Counterfactual Potency

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 100, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 30-46

  Petrocelli, John V ^a   Percy, Elise J ^b   Sherman, Steven J ^b   Tormala, Zakary L ^c  

^a WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Counterfactual potency; Counterfactual thinking; Metacognition; Probability; Regret

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONCEPT FORMATION; DECISION MAKING; EMOTION; GAME; HUMAN; THINKING;

CONCEPT FORMATION; DECISION MAKING; EMOTIONS; GAMES, EXPERIMENTAL; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; THINKING;

EID: 78751470159     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0021523     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Alicke M.D., Buckingham J., Zell E., Davis T. Culpable control and counterfactual reasoning in the psychology of blame. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2008, 34:1371-1381. doi: 10.1177/0146167208321594.
2. Barker S. Even, still and counterfactuals. Linguistics and Philosophy 1991, 14:1-38. doi: 10.1007/BF00628303.
3. Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 51:1173-1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
4. Branscombe N.R., Owen S., Garstka T.A., Coleman J. Rape and accident counterfactuals: Who might have done otherwise and would it have changed the outcome?. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1996, 26:1042-1067. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01124.x.
5. Branscombe N.R., Wohl M.J.A., Owen S., Alison J.A., N'gbala A. Counterfactual thinking, blame assignment, and well-being in rape victims. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 2003, 25:265-273. doi: 10.1207/S15324834BASP2504_1.
6. Briñol P., Petty R.E. Persuasion: Insights from the self-validation hypothesis. Advances in experimental social psychology 2009, 41:69-118. Elsevier, New York, NY. M.P. Zanna (Ed.).
7. Byrne R.M.J. Mental models and counterfactual thoughts about what might have been. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002, 6:426-431. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01974-5.
8. Byrne R.M.J., McEleney A. Counterfactual thinking about actions and failures to act. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2000, 26:1318-1331. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1318.
9. Cohen J., Cohen P., West S.G., Aiken L.S. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences 2003, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. 3rd ed.
10. Epstude K., Roese N.J. The functional theory of counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2008, 12:168-192. doi: 10.1177/1088868308316091.
11. Girotto V., Legrenzi P., Rizzo A. Event controllability in counterfactual thinking. Acta Psychologica 1991, 78:111-133. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(91)90007-M.
12. Gleicher F., Kost K.A., Baker S.M., Strathman A.J., Richman S.A., Sherman S.J. The role of counterfactual thinking in judgments of affect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1990, 16:284-295. doi: 10.1177/0146167290162009.
13. Goldinger S.D., Kleider H.M., Azuma T., Beike D. " Blaming the victim" under memory load. Psychological Science 2003, 14:81-85. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.01423.
14. Goodman N. Fact, fiction and forecast 1973, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
15. Green D.W., Applebaum R., Tong S. Mental simulation and argument. Thinking and Reasoning 2006, 12:31-61. doi: 10.1080/13546780500145686.
16. Hart H.L.A., Honoré T. Causation in the law 1985, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
17. Hilton D.J. Logic and causal attribution. Contemporary science and natural explanation 1988, 33-65. New York University Press, New York, NY. D.J. Hilton (Ed.).
18. Hofstadter D.R. Gödel, Escher, Bach: An eternal golden braid 1979, Vintage Books, New York, NY.
19. Jarvis W.B.G. MediaLab v2006 [Computer software] 2006, Empirisoft, New York, NY.
20. Johnson J.T. The knowledge of what might have been: Affective and attributional consequences of near outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1986, 12:51-62. doi: 10.1177/0146167286121006.
21. Kahneman D., Miller D.T. Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review 1986, 93:136-153. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.136.
22. Kahneman D., Tversky A. The simulation heuristic. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases 1982, 201-210. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, A. Tversky (Eds.).
23. Kunda Z. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 1990, 108:480-498. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480.
24. Landman J. Regret and elation following action and inaction: Affective responses to positive versus negative outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1987, 13:524-536. doi: 10.1177/0146167287134009.
25. Langer E.J. The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975, 32:311-328. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.311.
26. Mandel D.R. Judgment dissociation theory: An analysis of differences in causal, counterfactual, and covariational reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2003, 132:419-434. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.3.419.
27. Mandel D.R., Dhami M.K. " What I did" versus " what I might have done": Effect of factual versus counterfactual thinking on blame, guilt, and shame in prisoners. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2005, 41:627-635. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.08.009.
28. Mandel D.R., Hilton D.J., Catellani P. The psychology of counterfactual thinking 2005, Routledge, New York, NY.
29. Markman K.D., Gavanski I., Sherman S.J., McMullen M.N. The mental simulation of better and worse possible worlds. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1993, 29:87-109. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1993.1005.
30. McCloy R., Byrne R.M.J. Counterfactual thinking about controllable actions. Memory & Cognition 2000, 28:1071-1078.
31. McCloy R., Byrne R.M.J. Semifactual " even if" thinking. Thinking and Reasoning 2002, 8:41-67. doi: 10.1080/13546780143000125.
32. McEleney A., Byrne R.M.J. Spontaneous causal and counterfactual thoughts. Thinking and Reasoning 2006, 12:235-255. doi: 10.1080/13546780500317897.
