Stimulation of the young poor responder: Comparison of the luteal estradiol/gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist priming protocol versus oral contraceptive microdose leuprolide

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 95, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 592-595

  Shastri, Shefali M ^a   Barbieri, Elizabeth ^b   Kligman, Isaac ^c   Schoyer, Katherine D ^c   Davis, Owen K ^c   Rosenwaks, Zev ^c  

^a REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE ASSOCIATES OF NEW JERSEY   (United States)

^b Oregon Reproductive Medicine   (United States)

^c WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Estrogen priming; GnRH antagonist; IVF failure; poor responder

Indexed keywords

ANTIESTROGEN; GONADORELIN ANTAGONIST; LEUPRORELIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; LOW DRUG DOSE; LUTEAL PHASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MENSTRUAL CYCLE; OOCYTE RETRIEVAL; OVULATION INDUCTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADMINISTRATION, ORAL; ADULT; COHORT STUDIES; CONTRACEPTIVES, ORAL, HORMONAL; DOSAGE FORMS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DRUG ADMINISTRATION SCHEDULE; ESTRADIOL; FEMALE; FERTILITY AGENTS, FEMALE; GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING HORMONE; HORMONE ANTAGONISTS; HUMANS; LEUPROLIDE; LUTEAL PHASE; OVULATION INDUCTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT FAILURE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78751593323     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. B.C. Tarlatzis, L. Zepiridis, G. Grimbizis, and J. Bontis Clinical management of low ovarian response to stimulation for IVF: a systemic review Hum Reprod Update 9 2003 61 76
2. J. Garcia, G.S. Jones, A.A. Acosta, and G.L. Wright Jr. Corpus luteum function after follicle aspiration for oocyte retrieval Fertil Steril 36 1981 565 572
3. V. Karande, R. Morris, J. Rinehart, C. Miller, R. Rao, and N. Gleicher Limited success using the "flare" protocol in poor responders in cycles with low basal follicle-stimulating hormone levels during in vitro fertilization Fertil Steril 67 1997 900 903
4. M. Schachter, F. Friedler, A. Raziel, D. Strassburger, O. Bern, and R. Ron-El Improvement of IVF outcome in poor responders by discontinuation of GnRH analogue during the gonadotropin stimulation phase: a function of improved embryo quality J Assist Reprod and Genetics 18 2001 199 206
5. A.G. Shaker, R. Fleming, M.E. Jamieson, R.W. Yates, and J.R. Coutts Absence of effect of adjuvant growth hormone therapy on follicular responses to exogenous gonadotropins in women: normal and poor responders Fertil Steril 58 1992 919 923
6. J.A. Land, M.I. Yarmolinskaya, J.C. Dumoulin, and J.L. Evers High-dose human menopausal gonadotropin stimulation in poor responders does not improve in vitro fertilization outcome Fertil Steril 65 1996 961 965
7. E.S. Surrey, and W.B. Schoolcraft Evaluating strategies for improving ovarian response of the poor responder undergoing assisted reproductive techniques Fertil Steril 73 2000 667 676
8. R.T. Scott, and D. Navot Enhancement of ovarian responsiveness with microdoses of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist during ovulation induction for in vitro fertilization Fertil Steril 61 1994 880 885
9. W.B. Schoolcraft, T. Schlenker, M. Gee, J. Stevens, and L. Wagley Improved controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in poor responder in vitro fertilization patients with a microdose follicle stimulating hormone flare, growth hormone protocol Fertil Steril 67 1997 93 97
10. F. Olivennes, J.S. Cunha-Filho, R. Fanchin, P. Bouchard, and R. Frydman The use of GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation Hum Reprod Update 8 2002 279 290
11. M.A. Akman, H.F. Erden, S.B. Tosun, N. Bayazit, E. Aksoy, and M. Bahceci Comparison of agonistic flare-up protocol and antagonistic multiple dose protocol in ovarian stimulation of poor responders: results of a randomized prospective trial Hum Reprod 16 2001 868 870
12. R. Fanchin, L. Salomon, A. Castelo-Branco, F. Olivennes, N. Frydman, and R. Frydman Luteal estradiol pre-treatment coordinates follicular growth during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists Hum Reprod 18 2003 2698 2703
13. D. De Ziegler, A.S. Jaaskelainen, P.A. Brioschi, R. Fanchin, and C. Bulletti Synchronization of endogenous and exogenous FSH stimuli in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) Hum Reprod 13 1998 561 564
14. K.G. Dragisic, O.K. Davis, S.J. Fasouliotis, and Z. Rosenwaks Use of luteal estradiol patch and a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist suppression protocol before gonadotropin stimulation for in vitro fertilization in poor responders Fertil Steril 84 2005 1023 1025
15. L.L. Veeck The morphological assessment of human oocytes and early conception B.A. Keel, R.W. Webster, Handbook of the laboratory diagnosis and treatment of infertility 1990 CRC Press Boca Raton, FL 353 369
16. R. Fanchin, J.S. Cunha-Filho, L.M. Schonauer, I.J. Kadoch, P. Cohen-Bacri, and R. Frydman Coordination of early antral follicles by luteal estradiol administration provides a basis for alternative controlled ovarian hyperstimulation regimens Fertil Steril 79 2003 316 321
17. R. Fanchin, A.C. Branco, I.J. Kadoch, G. Hosny, M. Bagirova, and R. Frydman Premenstrual administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist coordinates early antral follicle sizes and sets up the basis for an innovative concept of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation Fertil Steril 81 2004 1554 1559
18. J.L. Frattarelli, M.J. Hill, G.D.E. McWilliams, K.A. Miller, P.A. Bergh, and R.T. Scott A luteal estradiol protocol for expected poor responders improves embryo number and quality Fertil Steril 89 2008 1118 1122
19. V. Weitzman, L. Engmann, A. DiLuigi, D. Maier, J. Nulsen, and C. Benadiva Comparison of luteal estradiol patch and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist suppression protocol before gonadotropin stimulation versus microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol for patients with a history of poor in vitro fertilization outcomes Fertil Steril 92 2009 226 230