7gs1emtQ%3D%3D 10.1302/0301-620X.87B2.14878 15736733 (Pubitemid 40278011)
15. JY Jenny C Boeri JC Dosch M Uscatu E Ciobanu 2009 Navigated non-image-based positioning of the acetabulum during total hip replacement Int Orthop 33 1 83 87 10.1007/s00264-007-0479-6 18004568
16. D Lazovic N Kaib 2005 Results with navigated bicontact total hip arthroplasty Orthopedics 28 10 Suppl S1227 S1233 16235445
17. D Lazovic R Zigan 2006 Navigation of short-stem implants Orthopedics 29 10 Suppl S125 S129 17407937
18. Mainard D (2008) Navigated and nonnavigated total hip arthroplasty: results of two consecutive series using a cementless straight hip stem. Orthopedics 31(10 Suppl 1): pii: orthosupersite.com/view.asp?rID=35528
19. A Malik A Maheshwari LD Dorr 2007 Impingement with total hip replacement J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 1832 1842 10.2106/JBJS.F.01313 17671025 (Pubitemid 47229894)
20. K Matsuda S Nakamura T Matsushita 2006 A simple method to minimize limb-length discrepancy after hip arthroplasty Acta Orthop 77 3 375 379 10.1080/17453670610046280 16819674 (Pubitemid 43977391)
21. M Nogler O Kessler A Prassl B Donnely R Streicher JB Sledge M Krismer 2004 Reduced variability of acetabular cup positioning with use of an imageless navigation system Clin Orthop Relat Res 426 159 163 10.1097/01.blo.0000141902. 30946.6d 15346068 (Pubitemid 39167124)
22. P Lakshmanan SM Ahmed RG Hansford DJ Woodnutt 2008 Achieving the required medial offset and limb length in total hip arthroplasty Acta Orthop Belg 74 49 53 18411601
23. S Paratte JN Argenson 2007 Validation and usefulness of a computer-assisted cup-positioning system in total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, controlled study J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 3 494 499 10.2106/JBJS.F.00529 (Pubitemid 46365349)
24. J Parvizi PF Sharkey GA Bissett RH Rothman WJ Hozack 2003 Surgical treatment of limb-length discrepancy following total hip arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A 12 2310 2317 14668499
25. T Renkawitz E Sendtner J Grifka J Kalteis 2008 Accuracy of imageless stem navigation during simulated total hip arthroplasty Acta Orthop 79 6 785 788 10.1080/17453670810016858 19085495
26. T Renkawitz T Schuster T Herold H Goessmann E Sendtner J Grifta J Kalteis 2009 Measuring leg length and offset with an imageless navigation system during total hip arthroplasty: is it really accurate? Int J Med Robot 5 2 192 197 19253907
27. HE Rubash HK Parvataneni 2007 The pants too short, the leg too long: leg length inequality after THA Orthopedics 30 764 765 17899929
28. VK Sarin WR Pratt GW Bradley 2005 Accurate femur repositioning is critical during intraoperative total hip arthroplasty length and offset assessment J Arthroplasty 20 7 887 891 10.1016/j.arth.2004.07.001 16230240 (Pubitemid 41463689)
29. SS Sathappan ML Teicher C Capeci M Yoon BR Wasserman WL Jaffe 2007 Clinical outcome of total hip arthroplasty using the normalized and proportionalized femoral stem with a minimum 20-year follow-up J Arthroplasty 22 3 356 362 10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.004 17400091 (Pubitemid 46484002)
30. K Shiramizu M Naito T Shitama Y Nakamura H Shitama 2004 L-shaped caliper for limb length measurement during total hip arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 966 969 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cvnvVCjtQ%3D%3D 10.1302/0301-620X.86B7.14587 15446519 (Pubitemid 39255857)
31. I Takigami M Itokazu Y Itoh K Mtasumoto T Yamamoto K Shimizu 2008 Limb-length measurement in total hip arthroplasty using a calipers dual pin retractor Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 66 2 107 110 18537779
32. TO White TW Dougall 2002 Arthroplasty of the hip. Leg length is not important J Bone Joint Surg Br 84 3 335 338 1:STN:280:DC%2BD383mt1yktQ%3D%3D 10.1302/0301-620X.84B3.12460 12002488
33. RL Wixson 2008 Computer-assisted total hip navigation Instr Course Lect 57 707 720 18399618
34. V Wylde SL Whitehouse AH Taylor GT Pattison GC Bannister AW Blom 2009 Prevalence and functional impact of patient-perceived leg length discrepancy after hip replacement Int Orthop 33 4 905 909 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MrgsFCrsw%3D%3D 10.1007/s00264-008-0563-6 18437379