'Linguistic injustice' is not black and white

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 58-59

  Guariguata, Manuel R ^a   Sheil, Douglas ^a,b   Murdiyarso, Daniel ^a  

^a CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY RESEARCH   (Indonesia)

^b Institute of Tropical Forest Conservation ITFC   (Uganda)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LANGUAGE; LETTER; PEER REVIEW; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARD;

LANGUAGE; PEER REVIEW; PREJUDICE; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH;

EID: 78651505126     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.11.001     Document Type: Letter

References (7)

1. Clavero M. 'Awkward wording. Rephrase': linguistic injustice in ecological journals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010, 25:552-553.
2. Salager-Meyer F. Scientific publishing in developing countries: challenges for the future. J. English Acad. Purp. 2008, 7:121-232.
3. Hwee L.S. What is the definition of a native speaker of English?. Write Stuff 2006, 15:47.
4. Ferguson G. The global spread of English, scientific communication and ESP: questions of equity, access and domain loss. Iberica 2007, 13:7-38.
5. Ross J.S., et al. Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance. JAMA 2006, 295:1675-1680.
6. Vasconcelos S.M.R. Around the world: teaching medical writing to doctors and scientists. Write Stuff 2007, 16:12-15.
7. Benfield J., Feak C.B. How authors can cope with the burden of English as an international language. Chest 2006, 129:1728-1730.