The insidious nature of 'hard-core' alternative conceptions: Implications for the constructivist research programme of patterns in high school students' and pre-service teachers' thinking about ionisation energy

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 259-297

  Taber, Keith S ^a   Tan, Kim Chwee Daniel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Alternative conception; Chemistry education; Conceptual change; Misconception; Research programme; Teacher knowledge

Indexed keywords

EID: 78651508744     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500691003709880     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
2. Banerjee, A. C. (1991). Misconceptions of students and teachers in chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 13(4), 487-494.
3. Blackmore, S. (2000). The power of memes. Scientific American, 283(4), 52-61.
4. Chang, S.-N., & Chiu, M.-H. (2008). Lakatos' scientific research programmes as a framework for analysing informal argumentation about socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 30(13), 1753-1773.
5. Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models in science (vol. XV, pp. 129-186). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
6. Claxton, G. (1993). Minitheories: A preliminary model for learning science. In P. J. Black & A. M. Lucas (Eds.), Children's informal ideas in science (pp. 45-61). London: Routledge.
7. Dal, B. (2006). The origin and extent of student's understandings: The effect of various kinds of factors in conceptual understanding in volcanism. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 11(1), 38-59.
8. De Jong, O., Acampo, J., & Verdonk, A. (1995). Problems in teaching the topic of redox reaction: Actions and conceptions of chemistry teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(10), 1097-1110.
9. Dill, D. (2006). Penetration and shielding [Electronic version]. Supplementary Notes: Quantum Mechanics. Retrieved December 28, 2007, from http://quantum.bu.edu/notes/QuantumMechanics/
10. diSessa, A. A. (1983). Phenomenology and the evolution of intuition. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 15-33). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. diSessa, A. A. (1993). Towards an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2/3), 105-225.
12. diSessa, A. A. (2002). Why 'conceptual ecology' is a good idea. In M. Limón & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 29-60). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
13. Driver, R. (1983). The pupil as scientist? Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
14. Driver, R. (1989). Students' conceptions and the learning of science [Special issue]. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 481-490.
15. Driver, R., & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61-84.
16. Driver, R., & Erickson, G. (1983). Theories-in-action: Some theoretical and empirical issues in the study of students' conceptual frameworks in science. Studies in Science Education, 10, 37-60.
17. Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children's ideas and the learning of science. In R. Driver, E. Guesne, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children's ideas in science (pp. 1-9). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
18. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
19. Driver, R., & Oldham, V. (1986). A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science. Studies in Science Education, 13, 105-122.
20. Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children's ideas. London: Routledge.
21. Duit, R. (1991). Students' conceptual frameworks: Consequences for learning science. In S. M. Glynn, R. H. Yeany, & B. K. Britton (Eds.), The psychology of learning science (pp. 65-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Duit, R. (2009). Bibliography-Students' and teachers' conceptions and science education. Retrieved March 21, 2010, from http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html
23. Fensham, P. J., Gunstone, R. F., & White, R. T. (1994). The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning. London: Falmer Press.
24. Finster, D. C. (1991). Developmental instruction: Part 2. Application of Perry's model to general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 68(9), 752-756.
25. Georgiou, A. K. A. (2005). Thought experiments in physics learning: On intuition and imagistic simulation. M.Phil. thesis, Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge.
26. Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (1999). Examining pedagogical content knowledge. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
27. Gilbert, J. K. (2005). Visualization: A metacognitive skill in science and science education. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in science education (pp. 9-27). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
28. Gilbert, J. K., & Boulter, C. J. (Eds.). (2000). Developing models in science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
29. Gilbert, J. K., Osborne, R. J., & Fensham, P. J. (1982). Children's science and its consequences for teaching. Science Education, 66(4), 623-633.
30. Gilbert, J. K., & Swift, D. J. (1985). Towards a Lakatosian analysis of the Piagetian and alternative conceptions research programs. Science Education, 69(5), 681-696.
31. Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. F. (Eds.). (2009). Chemical education: Linking the representational levels of chemistry. Dordrecht: Springer.
