The relationship between a silent reading fluency instructional protocol on students' reading comprehension and achievement in an urban school setting

Reading Psychology

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 75-97

  Rasinski, Timothy ^a   Samuels, S Jay ^b   Hiebert, Elfrieda ^c   Petscher, Yaacov ^d   Feller, Karen ^e  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Educational Endeavors   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78751605475     PISSN: 02702711     EISSN: 15210685     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02702710903346873     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Allington, R. L. (1983). Fluency: The neglected goal of the reading program. The Reading Teacher, 36, 556-561.
2. Allington, R. L. (2006). What really matters for struggling readers: Designing researchbased programs (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
3. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 57, 289-300.
4. Buck, J., & Torgesen, J. (2003). The relationship between performance on a measure of oral reading fluency and performance on the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (Tech. Rep. No. 1). Tallahassee, FL: Florida Center for Reading Research.
5. Chall, J. S. (1996). Stages of reading development (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt-Brace.
6. Chard, D. J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386-406.
7. Chinn, C. A., Waggoner, M. A., Anderson, R. C., Schommer, M., & Wilkinson, I. A. (1993). Situated action in the small-group reading lesson: A microanalysisof oral reading error episodes. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 361-392.
8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Cronbach, L., & Furby, L. (1970). How we should measure "change": Or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68-80.
10. Eder, D., & Felmlee, D. (1984). The development of attention norms in ability groups. In P. L. Peterson, L. C. Wilkinson, and M. Hallinan (Eds.), The social context of instruction: Group organization and group processes (pp. 189-208). New York, NY: Academic Press.
11. Hiebert, E. H. (1983). An examination of ability grouping for reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 18(3), 231-255.
12. Hill, C. J., Bloom, H. S., Black, A. R., & Lipsey, M. W. (2008). Empirical benchmarks for interpreting effect sizes in research. Child Development Perspectives, 2(3), 172-177.
13. Hoffman, J. V., & Clements, R. (1984). Reading miscues and teacher verbal feedback. Elementary School Journal, 84, 423-439.
14. Huck, S. W., & McLean, R. A. (1975). Using a repeated measures ANOVA to analyze the data from a pretest-posttest design: A potentially confusing task. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 511-518.
15. Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 3-21.
16. Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (2004). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Mirsky, A. F. (1999). Disorders of attention: A neuropsychological perspective. In G. R. Lyon & N. A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Attention, memory, and executive function (2nd printing, pp. 71-96). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
18. National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to reading. Report of the subgroups. Washington, DC: United States Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health.
19. Pikulski, J. J., & Chard, D. J. (2005). Fluency: Bridge between decoding and reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 58(6), 510-519.
20. Rashotte, C. A., MacPhee, K., & Torgesen, J. K. (2001). The effectiveness of a group reading instruction program with poor readers in multiple grades. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24(2), 119-134.
21. Rasinski, T. V. (2003). The fluent reader: Oral reading strategies for building word recognition, fluency, and comprehension. New York, NY: Scholastic.
22. Rasinski, T. V. (2004). Assessing reading fluency. Honolulu, HI: Pacific Resources for Education and Learning. Retrieved from http://www.prel.org
23. Rasinski, T. V. (2006). Reading fluency instruction: Moving beyond accuracy, automaticity, and prosody. The Reading Teacher, 59, 704-706.
24. Rasinski, T. V., & Hoffman, J. V. (2003). Theory and research into practice: Oral reading in the school literacy curriculum. Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 510-522.
25. Rasinski, T. V., Padak, N. D., Linek, W. L., & Sturtevant, E. (1994). Effects of fluency development on urban second-grade readers. Journal of Educational Research, 87, 158-165.
26. Rasinski, T. V., Padak, N., McKeon, C., Krug-Wilfong, L., Friedauer, J., & Heim, P. (2005). Is reading fluency a key for successful high school reading? Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 49, 22-27.
27. Rasinski, T. V., Rikli, A., & Johnston, S. (2009). Reading fluency: More than automaticity? More than a concern for the primary grades? Literacy Research and Instruction, 48, 350-361.
28. Rasinski, T. V., & Stevenson, B. (2005). The effects of Fast Start Reading, a fluency based home involvement reading program, on the reading achievement of beginning readers. Reading Psychology, 26, 109-125.
29. Rasinski, T. V., & Zutell, J. B. (1996). Is fluency yet a goal of the reading curriculum? In E. G. Sturtevant and W. M. Linek (Eds.), Growing literacy (18th yearbook of the College Reading Association, pp. 237-246). Harrisonburg, VA: College Reading Association.
30. Renaissance Learning. (1996). Accelerated Reading. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Renaissance Learning.
31. Reutzel, D. R., Jones, C. D., Fawson, P. C., & Smith, J. C. (2008). Scaffolded silent reading: A complement to guided repeated oral reading that works! The Reading Teacher, 62, 194-207.
32. Roehrig, A., Petscher, Y., Nettles, S., Hudson, R., & Torgesen, J. (2008). Accuracy of the DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency measure for predicting third grade reading comprehension outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 343-366.
33. Rogosa, D. R. (1995). Myths and methods: Myths about longitudinal research plus supplemental questions. In J. M. Gottman (Ed.), The analysis of change (pp. 3-66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Schatschneider, C., Buck, J., Torgesen, J., Wagner, R., Hassler, L., Hecht, S., & Powell-Smith, K. (2004). A multivariate study of individual differences in performance on the Reading portion of the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test: A preliminary report (Tech. Rep. #5). Tallahassee, FL: Florida Center for Reading Research.
35. Scholastic Inc. (n.d.). Read 180. New York, NY: Scholastic.
36. Stahl, S., & Heubach, K. (2005). Fluency-oriented reading instruction. Journal of Literacy Research, 37, 25-60.
37. Torgesen, J. K. & Hudson, R. F. (2006). Reading fluency: Critical issues for struggling readers. In S. J. Samuels and A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about fluency instruction (pp. 130-158). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
38. Torgesen, J., Nettles, S., Howard, P., & Winterbottom, R. (2005). Brief report of a study to investigate the relationship between several brief measures of reading fluency and performance on the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test-Reading in 4th, 6th, 8th, and 10th grades (Tech. Rep. #6). Tallahassee, FL: Florida Center for Reading Research.
39. Wexler, J., Vaughn, S., Edmonds, M., & Reutebuch, C. K. (2008). A synthesis of fluency interventions for secondary struggling readers. Reading and Writing, 21(4), 317-347.