Disgusting but harmless moral violations are perceived as harmful due to the negative emotions they elicit;Las transgresiones morales repulsivas pero inofensivas se perciben como dañinas debido a las emociones negativas que inducen

International Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 141-148

  Gutierrez, Roberto ^a   Giner Sorolla, Roger ^b  

^a ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anger; Disgust; Moral violation; Presumption of harm

Indexed keywords

EID: 78751510060     PISSN: 02134748     EISSN: 15793680     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1174/021347411794078381     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. DAMASIO, A. R. (1994). Descarte's error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. Londres: Papermac.
2. EKMAN, P. & FRIESEN, W. V. (1978). Facial Action Coding System. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychology Press Inc.
3. GUTIERREZ, R. & GINER SOROLLA, R-. (2007). Anger, disgust, and presumption of harm as reactions to taboo-breaking behaviors. Emotion, 7, 853-868.
4. HAIDT, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814-834.
5. HAIDT, J. (2003). The moral emotions. En R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852-870). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. HAIDT, J., BJORKLUND, F. & MURPHY, S. (2004). Moral dumbfounding: When intuition finds no reason. Charlottesville: University of Virginia.
7. HORBERG, E. J., OVEIS, C., KELTNER, D. & COHEN, A. B. (2009). Disgust and the moralization of purity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 963-976. Doi:10.1037/a0017423.
8. KAHAN, D. M. (1998). The Anatomy of Disgust in Criminal Law. Michigan Law Review, 96, 1621-1657.
9. KELTNER, D. & GROSS, J. J. (1999). Functional account of emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 467-480.
10. KOHLBERG, L. (1971). From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. En T. Mischel (Ed.), Cognitive development and epistemology (pp. 151-235). Nueva York: Academic Press.
11. PREACHER, K. J. & HAYES, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
12. ROZIN, P., HAIDT, J. & MCCAULEY, C. R. (1999). Disgust: The body and soul emotion. En T. Dalgleish & M. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 429-445). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
13. ROZIN, P., LOWERY, L., IMADA, S. & HAIDT, J. (1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 574-586.
14. SHWEDER, R. A., MUNCH, N. C., MAHAPTRA, M. & PARK, L. (1997). The "big three" of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the 'big three" explanations of suffering. En P. Rozin & A. Brandt (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 119-169). Nueva York: Routledge.
15. SIMPSON, J., CARTER, S., ANTHONY, S. H. & OVERTON, P. G. (2006). Is disgust a homogeneous emotion? Motivation and emotion, 30, 31-41.