The Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit on Marriage and Divorce: Evidence from Flow Data

Population Research and Policy Review

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 101-128

  Herbst, Chris M ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Earned Income Tax Credit; Flow data; Marriage penalties

Indexed keywords

DEMOGRAPHIC TREND; DIVORCE; INCOME; MARRIAGE; POLICY REFORM; POPULATION POLICY; SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT; STATISTICAL DATA; TAX SYSTEM;

EID: 78651498733     PISSN: 01675923     EISSN: 15737829     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11113-010-9180-3     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Acs, G., & Maag, E. (2005). Irreconcilable differences? The conflict between marriage promotion initiatives for cohabitating couples with children and marriage penalties in the tax and transfer systems. Policy Brief No. B-66. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
2. Alm, J., & Whittington, L. (1995). Income taxes and the marriage decision. Applied Economics, 27, 25-31.
3. Alm, J., & Whittington, L. (1997). Income taxes and the timing of marital decisions. Journal of Public Economics, 64, 219-240.
4. Baughman, R., & Dickert-Conlin, S. (2009). The earned income tax credit and fertility. Journal of Population Economics, 22, 537-563.
5. Becker, G. (1973). A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 813-846.
6. Bennett, N., Bloom, D., & Miller, C. (1995). The influence of nonmarital childbearing on the formation of first marriages. Demography, 32, 47-62.
7. Besley, T., & Case, A. (2000). Unnatural experiments? Estimating the incidence of endogenous policies. The Economic Journal, 110, F672-F694.
8. Bitler, M., Gelbach, J., Hoynes, H., & Zavodny, M. (2004). The impact of welfare reform on marriage and divorce. Demography, 41, 213-236.
9. Blackwell, D., & Lichter, D. (2000). Mate selection among married and cohabiting couples. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 275-302.
10. Blank, R. (1999). Analyzing the length of welfare spells. Journal of Public Economics, 39, 245-274.
11. Blank, R. (2002). Evaluating welfare reform in the U. S. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 1105-1166.
12. Blau, F. D., Kahn, L. M., & Waldfogel, J. (2000). Understanding young women's marriage decisions: The role of labor and marriage market conditions. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 53, 624-647.
13. Brien, M. J. (1997). Racial differences in marriage and the role of marriage markets. Journal of Human Resources, 32, 741-778.
14. Cherlin, A. (1977). The effect of children on marital dissolution. Demography, 14, 265-272.
15. Clarkberg, M., Stolzenberg, R. M., & Waite, L. J. (1995). Attitudes, values, and entrance into cohabitational versus marital unions. Social Forces, 74, 609-634.
16. Congressional Budget Office. (1997). For better or for worse: Marriage and the federal income tax. http://www. cbo. gov/showdoc. cfm?index=7& sequence=o.
17. Crouse, G. (1999). State implementation of major changes to welfare policies 1992-1998. Retrieved September 1, 2006, from http://aspe. hhs. gov/HSP/WaiverPolicies99/policy_CEA. htm.
18. Dickert-Conlin, S. (1999). Taxes and transfers: Their effect on the decision to end a marriage. Journal of Public Economics, 73, 217-240.
19. Dickert-Conlin, S., & Houser, S. (1998). Taxes and transfers: A new look at the marriage penalty. National Tax Journal, 51, 175-218.
20. Dickert-Conlin, S., & Houser, S. (1999). EITC, AFDC, and the female headship decision. Discussion paper no. 1192-99. Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin.
21. Dickert-Conlin, S., & Houser, S. (2002). EITC and marriage. National Tax Journal, LV, 25-40.
22. Duchovny, N. (2001). The Earned Income Tax Credit and fertility. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Maryland, Department of Economics.
23. Eissa, N., & Hoynes, H. (2004). Taxes and labor market participation of married couples: The Earned Income Tax Credit. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1931-1958.
