Higher order positive semidefinite diffusion tensor imaging

SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 416-433

  Qi, Liqun ^a   Yu, Gaohang ^a,b   Wu, Ed X ^c  

^a HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

^b GANNAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Apparent diffusion coefficient; Convex optimization problem; Invariants; Positive semidefinite diffusion tensor; Z eigenvalue

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION; CONVEX OPTIMIZATION; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SURFACE DIFFUSION; TENSORS;

APPARENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; CONVEX OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; DIFFUSION TENSOR; INVARIANTS; Z-EIGENVALUE;

DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING;

EID: 78651578983     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19364954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1137/090755138     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. D. C. Alexander, G. J. Barker, and S. R. Arridge, Detection and modeling of non-Gaussianapparent diffusion coefficient profiles in human brain data, Magn. Reson. Med., 48 (2002), pp. 331-340.
2. V. Arsigny, P. Fillard, X. Pennec, and N. Ayache, Log-Euclidean metrics for fast and simplecalculus on diffusion tensors, Magn. Reson. Med., 56 (2006), pp. 411-421.
3. A. Barmpoutis, M. S. Hwang, D. Howland, J. R. Forder, and B. C. Vemuri, Regularized positivedefinitefourth order tensor field estimation from DW-MRI, Neuroimage, 45 (2009), pp. S153-S162.
4. A. Barmpoutis, B. Jian, B. C. Vemuri, and T. M. Shepherd, Symmetric positive 4th order tensors& their estimation from diffusion weighted MRI, in Information Processing in Medical Imaging, M.Karssemeijer and B. Lelieveldt, eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007, pp. 308-319.
5. P. J. Basser and D. K. Jones, Diffusion-tensor MRI: Theory, experimental design and data analysis -a technical review, NMR Biomed., 15 (2002), pp. 456-467.
6. P. J. Basser, J. Mattiello, and D. LeBihan, Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor fromthe NMR spin echo, J. Magn. Reson. B, 103 (1994), pp. 247-254.
7. P. J. Basser, J. Mattiello, and D. LeBihan, MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging, Biophys.J., 66 (1994), pp. 259-267.
8. L. Bloy and R. Verma, On computing the underlying fiber directions from the diffusion orientationdistribution function, in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention-MICCAI2008, Part I, Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. 5241, D. Metaxas, L. Axel, G. Fichtinger, and G. Székeley,eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008, pp. 1-8.
9. C. Chefd'Hotel, D. Tschumperle, R. Deriche, and O. Faugeras, Regularizing flows for constrainedmatrix-valued images, J. Math. Imaging Vision, 20 (2004), pp. 147-162.
10. D. Cox, J. Little, and D. O'Shea, Using Algebraic Geometry, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998.
11. M. Descoteaux, E. Angelino, S. Fitzgibbons, and R. Deriche, Apparent diffusion coefficientsfrom high angular diffusion imaging: Estimation and applications, Magn. Reson. Med., 56 (2006),pp. 395-410.
12. M. Descoteaux, E. Angelino, S. Fitzgibbons, and R. Deriche, Regularized, fast, and analyticalq-ball imaging, Magn. Reson. Med., 58 (2007), pp. 497-510.
13. M. Descoteaux, N. Wiest-Daesslé, S. Prima, C. Barillot, and R. Deriche, Impact of Ricianadapted non-local means filtering on HARDI, in Medical Imaging and Computer-AssistedIntervention-MICCAI 2008, Part II, Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. 5242, Springer-Verlag, Berlin,Heidelberg, 2008, pp. 122-130.
14. L. R. Frank, Characterization of anisotropy in high angular resolution diffusion weighted MRI, Magn.Reson. Med., 47 (2002), pp. 1083-1099.
