Optimal redistribution of the background ozone monitoring stations over France

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 772-783

  Wu, Lin ^a,b   Bocquet, Marc ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE L'OUEST   (France)

^b INRIA   (France)

Author keywords

Air quality; Network design; Ozone monitoring

Indexed keywords

AIR POLLUTANTS; CHEMISTRY TRANSPORT MODEL; DESIGN CRITERION; DESIGN DOMAINS; DESIGN OBJECTIVES; EXTRAPOLATION METHODS; GEOSTATISTICAL; GRID NODE; GROUND LEVEL; MONITORING NETWORK; MONITORING STATIONS; NETWORK DESIGN; NETWORK DESIGN PROBLEMS; NETWORK STATIONS; OPTIMAL NETWORKS; OPTIMAL POSITIONING; OZONE ESTIMATION; OZONE FIELDS; OZONE MONITORING; OZONE VARIATION; PHYSICAL CRITERIONS; POLLUTION MONITORING NETWORKS; REGULAR GRIDS; SPATIAL SCALE; STOCHASTIC OPTIMIZATION METHODS; THEORETICAL ERRORS;

AGGLOMERATION; AIR QUALITY; DESIGN; EXTRAPOLATION; MONITORING; OZONE; POLLUTION; SIMULATED ANNEALING;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

OZONE;

AIR QUALITY; ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY; ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); ERROR CORRECTION; GEOSTATISTICS; OPTIMIZATION; OZONE; POLLUTION MONITORING; RECONSTRUCTION; SIMULATED ANNEALING;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FRANCE; GEOSTATISTICAL ANALYSIS; HUMAN; POLLUTION MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; STOCHASTIC MODEL;

FRANCE;