32. Gilbert, J. K., & Watts, D. M. (1983). Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: Changing perspectives in science education. Studies in Science Education, 10, 61-98.
33. Goodwin, A. (2002). Teachers' continuing learning of chemistry: Some implications for science teaching. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 3(3), 345-359.
34. Griffiths, A. K., & Preston, K. R. (1992). Grade-12 students' misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 611-628.
35. Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E., & Smith, C. L. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 799-822.
36. Haidar, A. H. (1997). Prospective chemistry teachers' conceptions of the conservation of matter and related concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 181-197.
37. Hammer, D. (2004). The variability of student reasoning, Lecture 3: Manifold cognitive resources. In E. F. Redish & M. Vicentini (Eds.), Research on physics education (pp. 321-340). Bologna/Amsterdam: Italian Physical Society/IOS Press.
38. Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (1996). Secondary students' mental models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching chemistry. Science Education, 80(5), 509-534.
39. Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). Learning about atoms, molecules, and chemical bonds: A case study of multiple-model use in Grade 11 chemistry. Science Education, 84, 352-381.
40. Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2000). History and philosophy of science through models: Some challenges in the case of 'the atom'. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 993-1009.
41. Key Stage 3 National Strategy. (2002). Framework for teaching science: Years 7, 8 and 9. London: Department for Education and Skills.
42. Kramer, D. A. (1983). Post-formal operations? A need for further conceptualization. Human Development, 26, 91-105.
43. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrove (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91-196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Leach, J., & Scott, P. (2002). Designing and evaluating science teaching sequences: An approach drawing upon the concept of learning demand and a social constructivist perspective on learning. Studies in Science Education, 38, 115-142.
45. Lin, H. S., Cheng, H. J., & Lawrenz, F. (2000). The assessment of students' and teachers' understanding of gas laws. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(2), 235-237.
46. McCloskey, M. (1983). Intuitive physics. Scientific American, 248(4), 114-122.
47. Millar, R. (1989). Constructive criticisms [Special issue]. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 587-596.
48. Osborne, R. J., & Wittrock, M. C. (1983). Learning science: A generative process. Science Education, 67(4), 489-508.
49. Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
50. Petri, J., & Niedderer, H. (1998). A learning pathway in high-school level quantum atomic physics. International Journal of Science Education, 20(9), 1075-1088.
51. Piaget, J. (1972). The principles of genetic epistemology (W. Mays, Trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
52. Pope, M. L., & Denicolo, P. (1986). Intuitive theories-A researcher's dilemma: Some practical methodological implications. British Educational Research Journal, 12(2), 153-166.
53. Pope, M. L., & Gilbert, J. K. (1983). Personal experience and the construction of knowledge in science. Science Education, 67(2), 193-203.
54. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Towards a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.
55. Quilez-Pardo, J., & Solaz-Portoles, J. J. (1995). Students' and teachers' misapplication of Le Chatelier's principle: Implications for the teaching of chemical equilibrium. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(9), 939-957.
56. Russell, T., & Osborne, J. (1993, August). Constructivist research, curriculum development and practice in primary classrooms: Reflections on five years of activity in the Science Processes and Concept Exploration (SPACE) Project. Paper presented at the 3rd international seminar on Misconceptions in the Learning of Science and Mathematics, Cornell University.
57. Scerri, E. R. (2000). Have orbitals really been observed? Journal of Chemical Education, 77(11), 1492-1494.
58. Schmidt, H.-J. (1991). A label as a hidden persuader: Chemists' neutralization concept. International Journal of Science Education, 13(4), 459-471.
59. Shayer, M., & Adey, P. (1981). Towards a science of science teaching: Cognitive development and curriculum demand. Oxford: Heinemann Educational Books.
60. Singapore Examinations and Assessment Board. (2009). Chemistry Higher 2 (Syllabus 9647). Singapore: Author.
61. Solomon, J. (1992). Getting to know about energy-In school and society. London: Falmer Press.
62. Taber, K. S. (1998a). An alternative conceptual framework from chemistry education. International Journal of Science Education, 20(5), 597-608.
