Applying the STIRPAT model in a post-Fordist landscape: Can a traditional econometric model work at the local level?

Applied Geography

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 731-739

  Roberts, Tyler D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecological economics; Population; Spatial econometrics; STIRPAT; US southeast

Indexed keywords

CARBON EMISSION; ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; ECONOMETRICS; MODEL TEST; MODEL VALIDATION; POST-FORDISM; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; STOCHASTICITY; STRUCTURAL CHANGE; THEORETICAL STUDY;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 78651596428     PISSN: 01436228     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.06.010     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Agrawal A. Environmentality: Technologies of government and the making of subjects 2005, Duke University Press, Durham/London.
2. Ambinakudige S. Revisiting " the South" and " Dixie": delineating vernacular regions using GIS. Southeastern Geographer 2009, 49(3):240-250.
3. Anselin L. A test for spatial autocorrelation in seemingly unrelated regressions. Economics Letters 1988, 28(4):335-341.
4. Anselin L., Bera A., Florax R., Yoon M. Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Regional Science and Urban Economics 1996, 26(1):77-104.
5. Anselin L., Moreno R. Properties of tests for spatial error components. Regional Science and Urban Economics 2003, 33(5):595-618.
6. Beck U. Risk society 1992, Sage, London.
7. Bolin B., Matranga E., Hackett E., Sadalla E., Pijawka K., Brewer D., et al. Environmental equity in a sunbelt city: the spatial distribution of toxic hazards in Phoenix, Arizona. Environmental Hazards 2000, 2(1):11-24.
8. Bolin B., Nelson A., Hackett E., Pijawka K., Smith C., Sicotte D., et al. The ecology of technological risk in a sunbelt city. Environment and Planning A 2002, 34(2):317-339.
9. Chertow M. The IPAT equation and its variants: changing views of technology and environmental impact. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2001, 4(4):13-29.
10. Clark G. The employment relation and the spatial division of labor. Annals of Regional Science 1981, 71(3):412-424.
11. Clark G. The changing composition of regional employment. Economic Geography 1984, 60(2):175-193.
12. Cole L., Foster S. From the ground up 2001, New York University Press, New York.
13. Cole M., Neumayer E. Examining the impact of demographic factors on air pollution. Population and Environment 2004, 26(1):5-21.
14. Commoner B. The environmental cost of economic growth. Population, resources and the environment 1972, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 339-63.
15. Cramer J. Population growth and air quality in California. Demography 1998, 35(1):45-56.
16. Cramer J., Cheney R. Lost in the ozone: population growth and ozone in California. Population and Environment 2000, 21(3):315-338.
17. Cronon W. Nature's metropolis 1991, W.W. Norton, New York/London.
18. DeHart J., Soulé P. Does I=PAT work in local places?. Professional Geographer 2000, 52(1):1-10.
19. Dietz T., Rosa E. Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Human Ecology Review 1994, 1:277-300.
20. 2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1997, 94(1):175-179.
21. Ehrhardt-Martinez K., Crenshaw E., Jenkins J. Deforestation and the environmental Kuznets curve: a cross-national investigation of intervening mechanisms. Social Science Quarterly 2002, 83(1):226-243.
22. Ehrlich P., Ehrlich A. The population explosion 1990, Simon and Schuster, New York.
23. Ehrlich P., Holdren J. Impact of population growth. Science 1971, 171(3977):1212-1217.
24. Elden S. Governmentality, calculation, territory. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 2007, 25(3):562-580.
25. Ellis M., Wright R., Parks V. Geography and the immigrant division of labor. Economic Geography 2007, 83(3):225-281.
26. England K. Suburban pink collar ghettos: the spatial entrapment of women?. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 1993, 83(2):225-242.
27. England K. Disabilities, gender and employment: social exclusion, employment equity and Canadian banking. Canadian Geographer 2003, 47(4):429-450.
28. 2 emissions using the STIRPAT model. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2006, 26(4):377-395.
29. Fischer-Kowalski M., Amman C. Beyond IPAT and Kuznets curves: globalization as a vital factor in analysing environmental impact of socio-economic metabolism. Population and Environment 2001, 23(1):7-47.
30. Frey S. The export of hazardous industries to the peripheral zones of the world-system. Journal of Developing Societies 1998, 14:66-81.
31. Gujarati D. Basic econometrics 2002, McGraw Hill, Boston.
32. 2 emission fluxes for the united states. Environmental Science and Technology 2009, 43(14):5535-5541.
33. Harte J. Human population as a dynamic factor in environmental degradation. Population and Environment 2007, 28(4-5):223-236.
34. Harvey D. Justice, nature, and the geography of difference 1996, Oxford, Blackwell.