EID: 78751575783     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.08.038     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abida R., Bocquet M. Targeting of observations for accidental atmospheric release monitoring. Atmos. Env. 2009, 43:6312-6327.
2. Abida R., Bocquet M., Vercauteren N., Isnard O. Design of a monitoring network over France in case of a radiological accidental release. Atmos. Env. 2008, 42:5205-5219.
3. Berliner L.M., Lu Z.-Q., Snyder C. Statistical design for adaptive weather observations. J. Atmos. Sci. August 1999, 56:2536-2552.
4. Blond N., Bel L., Vautard R. Three-dimensional ozone data analysis with an air quality model over the Paris area. J. Geophys. Res. 2003, 108:D23.
5. Boutahar J., Lacour S., Mallet V., Quélo D., Roustan Y., Sportisse B. Development and validation of a fully modular platform for numerical modelling of air pollution: POLAIR. Int. J. Env. Pollut. 2004, 22(1/2):17-28.
6. Cressie N.A.C. Statistics for Spatial Data, Revised Edition 1993, Wiley, New York.
7. Debry E., Fahey K., Sartelet K., Sportisse B., Tombette M. Technical Note: a new SIze REsolved Aerosol Model (SIREAM). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2007, 7:1,537-1,547.
8. Elbern H., Schmidt H. Ozone episode analysis by four-dimensional variational chemistry data assimilation. J. Geophys. Res. 2001, 106(D4):3,569-3,590.
9. Fedorov V.V., Hackl P. Optimal experimental design: spatial sampling. Calcutta Stat. Assoc. 1994, 44:57-81.
10. Fuentes M., Chaudhuri A., Holland D.M. Bayesian entropy for spatial sampling design of environmental data. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 2007, 14:323-340.
11. Hourdin F., Musat I., Bony S., Braconnot P., Codron F., Dufresne J.-L., Fairhead L., Filiberti M.-A., Friedlingstein P., Grandpeix J.-Y., Krinner G., LeVan P., Li Z.-X., Lott F. The LMDZ4 general circulation model: climate performance and sensitivity to parametrized physics with emphasis on tropical convection. Clim. Dynam. 2006, 27(7-8):787-813.
12. Johnson M.E., Moore L.M., Ylvisaker D. Minimax and maximin distance designs. J. Stat. Plan. Infer. 1990, 26:131-148.
13. Kirkpatrick S., Gelatt C.D., Vecchi M.P. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 1983, 220:671-680.
14. Le N.D., Zidek J.V. Statistical Analysis of Environmental Space-time Processes. Springer Series in Statistics 2006, Springer.
15. Lee Y.-M., Ellis J.H. On the equivalence of kriging and maximum entropy estimators. Math. Geol. 1997, 29(1):131-152.
16. Malherbe L., Cárdenas G., Colin P., Yahyaoui A. Using different spatial scale measurements in a geostatistically based approach for mapping atmospheric nitrogen dioxide concentrations. Application to the French Centre region. Environmetrics 2008, 19:751-764.
17. Mallet V., Quélo D., Sportisse B., Ahmed de Biasi M., Debry É, Korsakissok I., Wu L., Roustan Y., Sartelet K., Tombette M., Foudhil H. Technical note: the air quality modeling system Polyphemus. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2007, 7(20):5,479-5,487.
18. Meng Z., Dabdub D., Seinfeld J.H. Chemical coupling between atmospheric ozone and particulate matter. Science 1997, 277:116-119.
19. Metropolis N., Rosenbluth A., Rosenbluth M., Teller A., Teller E. Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 1953, 21:1087-1092.
20. Middleton P., Stockwell W.R., Carter W.P.L. Aggregation and analysis of volatile organic compound emissions for regional modeling. Atmos. Env. 1990, 24A(5):1,107-1,133.
21. Müller W.G. Collecting Spatial Data: Optimum Design of Experiments for Random Fields 2007, Springer-Verlag. third ed.
22. Nychka D., Saltzman N. Design of air quality monitoring networks. Case Studies in Environmental Statistics. Lecture Notes in Statistics 120 1998, 51-76. Springer-Verlag. D. Nychka, L. Cox, W. Piegorsch (Eds.).
23. Pleijel H., Danielsson H., Emberson L., Ashmore M., Mills G. Ozone risk assessment for agricultural crops in Europe: further development of stomatal flux and flux response relationships for European wheat and potato. Atmos. Env. 2007, 41:3022-3040.
24. 2 observing networks in the presence of model error: results from transcom 3. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2004, 4:413-421.
25. Reed P., Minsker B.S., Goldberg D.E. Simplifying multiobjective optimization: an automated design methodology for the nondominated sorted genetic algorithm-II. Water Resour. Res. 2003, 39:1196.
26. Reynolds S.D., Roth P.M., Seinfeld J.H. Mathematical modeling of photochemical air pollution-I: formulation of the model. Atmos. Env. 1973, 7:1033-1061.
27. Russell A., Dennis R. NARSTO critical review of photochemical models and modeling. Atmos. Env. 2000, 34:2,283-2,324.
28. Sartelet K.N., Debry E., Fahey K., Roustan Y., Tombette M., Sportisse B. Simulation of aerosols and gas-phase species over Europe with the Polyphemus system: Part I-Model-to-data comparison for 2001. Atmos. Env. 2007, 41:6,116-6,131.
29. Saunier O., Bocquet M., Mathieu A., Isnard O. Model reduction via principal component truncation for the optimal design of atmospheric monitoring networks. Atmos. Env. 2009, 43:4940-4950.
30. Seinfeld J.H. Ozone air quality models: a critical review. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 1988, 38:616-645.
31. Silvey S.D. Optimal Design 1980, Chapman end Hall.
32. Simpson D., Winiwarter W., Börjesson G., Cinderby S., Ferreiro A., Guenther A., Hewitt C.N., Janson R., Khalil M.A.K., Owen S., Pierce T.E., Puxbaum H., Shearer M., Skiba U., Steinbrecher R., Tarrasón L., Öquist M.G. Inventorying emissions from nature in Europe. J. Geophys. Res. 1999, 104(D7):8,113-8,152.
33. Sportisse B. A review of parameterizations for modelling dry deposition and scavenging of radionuclides. Atmos. Env. 2007, 41:2,683-2,698.
34. Stockwell W.R., Kirchner F., Kuhn M., Seefeld S. A new mechanism for regional atmospheric chemistry modeling. J. Geophys. Res. 1997, 102(D22):25,847-25,879.
35. Troen I., Mahrt L. A simple model of the atmospheric boundary layer; sensitivity to surface evaporation. Boundary-Layer Meteor. 1986, 37:129-148.
36. van Groenigen J.W., Stein A. Constrained optimization of spatial sampling using continuous simulated annealing. J. Environ. Qual. 1998, 27:1078-1086.
37. Verwer J.G., Hundsdorfer W., Blom J.G. Numerical time integration for air pollution models. Surv. Math. for Indus 2002, 10:107-174.
38. Wu L., Bocquet M., Chevallier M. Optimal reduction of the ozone monitoring network over France. Atmos. Env. 2010, 44:3071-3083.
39. Wu L., Mallet V., Bocquet M., Sportisse B. A comparison study of data assimilation algorithms for ozone forecasts. J. Geophys. Res. 2008, 113(D20310).
40. Zhang L., Brook J.R., Vet R. A revised parameterization for gaseous dry deposition in air-quality models. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2003, 3:2,067-2,082.
41. Zimmerman D.L. Optimal network design for spatial prediction, covariance parameter estimation, and empirical prediction. Environmetrics 2006, 17:635-652.