63. Taber, K. S. (1998b). The sharing-out of nuclear attraction: Or I can't think about physics in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 20(8), 1001-1014.
64. Taber, K. S. (2000). Multiple frameworks? Evidence of manifold conceptions in individual cognitive structure. International Journal of Science Education, 22(4), 399-417.
65. Taber, K. S. (2001a). Shifting sands: A case study of conceptual development as competition between alternative conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 23(7), 731-753.
66. Taber, K. S. (2001b). When the analogy breaks down: Modelling the atom on the solar system. Physics Education, 36(3), 222-226.
67. Taber, K. S. (2003). Understanding ionisation energy: Physical, chemical and alternative conceptions. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 4(2), 149-169.
68. Taber, K. S. (2005). Learning quanta: Barriers to stimulating transitions in student understanding of orbital ideas. Science Education, 89(1), 94-116.
69. Taber, K. S. (2006). Beyond constructivism: The progressive research programme into learning science. Studies in Science Education, 42, 125-184.
70. Taber, K. S. (2008a). Conceptual resources for learning science: Issues of transience and grainsize in cognition and cognitive structure. International Journal of Science Education, 30(8), 1027-1053.
71. Taber, K. S. (2008b). Exploring conceptual integration in student thinking: Evidence from a case study. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1915-1943.
72. Taber, K. S. (2008c). Of models, mermaids and methods: The role of analytical pluralism in understanding student learning in science. In I. V. Eriksson (Ed.), Science education in the 21st century (pp. 69-106). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
73. Taber, K. S. (2009a). Learning at the symbolic level. In J. K. Gilbert & D. F. Treagust (Eds.), Multiple representations in chemical education (pp. 75-108). Dordrecht: Springer.
74. Taber, K. S. (2009b). Progressing science education: Constructing the scientific research programme into the contingent nature of learning science. Dordrecht: Springer.
75. Tan, K. C. D., Goh, N.-K., Chia, L.-S., & Taber, K. S. (2005). Development of a two-tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument to determine A-level students' understanding of ionisation energy. Singapore: National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University.
76. Tan, K. C. D., & Taber, K. S. (2005). What comes after stable octet? Stable sub-shell! Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 28(1), 81-102.
77. Tan, K. C. D., & Taber, K. S. (2009). Ionization energy: Implications of pre-service teachers' conceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 86(5), 623-629.
78. Tan, K. C. D., Taber, K. S., Goh, N.-K., & Chia, L.-S. (2005). The ionisation energy diagnostic instrument: A two-tier multiple choice instrument to determine high school students' understanding of ionisation energy. Chemistry Education Research & Practice, 6(4), 180-197.
79. Tan, K. C. D., Taber, K. S., Liu, X., Coll, R. K., Lorenzo, M., Li, J., et al. (2008). Students' conceptions of ionisation energy: A cross-cultural study. International Journal of Science Education, 30(2), 263-283.
80. Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students' misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159-169.
81. Trumper, R. (2001). A cross-college age study of science and nonscience students' conceptions of basic astronomy concepts in preservice training for high-school teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(2), 189-195.
82. Tsaparlis, G. (1994). Blocking mechanisms in problem solving from the Pascual-Leone's M-space perspective. In H.-J. Schmidt (Ed.), Problem solving and misconceptions in chemistry and physics (pp. 211-226). Dortmund: International Council of Association for Science Education.
83. Watts, M. (1983). A study of schoolchildren's alternative frameworks of the concept of force. European Journal of Science Education, 5(2), 217-230.
84. Watts, M., and M. L. Pope. (1982, September). A Lakatosian view of the young personal scientist. Paper presented at the British conference on Personal Construct Psychology, University of Manchester Institute of Science & Technology, Manchester.
85. White, R. T. (1985). Interview protocols and dimensions of cognitive structure. In L. H. T. West & A. L. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 51-59). London: Academic Press.