33. McGuire W.J. Personality and attitude change: An information processing theory. Psychological foundations of attitudes 1968, 171-196. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. A.G. Greenwald, T.C. Brock, T.M. Ostrom (Eds.).
34. McRoberts S. Seeking belated welcome: Local man campaigns for a day to honor Vietnam veterans. Whittier Daily News 2003, January 25, Retrieved from http://www.whvvd.org/whvvdwebsite/web%20newspaper%20articles/Whitter%20Daily%20News%201-25-03.
35. Medvec V.H., Madey S.F., Gilovich T. When less is more: Counterfactual thinking and satisfaction among Olympic medalists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1995, 69:603-610. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.603.
36. Miller D.T., Gunasegaram S. Temporal order and the perceived mutability of events: Implications for blame assignment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1990, 59:1111-1118. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1111.
37. Miller D.T., Taylor B.R. Counterfactual thought, regret, and superstition: How to avoid kicking yourself. What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking 1995, 305-331. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. N.J. Roese, J.M. Olson (Eds.).
38. Miller D.T., Turnbull W. The counterfactual fallacy: Confusing what might have been with what ought to have been. Social Justice Research 1990, 4:1-19. doi: 10.1007/BF01048532.
39. Molden D.C., Higgins E.T. How preferences for eager versus vigilant judgment strategies affect self-serving outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2008, 44:1219-1228. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.009.
40. Petrocelli J.V., Sherman S.J. Event detail and confidence in gambling: The role of counterfactual thought reactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2010, 46:61-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.09.013.
41. Petrocelli J.V., Tormala Z.L., Rucker D.D. Unpacking attitude certainty: Attitude clarity and attitude correctness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007, 92:30-41. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.30.
42. Petty R.E., Briñol P., Tormala Z.L. Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: The self-validation hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 82:722-741. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.722.
43. Petty R.E., Briñol P., Tormala Z.L., Wegener D.T. The role of metacognition in social judgment. Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles 2007, 254-284. Guilford Press, New York, NY. 2nd ed. A.W. Kruglanski, E.T. Higgins (Eds.).
44. Reder L.M., Schunn C.D. Metacognition does not imply awareness: Strategy choice is governed by implicit learning and memory. Implicit memory and metacognition 1996, 45-77. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. L.M. Reder (Ed.).
45. Rescher N. Paradoxes: Their roots, range, and resolution 2001, Open Court Press, Chicago, IL.
46. Roese N.J. Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin 1997, 121:133-148. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.133.
47. Roese N.J., Olson J.M. Counterfactual thinking: A critical overview. What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking 1995, 1-55. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. N.J. Roese, J.M. Olson (Eds.).
48. Roese N.J., Olson J.M. What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking 1995, 1-55. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
49. Roese N.J., Olson J.M. Counterfactual thinking: The intersection of affect and function. Advances in experimental social psychology 1997, 29:1-59. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. M.P. Zanna (Ed.).
50. Roese N.J., Sanna L.J., Galinsky A.D. The mechanics of imagination: Automaticity and control in counterfactual thinking. The new unconscious 2005, 138-170. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. R.R. Hassin, J.S. Uleman, J.A. Bargh (Eds.).
51. Sanna L.J., Turley K.J. Antecedents to spontaneous counterfactual thinking: Effects of expectancy violation and outcome valence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1996, 22:906-919. doi: 10.1177/0146167296229005.
52. Schwarz N., Bless H., Strack F., Klumpp G., Rittenaur-Schatka H., Simmons A. Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1991, 61:195-202. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.195.
53. Schwarz N., Sanna L.J., Skurnik I., Yoon C. Metacognitive experiences and the intricacies of setting people straight: Implications for debiasing and public information campaigns. Advances in experimental social psychology 2007, 39:127-161. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. M.P. Zanna (Ed.).
54. Schwarz N., Vaughn L.A. The availability heuristic revisited: Ease of recall and content of recall as distinct sources of information. Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment 2002, 103-119. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, D. Kahneman (Eds.).
55. Seelau E.P., Seelau S.M., Wells G.L., Windschitl P.D. Counterfactual constraints. What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking 1995, 57-79. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. N.J. Roese, J.M. Olson (Eds.).
56. Seta C.E., Seta J.J., McElroy G.T., Hatz J. Regret: The roles of consistency-fit and counterfactual salience. Social Cognition 2008, 26:700-719. doi: 10.1521/soco.2008.26.6.700.
57. Spellman B.A. Crediting causality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1997, 126:323-348. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.126.4.323.
58. Spellman B.A., Kincannon A.P., Stose S.J. The relation between counterfactual and causal reasoning. The psychology of counterfactual thinking 2005, 28-43. Routledge, New York, NY. D.R. Mandel, D.J. Hilton, P. Catellani (Eds.).
59. Spencer S.J., Zanna M.P., Fong G.T. Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2005, 89:845-851. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845.
60. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology 1973, 5:207-232. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9.
61. Walsh C.R., Byrne R.M.J. Counterfactual thinking: The temporal order effect. Memory & Cognition 2004, 32:369-378.
62. Wells G.L., Gavanski I. Mental simulation of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1989, 56:161-169. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.161.