Evaluation of two heuristic approaches to solve the ontology meta-matching problem

Knowledge and Information Systems

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 225-247

  Martinez Gil, Jorge ^a   Aldana Montes, J F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Information integration; Knowledge management; Ontology meta matching

Indexed keywords

GENETIC ALGORITHMS; HEURISTIC METHODS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

COMPOSITE ALGORITHM; GREEDY STRATEGIES; HEURISTIC APPROACH; INFORMATION INTEGRATION; MATCHING ALGORITHM; ONTOLOGY ALIGNMENT; SIMILARITY MEASURE; TECHNIQUES AND TOOLS;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 78651510181     PISSN: 02191377     EISSN: 02193116     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10115-009-0277-0     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aumueller D, Do HH, Massmann S, Rahm E (2005) Schema and ontology matching with COMA++. In: SIGMOD conference 2005, pp 906-908
2. Baeza-Yates R, Ribeiro-Neto BA (1999) Modern information retrieval. ACM Press, New York. ISBN 0-201-39829-X
3. Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O (2001) The semantic Web. Scientific American, Harlan
4. Buckland MK, Gey FC (1994) The relationship between recall and precision. JASIS 45(1):12-19
5. Cabral L, Domingue J, Motta E, Payne TR, Hakimpour F (2004) Approaches to semantic Web services: an overview and comparisons. In: ESWS 2004, pp 225-239
6. Chen H, Perich F, Finin TW, Joshi A (2004) SOUPA: standard ontology for ubiquitous and pervasive applications. MobiQuitous, pp 258-267
7. Chortaras A, Stamou GB, Stafylopatis A (2005) Learning ontology alignments using recursive neural networks. In: ICANN (2) 2005, pp 811-816
8. Cilibrasi R, Vitanyi PMB (2007) The Google similarity distance. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 19 (3): 370-383
9. Cohen GD, Litsyn S, Zémor G Ongreedyalgorithmsincodingtheory. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 42 (6): 2053-2057
10. Dietz JLG (2005) Enterprise ontology. In: ICEIS 2005, vol 1, p 5
11. Do HH, Rahm E (2002) COMA-a system for flexible combination of schema matching approaches. In: VLDB 2002, pp 610-621
12. Doerr M (2001) Semantic problems of Thesaurus mapping. J. Dig. Inf. 1(8)
13. Domshlak C, Gal A, Roitman H (2007) Rank aggregation for automatic schema matching. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 19(4):538-553
14. Drumm C, Schmitt M, Do HH, Rahm E (2007) Quickmig: automatic schema matching for data migration projects. In CIKM 2007, pp 107-116
15. Ehrig M, Staab S, Sure Y (2005) Bootstrapping ontology alignment methods with APFEL. In: International semantic Web conference 2005, pp 186-200
16. Ehrig M, Sure Y (2005) FOAM-framework for ontology alignment and mapping-results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative. Integr. Ontol.
17. Ehrig M (2007) Ontology alignment: bridging the semantic gap (contents). Springer, Berlin. ISBN 978-0-387-36501-5
18. Euzenat J, Shvaiko P (2007) Ontology matching. Springer, Berlin.
19. Falconer S, Noy N (2007) Ontology mapping-a user survey. In: The second international workshop on ontology matching. ISWC/ASWC, pp 49-60
20. Forrest S (1997) Genetic algorithms. The computer science and engineering handbook, pp 557-571.
21. Gal A, Anaby-Tavor A, Trombetta A, Montesi D (2005) A framework for modeling and evaluating automatic semantic reconciliation. VLDB J 14(1):50-67.
22. Giunchiglia F, Shvaiko P, Yatskevich M (2004) S-Match: an algorithm and an implementation of semantic matching. In: ESWS 2004, pp 61-75
23. He B, Chang KCC (2005) Making holistic schema matching robust: an ensemble approach. In: KDD 2005, pp 429-438
24. Hu W, Cheng G, Zheng D, Zhong X, Qu Y (2006) The results of Falcon-AO in the OAEI 2006 campaign. Ontol Matching.
25. Huang J, Dang J, Vidal JM, Huhns MN (2007) Ontology matching using an artificial neural network to learn weights. In: IJCAI workshop on semantic Web for collaborative knowledge acquisition
26. Ji Q, Liu W, Qi G, Bell DA (2006) LCS: a linguistic combination system for ontology matching. In: KSEM 2006, pp 176-189
27. Jordan MI, Bishop CM (1997) Neural networks. The computer science and engineering handbook, pp 536-556
