Implementation of a journal peer reviewer stratification system based on quality and reliability

Annals of Emergency Medicine

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Green, Steven M ^a,b   Callaham, Michael L ^a,c  

^a Annals of Emergency Medicine   (United States)

^b LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; HUMAN; JOB PERFORMANCE; PEER REVIEW; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; RELIABILITY; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE;

EID: 78751574079     PISSN: 01960644     EISSN: 10976760     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Journal Citation Reports 2008 ISI Web of Knowledge 2008 Thomson Reuters New York, NY
2. M.L. Callaham, W.G. Baxt, and J.F. Waeckerle Reliability of editors' subjective quality ratings of peer reviews of manuscripts JAMA 280 1998 229 231
3. S. van Rooyen, N. Black, and F. Godlee Development of the review quality instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts J Clin Epidemiol 52 1999 625 629
4. M.L. Callaham, R.K. Knopp, and E.J. Gallagher Effect of written feedback by editors on quality of reviews: two randomized trials JAMA 287 2002 2781 2783