Bipolar argumentation frameworks with specialized supports

Proceedings - International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, ICTAI

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 215-218

  Nouioua, Farid ^a   Risch, Vincent ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIV   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION; BIPOLAR ARGUMENTATION; LOGIC PROGRAMS; SUPPORT RELATIONS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; LOGIC PROGRAMMING; SEMANTICS;

PROGRAM TRANSLATORS;

EID: 78751520279     PISSN: 10823409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICTAI.2010.37     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. L. Amgoud, C. Cayrol, M.C. Lagasquie-Schiex and P. Livet, On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 23:1062-1093, 2008.
2. P. Baroni, M. Giacomin, On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics, Artificial Intelligence (Special issue on argumentation in A.I.), 171(10-15):675-700, 2007.
3. T. Bench-Capon, S. Doutre, P.E. Dune, Audiences in argumentation frameworks, Artificial Intelligence, 171(1):42-71, 2006.
4. M. Caminada, Semi-stable semantics, In: Computational Models of Argument, pp. 121-130. IOS Press, 2006.
5. C. Cayrol and M.C. Lagasquie-Schiex, On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks, In: European conference on symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning with uncertainty, pp. 378-389. Barcelona, Spain (2005).
6. C. Cayrol and M.C. Lagasquie-Schiex, Bipolar abstract argumentation systems, Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, I.Rahwan, G.R. Simari (Eds), Chapter 4, pages : 65-84, Springer, 2009.
7. S. Coste-Marquis and C. Devred and P. Marquis,Symmetric Argumentation Frameworks, In: 8th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, pp. 317-328, Springer, 2005.
8. S. Coste-Marquis and C. Devred and P. Marquis, Prudent semantics for argumentation frameworks, In: 12th IEEE ICTAI Conference, pp. 568-572. IEEE Computer Society, Hong Kong, China, 2005.
9. S. Coste-Marquis and C. Devred and P. Marquis, Constrained Argumentation Frameworks, In: 10th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 112-122, AAAI Press, Lake District, 2006.
10. P.M. Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence, 77(2):321-357, 1995.
11. P.M. Dung, P. Mancarella, F. Toni, A dialectic procedure for sceptical, assumption-based argumentation, In: 1st International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, pp.145-156, May 25, 2006.
12. M. Gelfond, V. Lifschitz, The stable model semantics for logic programming, In: 5th International Conference on Logic Programming, pp. 1070-1080, 1988.
13. M. Gelfond, V. Lifschitz, Classical negation in logic programs and disjunctive databases, New Generation Computing, 9:365-385, 1991.