Risk analysis of bulk carriers

Ships and Offshore Structures

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 199-209

  Psarros, George Ad ^a   Vassalos, Dracos ^b  

^a DNV GL   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bayesian network; Bulk carrier; Operational profile; Response surface; Risk analysis

Indexed keywords

AS LOW AS REASONABLY PRACTICABLE; BAYESIAN; BULK CARRIER; CENTRAL COMPOSITE DESIGNS; DEVELOPED MODEL; NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES; OPERATIONAL DOMAINS; OPERATIONAL PROFILE; OPERATIONAL RISKS; RESPONSE SURFACE;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; DISTRIBUTED PARAMETER NETWORKS; FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION; INFERENCE ENGINES; INTELLIGENT NETWORKS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

RISK ANALYSIS;

EID: 78651591576     PISSN: 17445302     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17445300903354232     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. ATSB. 1988, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993. Singa Sea, Alexandre-P, Starfish, Mineral Diamond, Manila Transporter, Melete, Daeyang Honey accidents. Maritime safety investigation reports.
2. Aven T. 2003. Foundations of risk analysis-A knowledge and decision oriented perspective. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
3. BEAmer. 2004. Report on the investigation of the total loss of the bulk carrier "Adamandas" on 22nd September 2003 off the Island of La Reunion following the re-oxidation of a cargo of direct reduced iron. Paris, France.
4. Bearfield G, Marsh W. 2005. Generalising event trees usingbayesian networks with a case study of train derailment. Lect Notes Comput Sci. 3688:52-66.
5. Bedford T, Cooke R. 2004. Probabilistic risk analysis: foundations andmethods. 3rd Printing. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
6. Bobbio A, Portinale L, Minichino M, Ciancamerla E. 2001. Improving the analysis of dependable systems by mapping fault trees into Bayesian networks. Reliability Eng Sys Saf. 71(3):249-260.
7. BOMEL Limited. 2002. Development and quantification of influence networks. Final. Maidenhead, Berkshire (UK). Report No.: C999\06\047R-Rev.C.
8. Cox LA, Jr. 2002. Risk analysis: foundations models andmethods. Boston (MA): Kluwer Academic Publishers.
9. Denmark and Norway. 2006. Any other business-FSA study on ECDIS/ENCs. London: IMO MSC 81/24/5.
10. DFT. 2005. M/V Derbyshire. [Internet; cited 2007 Aug 24].Available from: http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/shippingports/shipping/safety/mvderbyshire/
11. Dhillon BS. 2007. Applied reliability and quality-fundamentals, methods and procedures. London (UK): Springer-Verlag Ltd.
12. Douglas M, Wildavsky A. 1983. Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.
13. Eleye-Datubo AG, Wall A, Saajedi A, Wang J. 2006. Enabling a powerful marine and offshore decision-support solution through Bayesian network technique. Risk Anal. 26(3):695-721.
14. Evans M, Hastings N, Peacock B. 2000. Statistical distributions. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
15. Friis-Hansen A. 2000. Bayesian networks as a decision support tool in marine applications [PhD thesis]. [Lyngby (Denmark)]: Technical University of Denmark.
16. Gardiner CP, Melchers RE. 2003. Corrosion analysis of bulk carriers, Part I: operational parameters influencing corrosion rates. Mar Struct. 16(8):547-566.
17. Guarin L, Drennan T. 2005. Traffic routeing in the Minches and West of Hebrides. Glasgow (UK): Safety at Sea Ltd. Report No.: CEMT01-REP-001-LG.
18. Guarin L, Vassalos D. 2004. Comparative study of single and double side skin bulk carriers. Glasgow (UK): Safety at Sea Ltd. Report No.: BC01-RE-001-LG.
19. Hogben N, Dacunha NMC, Olliver GF. 1986. Global wave statistics. Middlesex (UK): BMT Ltd.
20. Hooke N. 1997. Maritime casualties 1963-1996. 2nd ed. London: LLP Limited.
21. HORSCTCI. 1992. Ships of shame: an inquiry into ship safety. Canberra (Australia). Australian Government Publishing Service.