35. Irwin A. Citizen science 1995, Routledge, London.
36. Jürgen E. The geography of job creation and destruction in the U.S. manufacturing sector, 1967-1997. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2004, 94(3):602.
37. Keys E., McConnell W. Global change and the intensification of agriculture in the tropics. Global Environmental Change 2005, 15(4):320-337.
38. Kipnis A. Audit cultures: neoliberal governmentality, socialist legacy, or technologies of governing?. American Ethnologist 2008, 35(2):275-289.
39. 2 emissions. Energy Policy 1996, 24(1):31-37.
40. Kuznets S. Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review 1955, 45(1):1-28.
41. 2 emissions: evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests. Energy Policy 2008, 37(2):413-423.
42. Malecki E. Industrial location and corporate organization in high technology industries. Economic Geography 1985, 61(4):345-369.
43. Miller P., Rose N. Governing the present 2008, Polity, Cambridge.
44. 2 emissions. Environment and Development Economics 1997, 2(4):451-463.
45. Ó hUallacháin B. Regional and technological implications of the recent buildup in American defense spending. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 1987, 77(2):208-223.
46. Ó hUallacháin B., Leslie T. Spatial convergence and spillovers in American invention. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2005, 95(4):866-886.
47. Ó hUallacháin B., Reid N. The location and growth of business and professional services in American metropolitan areas, 1976-1986. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 1991, 81(2):254-270.
48. Openshaw S. The modifiable areal unit problem 1984, Geo Books, Norwich, UK.
49. Panayotou T. Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve: turning a black box into a policy tool. Environment and Development Economics 1997, 2(4):465-484.
50. Peet R., Watts M. Liberation ecologies 2004, Blackwell, London.
51. Perz S. Reformulating modernization-based environmental social theories: challenges on the road to an interdisciplinary environmental science. Society and Natural Resources 2004, 20(5):415-430.
52. Power M. Organized uncertainty: Designing a world of risk management 2007, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
53. Raskin P. Methods for estimating the population contribution to environmental change. Ecological Economics 1995, 15(3):225-233.
54. Richmond A., Kaufmann R. Is there a turning point in the relationship between income and energy use and/or carbon emissions?. Ecological Economics 2006, 56(2):176-189.
55. Scholz S. The POETICS of industrial carbon dioxide emissions in Japan: an urban and institutional extension of the IPAT identity. Carbon Balance and Management 2006, 1(11). 10.1186/1750-0680-1-11.
56. Scott A. Regional motors of the global economy. Futures 1996, 28(5):391-411.
57. Soja E. Los Angeles, 1965-1992: from crisis-generated restructuring to restructuring generated crisis. The city: Los Angeles and urban theory at the end of the twentieth century 1996, University of California Press, Berkeley/Los Angeles. A.J. Scott, E.W. Soja (Eds.).
58. Soulé P., DeHart J. Assessing IPAT using production- and consumption-based measures of I. Social Science Quarterly 1998, 79(4):754-765.
59. Stern D. The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development 2004, 22(8):1419-1439.
60. Stern D., Common M., Barbrier E. Economic growth and environmental degradation: the environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development. World Development 1996, 24(7):1151-1160.
61. Turner B., Kasperson R., Meyer W., Dow K., Golding D., Kasperson J., et al. Two types of global environmental change. Global Environmental Change 1990, 1(1):14-22.
62. Vincent J. Testing for environmental Kuznets curves within a developing country. Environment and Development Economics 1997, 2(4):417-431.
63. Vitousek P. Beyond global warming: ecology and global change. Ecology 1994, 75(7):1861-1876.
64. Walker R. Putting capital in its place: globalization and the prospects for labor. Geoforum 1999, 30(3):263-284.
65. Walker R., Ellis M., Barff R. Linked migration systems: immigration and internal labor flows in the United States. Economic Geography 1992, 68(3):234-248.
66. White H. A heteroscedasticity consistent covariance matrix and a direct test for heteroscedasticity. Econometrica 1980, 48(4):817-838.
67. York R., Rosa E., Dietz T. Footprints on the earth: the environmental consequences of modernity. American Sociological Review 2003, 68(2):279-300.
68. York R., Rosa E., Dietz T. A rift in modernity? Assessing the anthropogenic sources of global climate change with the STIRPAT model. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 2003, 23(10):31-51.
69. York R., Rosa E., Dietz T. STIRPAT, IPAT, and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecological Economics 2003, 46(3):351-365.
70. Zagheni E., Billari F. A cost valuation model based on a stochastic representation of the IPAT equation. Population and Environment 2007, 29(2):68-82.