The uneven pace of change in heterosexual romantic relationships: Comment on England

Gender and Society

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 101-107

  Graf, Nikki L ^a   Schwartz, Christine R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78751484469     PISSN: 08912432     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0891243210390356     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bianchi, Suzanne M., Melissa A. Milkie, Liana C. Sayer, and John P. Robinson. 2000. Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces 79:191-228.
2. Brines, Julie, and Kara Joyner. 1999. The ties that bind: Principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage. American Sociological Review 64:333-55.
3. Bumpass, Larry L., James A. Sweet, and Andrew Cherlin. 1991. The role of cohabitation in declining rates of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family 53:913-27.
4. Buss, David M., Todd K. Shackelford, Lee A. Kirkpatrick, and Randy J. Larsen. 2001. A half century of mate preferences: The cultural evolution of values. Journal of Marriage and Family 63:491-503.
5. Cha, Youngjoo, and Sarah Thébaud. 2009. Labor markets, breadwinning, and beliefs: How economic context shapes men's gender ideology. Gender & Society 23:215-43.
6. Ciabattari, Teresa. 2001. Changes in men's conservative gender ideologies: Cohort and period influences. Gender & Society 15:574-91.
7. Coltrane, Scott. 2000. Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family 62:1208-33.
8. England, Paula. 2010. The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender & Society 24:149-66.
9. Fisman, Raymond, Sheena S. Iyengar, Emir Kamenica, and Itamar Simonson. 2006. Gender differences in mate selection: Evidence from a speed dating experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 121:673-97.
10. Galinsky, Ellen, Kerstin Aumann, and James T. Bond. 2009. Times are changing: Gender and generation at work and at home. New York: Families and Work Institute.
11. Gerson, Kathleen. 2010. The unfinished revolution: How a new generation is reshaping family, work, and gender in America. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12. Goldstein, Joshua R., and Catherine T. Kenney. 2001. Marriage delayed or marriage forgone? New cohort forecasts of first marriage for U.S. women. American Sociological Review 66:506-19.
13. Raley, Sara B., Marybeth J. Mattingly, and Suzanne M. Bianchi. 2006. How dual are dual-income couples? Documenting change from 1970 to 2001. Journal of Marriage and Family 68:11-28.
14. Schwartz, Christine R. 2010. Earnings inequality and the changing association between spouses' earnings. American Journal of Sociology 115:1524-57.
15. Schwartz, Christine R., and Robert D. Mare. 2005. Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003. Demography 42:621-46.
16. Sweeney, Megan M., and Maria Cancian. 2004. The changing importance of white women's economic prospects for assortative mating. Journal of Marriage and Family 66:1015-28.
17. Tichenor, Veronica. 2005. Maintaining men's dominance: Negotiating identity and power when she earns more. Sex Roles 53:191-205.
18. Willinger, Beth. 1993. Resistance and change: College men's attitudes toward family and work in the 1980s. In Men, work, and family, edited by J. C. Hood, 108-30. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.