22. HSE. 2001. Reducing risks, protecting people: HSE's decisionmaking process. Norwich (UK): HMSO.
23. HSE. 2002. Marine risk assessment. London: Offshore Technology Report 2001/063.
24. Hugin Expert A/S. 2006. Hugin version 6.7. Aalborg (Denmark).
25. IMO. 2004. Casualty analyses considered and approved by the sub-committee on Flag State Implementation at its twelfth session in 2004. London: IMO FSI 12.
26. IMO. 2005. Load lines: international convention on load lines, 1966 and protocol of 1988, as amended in 2003-consolidated edition, 2005. 3rd ed. London.
27. IMO. 2007. Formal safety assessment-consolidated text of the guidelines for formal safety assessments (FSA) for use in the IMO rule-making process (MSC/Circ.1023-MEPC/Circ.392). London: MSC 83/INF.2.
28. Intercargo. 1998, 1999. Bulk carrier casualty reports. London.
29. ISSC. 2006. Specialist Committee V.6.: condition assessment of aged ships. Southampton (UK): Report of the 16th International Ship Structures Congress. University of Southampton Press.
30. Japan. 2002. FSA study on bulk carrier safety, Annex 5: risk analysis. London: IMO MSC 75/5.
31. Jensen FV. 1996. An introduction to Bayesian networks. London: UCL Press Ltd.
32. th ed. McGraw-Hill Singapore International Edition. p. 2.1-2.18.
33. Koller D, Pfeffer A. 1997. Object-oriented Bayesian networks. Paper presented at: UIA-97. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence; Providence (RI), USA. Morgan Kaufman Publishers: San Francisco, CA, USA.
34. Kumamoto H, Henley EJ. 1996. Probabilistic risk assessment and management for engineers and scientists. 2nd ed. New Jersey (USA): IEEE Press.
35. LMIU. January 1999-May 2005. Bulk carrier casualty database. May 2005 version. London: LMIU.
36. Modarres M. 2006. Risk analysis in engineering-techniques, tools and trends. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press-Taylor & Francis Group.
37. th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
38. Morone JG, Woodhouse EJ. 1988. Averting catastrophe: strategies for regulating risky technologies. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.
39. Neapolitan RE. 2004. Learning Bayesian networks. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson Prentice Hall.
40. Norway. 2005. Passenger ship safety: effective voyage planning for passenger ships, FSA-large passenger ships-navigational safety. London: IMO NAV 51/10.
41. NTSB. 1978. SS Edmund Fitzgerald sinking. Report No.: NTSBMAR-78-3.
42. NTSB. 1984. Marine electric capsizing and sinking. Report No.: NTSB/MAR-84/01.
43. OECD. 2001. The cost to users of substandard shipping. Paris.
44. Pearl J. 1988. Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. SanMateo (CA):Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
45. Rawson KJ, Tupper EC. 2001. Basic ship theory. 5th ed. Oxford (UK): Butterworth-Heinemann.
46. Roland HE, Moriarty M. 1990. System safety engineering and management. Toronto (Canada): John Wiley & Sons Inc.
47. Rowe WD. 1988. An anatomy of risk. Reprint edition. Malabar (FL): Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company Inc.
48. Seignette R. 2002. Detailed task inventory. Global maritime B.V. Report No.: GM-R0342-0108-1400.
49. Skjong R, Vanem E, Endresen O. 2007. Risk evaluation criteria. 3rd rev. SAFEDOR-D-4.5.2-2007-10-24-DNV-rev-3.0.
50. Stopford M. 2009. Maritime economics. 3rd ed. London (UK): Routledge.
51. TSB. 2000. Marine investigation report: break-up and sinking, the bulk carrier "FLARE". Quebec (Canada). Report No.: M98N0001.
52. UK. 2002. Bulk carrier safety: international collaborative FSA study-final report. London: IMO MSC 76/5/5.
53. Van Roon T. 2001. High level task inventory. Global Maritime B.V. Report No.: GM-R0315-001101383. Rotterdam.
54. Vinnem JE. 2007. Offshore risk assessment: principles, modeling and applications of QRA studies. 2nd ed. London (UK): Springer-Verlag Ltd.
55. Vose D. 2001. Risk analysis, a quantitative guide. 2nd ed. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
56. Wang J, Trbojevic V. 2007. Design for safety of marine and offshore systems. London (UK): IMarEST.