Motion analysis in sports monitoring techniques: Assessment protocols and application to racewalking;Monitoraggio del gesto sportivo con tecniche di motion analysis: Protocolli di valutazione e applicazione alia mareia agonistica

Medicina dello Sport

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 327-342

  Preatoni, E ^a   Torre, A L A ^b   Santambrocio, G C ^a   Rodano, R ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Motion; Racewalking

Indexed keywords

EID: 78751472625     PISSN: 00257826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Hatze, H. Motion variability - its definition, quantification, and origin. J Mot Behav 1986;18:5-16.
2. Bates BT. Single-subject methodology: An alternative approach. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996;28:631-8.
3. Bartlett RM. Current issues in the mechanics of athletic activities. A position paper. J Biomech 1997;30:477-86.
4. Bates BT, James CR, Dufek JS. Singlesubject analysis. In: Stergiou N, editor. Innovative analysis of human movement. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2004. p. 3-28.
5. James CR. Considerations of movement variability in biomechanics research. In: Stergiou N, editor. Innovative analysis of human movement. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2004. p. 29-62.
6. Müller M, Sternad D. Decomposition of variability in the execution of goaloriented tasks: Three components of skill improvement. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2004;30:212-33.
7. Hamill J, Haddad JM, Van Emmerik REA. Using coordination measures for movement analysis. In: Wang Q, editor. Proceedings of the XXIII International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports, Beijing, China. The China Institute of Sport Science 2005:33-8.
8. Newell KM, Deutsch KM, Sosnoff JJ, Mayer-Kress G. Variability in motor output as noise: a default and erroneous proposition?. In: Davids K, Bennett S, Newell KM, editors. Movement system variability. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2006. p. 3-23.
9. Bartlett R, Wheat J, Robins M. Is movement variability important for sports biomechanists? Sports Biomechanics 2007;6:224-43.
10. Preatoni E. Innovative methods for the analysis of sports movements and for the longitudinal monitoring of individual motor skills [doctoral dissertation]. Milano, Italy: Politecnico di Milano; 2007. p. 150.
11. Glazier PS, Wheat JS, Pease DL, Banletl RM. The interface of biomechanics and motor control: Dynamic Systems Theory and the functional role of movement variability. In: Davids K, Bennett S, Newell KM, editors. Movement system variability. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2006. p. 49-69.
12. Winter DA. Kinematic and kinetic patterns in human gait: variability and compensating effects. Human Movement Science 1984;3:51-76.
13. Hamill J, McNiven SL. Reliability of selected ground reaction force parameters during walking. Human Movement Science 1990;9:117-31.
14. Bates BT, Dufek JS, Davis HP. The effect of trial size on statistical power. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992;24:1059-65.
15. Rodano R, Squadrone R. Stability of selected lower limb joint kinetic parameters during vertical jump. J Appl Biomech 2002;18:83-9.
16. Chau T, Redekop S. Managing variability in the summary and comparison of gait data. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2005;2:22.
17. Schmidt RA, Wrisberg CA. Motor learning and performance. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2004.
18. International Association of Athletics Federations (LAAF). Rule 230: Race Walking. IAAF Competition Rules 2008 [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2008 February 5]. Available from: http://www.iaaf.org/competitions/technical/regulations/index. html.
19. Frigo C, Rabuffetti M, Kerrigan DC, Deming LC, Pedotti A. Functionally oriented and clinically feasible quantitative gait analysis method. Med Biol Eng Comput 1998;36:179-85.
20. James CR, Herman JA, Dufek JS, Bates BT. Number of trials necessary to achieve performance stability of selected ground reaction force variables during landing. J Sci Med Sport 2007;6:126-34.
21. Pedotti A, Frigo C. Quantitative analysis of locomotion for basic research and clinical applications. Fund Neurol 1992;7(4 Suppl.):47-56.
22. D'Amico M, Ferrigno G. Technique for the evaluation of derivatives from noisy biomechanical displacement data using a model-based bandwidth-selection procedure. Med Biol Eng Comput 1990;28:407-15.
23. Benedetti MG, Catani F, Leardini A, Pignotti E, Giannini S. Data management in gait analysis for clinical applications. Clin Biomech 1998;13:204-15.
24. Diss CE. The reliability of kinetic and kinematic variables used to analyse normal running gait. Gait and Posture 2001;14:98-103.
25. Murray MP, Guten GN, Mollinger LA, Gardner GM. Kinematic and electromyographic patterns of Olympic race walkers. Am J Sports Med 1983;11:68-74.
26. Cairns MA, Burden RG, Pisciotta JC, Simon SR. A biomechanical analysis of racewalking gait. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1986;18:446-53.
27. Growney E, Meglan D, Johnson M, Cahalan T, An K-N. Repeated measures of adult normal walking using a video tracking system. Gait Posture 1997;6:147-62.
28. Queen RM, Gross MT, Liu H. Repeatability of lower extremity kinetics and kinematics for standardized and selfselected running speeds. Gait Posture 2006;23:282-7.
29. Ferber R, Davis IM, Williams DS, Laughton C. A comparison of within- and between-day reliability of discrete 3D lower extremity variables in runners. J Orthop Res 2002;20:1139-45.
30. Bates BT, Osternig LR, Sawhill JA, James SL. An assessment of subject variability, subject-shoe interaction, and the evaluation of running shoes using ground reaction force data. J Biomech 1983;16:181-91.
31. DeVita P, Bates PT. Intraday reliability of ground reaction force data. Hum Mov Sci 1988;7:73-85.
32. Chau T, Parker K. On the robustness of stride frequency estimation. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 2004;51-294-303.
33. Liebermann DG, Katz L, Hughes MD, Bartlett RM, McClements J, Franks IM. Advances in the application of information technology to sport performance. J Sports Sci 2002;20:755-69.