28. Kiefer C, Bernstein A, Stocker M (2007) The fundamentals of iSPARQL: a virtual triple approach for similarity-based semantic Web tasks. In: ISWC/ASWC 2007, pp 295-309
29. Lambrix P, Tan H (2007) A tool for evaluating ontology alignment strategies. J Data Semant 8:182-202
30. Langley P (1994) Elements of machine learning. ISBN 1-55860-301-8
31. Lee Y, Sayyadian M, Doan A, Rosenthal A (2001) eTuner: tuning schema matching software using synthetic scenarios. VLDB J 16 (1):97-122
32. Levenshtein V (1966) Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals. Soviet Phys Doklady 10:707-710
33. Li Y, Li JZ, Zhang D, Tang J (2006) Result of ontology alignment with RiMOM at OAEI'06. Ontol Matching
34. Maedche A, Motik B, Silva N, Volz R (2002) MAFRA-a MApping FRAmework for distributed ontologies. In EKAW 2002, pp 235-250
35. Madhavan J, Bernstein PA, Rahm E (2001) Generic schema matching with cupid. In: VLDB 2001, pp 49-58
36. Maguitman A, Menczer F, Erdinc F, Roinestad H, Vespignani A (2006) Algorithmic computation and approximation of semantic similarity. World Wide Web 9(4):431-456
37. Martinez-Gil J, Alba E, Aldana-Montes JF (2008) Optimizing ontology alignments by using genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of the workshop on nature based reasoning for the semantic Web. Karlsruhe, Germany
38. Martinez-Gil J, Navas-Delgado I, Aldana-Montes JF (2008) SIFO. An efficient taxonomical matcher for ontology alignment. Technical Report ITI-08-3. Department of Languages and Computing Sciences, University of Malaga
39. Martinez-Gil J, Navas-Delgado I, Polo-Marquez A, Aldana-Montes JF (2008) Comparison of textual renderings of ontologies for improving their alignment. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on complex, intelligent and software intensive systems. Barcelona, Spain, pp 871-876
40. Melnik S, Garcia-Molina H, Rahm E (2002) Similarity flooding: a versatile graph matching algorithm and its application to schema matching. In: Proceedings of international conference on data engineering, pp 117-128
41. Mochol M, Bontas-Simperl EP (2006) A high-level architecture of a metadata-based ontology matching framework. In: DEXA workshops, pp 354-358
42. Navarro G (2001) A guided tour to approximate string matching. ACM Comput Surv 33(1):31-88
43. Niedbala S (2006) OWL-CtxMatch in the OAEI 2006 alignment contest. Ontol Matching
44. Pappa GL, Freitas AA (2009) Evolving rule induction algorithms with multi-objective grammar-based genetic programming. Knowl Inf Syst 19(3):283-309
45. Pfitzner D, Leibbrandt R, Powers D (2009) Characterization and evaluation of similarity measures for pairs of clusterings. Knowl Inf Syst 19(3):361-394
46. Roitman H, Gal A (2006) OntoBuilder: fully automatic extraction and consolidation of ontologies from Web sources using sequence semantics. In: EDBT workshops 2006, pp 573-576
47. Rosenfeld B, Feldman R (2009) Self-supervised relation extraction from the Web. Knowl Inf Syst 17(1):17-33
48. Salton G, Buckley C (1990) Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. JASIS 41(4):288-297
49. Stoilos G, Stamou GB, Kollias SD (2005) A string metric for ontology alignment. In: Proceedings of international semantic Web conference 2005, pp 624-637
50. Kewei T, Yong Y: CMC: combining multiple schema-matching strategies based on credibility prediction. In: DASFAA 2005, pp 888-893
51. Ukkonen E (1992) Approximate string matching with q-grams and maximal matches. Theor Comput Sci 92(1):191-211
52. Wang J, Ding Z, Jiang C (2006) GAOM: genetic algorithm based ontology matching. In: Proceedings of IEEE Asia-Pacific conference on services computing, pp 888-893
53. Wang P, Hu J, Zeng HJ, Chen Z (2009) Using Wikipedia knowledge to improve text classification. Knowl Inf Syst 19(3):265-281
54. Widdows D (2004) Geometry and meaning. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
55. Woon WL, Wong KD (2009) String alignment for automated document versioning. Knowl Inf Syst 18(3):293-309
56. WordNet (2008) http://wordnet.princeton.edu
57. Ziegler P, Kiefer C, Sturm C, Dittrich KR, Bernstein A (2006) Detecting similarities in ontologies with the SOQA-SimPack Toolkit. In: Proceedings of EDBT 2006, pp 59-76