A critical study of the Miura-Maki integral method for the estimation of the kinetic parameters of the distributed activation energy model

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 102, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 3894-3899

  Cai, Junmeng ^a   Li, Tao ^a   Liu, Ronghou ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Activation energy distribution; Biomass; Frequency factor; Nonisothermal kinetics; Pyrolysis

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATION ENERGY DISTRIBUTION; B VALUE; DISTRIBUTED ACTIVATION ENERGY MODEL; FREQUENCY FACTORS; INTEGRAL METHOD; MEAN VALUES; NON-ISOTHERMAL KINETIC; SIMULATED DATA; STANDARD DEVIATION;

ELECTRIC POWER DISTRIBUTION; ION BEAMS; KINETIC PARAMETERS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PYROLYSIS;

ACTIVATION ENERGY;

ACTIVATION ENERGY; BIOMASS; ERROR ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION METHOD; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PYROLYSIS; REACTION KINETICS; THEORETICAL STUDY;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; ENERGY; KINETICS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ALGORITHMS; BIOMASS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; KINETICS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 78651515145     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.110     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aboulkas A., Elharfi K., Elbouadili A. Kinetic and mechanism of Tarfaya (Morocco) oil shale and LDPE mixture pyrolysis. J. Mater. Process Technol. 2008, 206:16-24.
2. Burnham A.K., Braun R.L. Global kinetic analysis of complex materials. Energy Fuels 1999, 13:1-12.
3. Burnham A.K., Weese R.K., Weeks B.L. A distributed activation energy model of thermodynamically inhibited nucleation and growth reactions and its application to the β-δ phase transition of HMX. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108:19432-19441.
4. Cai, J., Jin, C., Yang, S., Chen, Y., 2010a. Logistic distributed activation energy model - part 1: derivation and numerical parametric study. Bioresour. Technol. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.079.
5. Cai J.M., Liu R.H. Parametric study of the nonisothermal nth-order distributed activation energy model involved the Weibull distribution for biomass pyrolysis. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2007, 89:971-975.
6. Cai J., Ji L. Pattern search method for determination of DAEM kinetic parameters from nonisothermal TGA data of biomass. J. Math. Chem. 2007, 42:547-553.
7. Cai J., Liu R. Weibull mixture model for modeling nonisothermal kinetics of thermally stimulated solid-state reactions: application to simulated and real kinetic conversion data. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111:10681-10686.
8. Cai J., Liu R. New distributed activation energy model: numerical solution and application to pyrolysis kinetics of some types of biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:2795-2799.
9. Cai J., Liu R. Numerical analysis of new distributed activation energy model for representation of biomass pyrolysis kinetics. J. Energy Inst. 2008, 81(3):149-152.
10. Cai, J., Yang, S., Li, T., 2010b. Logistic distributed activation energy model - part 2: application to cellulose pyrolysis. Bioresour. Technol. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.073.
11. Dawood A., Miura K. Pyrolysis kinetics of γ-irradiated polypropylene. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2001, 73:347-354.
12. Ding L.P., Yuan Y.X., Farooq S., Bhatia S.K. A heterogeneous model for gas transport in carbon molecular sieves. Langmuir 2005, 21:674-681.
13. Fischer P.E., Jou C.S., Gokalgandhi S.S. Obtaining the kinetic parameters from thermogravimetry using a modified Coats and Redfern technique. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1987, 26(5):1037-1040.
14. Güneş M., Güneş S.K. A direct search method for determination of DAEM kinetic parameters from nonisothermal TGA data (note). Appl. Math. Comput. 2002, 130:619-628.
15. Güneş M., Güneş S.K. A study on thermal decomposition kinetics of some Turkish coals. Energy Sources Part A-Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 2005, 27:749-759.
16. Güneş M., Güneş S.K. Distributed activation energy model parameters of some Turkish coals. Energy Sources Part A-Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 2008, 30:1460-1472.
17. Jankovic B. Identification of the effective distribution function for determination of the distributed activation energy models using the maximum likelihood method: isothermal thermogravimetric data. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 2009, 41:27-44.
18. Koga N., Criado J., Tanaka H. Kinetic analysis of the thermal decomposition of synthetic malachite by CRTA. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2000, 60:943-954.
19. Lakshmanan C.C., White N. A new distributed activation energy model using Weibull distribution for the representation of complex kinetics. Energy Fuels 1994, 8:1158-1167.
20. Li Z., Liu C., Chen Z., Qian J., Zhao W., Zhu Q. Analysis coals and biomass pyrolysis using the distributed activation energy model. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:948-952.
21. Liu X., Li B., Miura K. Analysis of pyrolysis and gasification reactions of hydrothermally and supercritically upgraded low-rank coal by using a new distributed activation energy model. Fuel Process Technol. 2001, 69:1-12.
22. Mani T., Murugan P., Mahinpey N. Determination of distributed activation energy model kinetic parameters using annealing optimization method for nonisothermal pyrolysis of lignin. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48:1464-1467.
23. 0(E) in the distributed activation energy model from three sets of experimental data. Energy Fuels 1995, 9:302-307.
24. Miura K., Mae K., Shimada M., Minami H. Analysis of formation rates of sulfur-containing gases during the pyrolysis of various coals. Energy Fuels 2001, 15:629-636.
25. 0(E) in the distributed activation energy model. Energy Fuels 1998, 12:864-869.
26. Miura K., Maki T. Simplified method to estimate f(E) in distributed activation energy model for analyzing coal pyrolysis reaction. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 1998, 31(2):228-235.
27. Órfão J.M. Review and evaluation of the approximations to the temperature integral. AIChE J. 2007, 53:2905-2915.
28. Skrdla P.J. Crystallizations, solid-state phase transformations and dissolution behavior explained dispersive kinetic models based on a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution of activation energies: theory, applications, and practical limitations. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113:9329-9336.
29. Sonobe T., Worasuwannarak N. Kinetic analyses of biomass pyrolysis using the distributed activation energy model. Fuel 2008, 87:414-421.
30. Sun Q., Li W., Chen H., Li B. Devolatilization characteristics of Shenmu coal macerals and kinetic analysis. Energy Sources Part A-Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 2006, 28:865-874.