15. A. Ghosh, M. Descoteaux, and R. Deriche, Riemannian framework for estimating symmetricpositive definite 4th order diffusion tensors, in Medical Image Computing and Computer-AssistedIntervention-MICCAI 2008, Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. 5241, D. Metaxas, L. Axel, G. Fichtinger,and G. Székeley, eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008, pp. 858-865.
16. J. L. Goffin and J. P. Vial, Convex nondifferentiable optimization: A survey focused on the analyticalcenter cutting plane method, Optim. Methods Softw., 17 (2002), pp. 805-867.
17. J.-B. Hiriart-Urruty and C. Lemaréchal, Convex Analysis and Minimization Algorithms, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993.
18. B. Jian, B. C. Vemuri, E. Ozarslan, P. R. Carney, and T. H. Mareci, A novel tensor distributionmodel for the diffusion-weighted MR signal, Neuroimage, 37 (2007), pp. 164-176.
19. C. Lenglet, J. Campbell, M. Descoteaux, G. Haro, P. Savadjiev, D. Wassermann, A. Anwander,R. Deriche, G. Pike, G. Sapiro, K. Siddiqi, and P. Thompson, Mathematical methods fordiffusion MRI processing, Neuroimage, 45 (2009), pp. 111-122.
20. C. Lenglet, M. Rousson, R. Deriche, and O. Faugeras, Statistics on the manifold of multivariatenormal distributions: Theory and application to diffusion tensor MRI processing, J. Math. ImagingVision, 25 (2006), pp. 423-444.
21. G. Ni, L. Qi, F. Wang, and Y. Wang, The degree of the E-characteristic polynomial of an even ordertensor, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 329 (2007), pp. 1218-1229.
22. J. Nocedal and S. J. Wright, Numerical Optimization, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999.
23. E. ̈Ozarslan and T. H. Mareci, Generalized diffusion tensor imaging and analytical relationshipsbetween diffusion tensor imaging and high angular resolution diffusion imaging, Magn. Reson. Med.,50 (2003), pp. 955-965.
24. E. ̈Ozarslan, B. C. Vemuri, and T. H. Mareci, Generalized scalar measures for diffusion MRI usingtrace, variance, and entropy, Magn. Reson. Med., 53 (2005), pp. 866-876.
25. X. Pennec, P. Fillard, and N. Ayache, A Riemannian framework for tensor computing, Int. J.Comput. Vision, 66 (2006), pp. 41-66.
26. L. Qi, Eigenvalues of a real supersymmetric tensor, J. Symbolic Comput., 40 (2005), pp. 1302-1324.
27. L. Qi, Eigenvalues and invariants of tensors, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 325 (2007), pp. 1363-1377.
28. L. Qi, D. Han, and E. X. Wu, Principal invariants and inherent parameters of diffusion kurtosis tensors,J. Math. Anal. Appl., 349 (2009), pp. 165-180.
29. L. Qi, F. Wang, and Y. Wang, Z-eigenvalue methods for a global polynomial optimization problem,Math. Program., 118 (2009), pp. 301-316.
30. L. Qi, Y. Wang, and E. X. Wu, D-eigenvalues of diffusion kurtosis tensors, J. Comput. Appl. Math.,221 (2008), pp. 150-157.
31. R. T. Rockafellar, Convex Analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1970.
32. K. Seunarine, P. Cook, M. Hall, K. Embleton, G. Parker, and D. Alexander, Exploiting peakanisotropy for tracking through complex structures, in Proceedings of the IEEE 11th International Conferenceon Computer Vision (ICCV 2007), IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 2007, pp. 1-8.
33. D. S. Tuch, Q-ball imaging, Magn. Reson. Med., 52 (2004), pp. 1358-1372.
34. D. S. Tuch, T. G. Reese, M. R. Wiegell, N. G. Makris, J. W. Belliveau, and V. J. Wedeen,High angular resolution diffusion imaging reveals intravoxel white matter fiber heterogeneity, Magn.Reson. Med., 48 (2002), pp. 454-459.
35. Z. Wang, B. C. Vemuri, Y. Chen, and T. H. Mareci, A constrained variational principle fordirect estimation and smoothing of the diffusion tensor field from complex DWI, IEEE Trans. Med.Imaging, 23 (2004), pp. 930-939.
36. N. Wiest-Daesslé, S. Prima, P. Coupé, S. P. Morrissey, and C. Barillot, Rician noise removalby non-local means filtering for low signal-to-noise ratio MRI: Application to DT-MRI, in Medical Imaging and Computer-Assisted Intervention-MICCAI 2008, Part II, Lecture Notes in Comput.Sci. 5242, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008, pp. 171-179.