24. Ellwood, D. (2000). The impact of the earned income tax credit and social policy reforms on work, marriage, and living arrangements. National Tax Journal, 53, 1063-1105.
25. Ellwood, D., & Jencks, C. (2001). The growing differences in family structure: What do we know? Where do we look for answers? Working paper. Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
26. Fang, H., & Keane, M. (2004). Assessing the impact of welfare reform on single mothers. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 1-116.
27. Fitzgerald, J. M., & Ribar, D. (2004). Welfare reform and female headship. Demography, 41, 189-212.
28. Friedberg, L. (1998). Did unilateral divorce raise divorce rates? Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 88, 608-627.
29. Gittleman, M. (2001). Declining caseloads: What do the dynamics of welfare participation reveal? Industrial Relations, 40, 537-570.
30. Goldstein, J. (1999). The leveling of divorce in the United States. Demography, 36, 409-414.
31. Gray, V. (1973). Innovation in the states: A diffusion study. American Political Science Review, 67, 1174-1185.
32. Grogger, J. (2003). The effects of time limits, the EITC, and other policy changes on welfare use, work, and income among female-headed families. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 394-408.
33. Hoffman, S. (2003). The EITC marriage tax and EITC reform. Working paper no. 2003-01. University of Delaware, Department of Economics.
34. Holtzblatt, J., & Rebelein, R. (2000). Measuring the effect of the Earned Income Tax Credit on marriage penalties and bonuses. National Tax Journal, 53, 1107-1134.
35. Horvath-Rose, A., & Peters, H. E. (2001). Welfare waivers and non-marital childbearing. In G. Duncan & L. Chase-Lansdale (Eds.), Welfare reform: For better, for worse. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
36. Hoynes, H. (1997). Does welfare play any role in female headship decisions? Journal of Public Economics, 65, 89-117.
37. Joyce, J., Pearce, W., I. I. I., & Rosenbloom, J. (2001). The effects of child-bearing on women's marital status: Using twin births as a natural experiment. Economics Letters, 70, 133-138.
38. Kaushal, N., & Kaestner, R. (2001). From welfare to work: Has welfare reform worked? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20, 699-719.
39. Lichter, D. T., Anderson, R., & Wayward, M. (1995). Marriage markets and marital choice. Journal of Family Issues, 16, 412-431.
40. Lichter, D. T., McLaughlin, D. K., & Ribar, D. C. (2002). Economic restructuring and the retreat from marriage. Social Science Research, 31, 230-256.
41. Looney, A. (2005). The effects of welfare reform and related policies on single mothers' welfare use and employment in the 1990s. Working paper 2005-45. Finance and economics discussion series. Washington, DC: Federal Reserve Board.
42. McCubbin, J. (2000). EITC noncompliance: The determinants of misreporting of children. National Tax Journal, 53, 1135-1164.
43. Meyer, B., & Rosenbaum, D. (2001). Welfare, the earned income tax credit, and the labor supply of single mothers. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1063-1114.
44. Moffitt, R. (1994). Welfare effects on female headship with area effects. Journal of Human Resources, 29, 621-636.
45. Moffitt, R. (1998). The effect of welfare on marriage and fertility. In R. Moffitt (Ed.), Welfare, the family, and reproductive behavior. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
46. Moffitt, R., & Rendall, M. (1995). Cohort trends in the lifetime distribution of female family headship in the United States. Demography, 32, 407-424.
47. Mooney, C., & Lee, M. (1995). Legislative morality in the American states: The case of pre-Roe abortion regulation reform. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 599-627.
48. Nagle, A., & Johnson, N. (2006). A hand up: How state Earned Income Tax Credits help working families escape poverty in 2006. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
49. Qian, Z., Lichter, D., & Mellott, L. (2005). Out-of-wedlock childbearing, marital prospects, and mate selection. Social Forces, 84, 473-491.
50. Ressler, R. A., & Waters, M. S. (2000). Female earnings and the divorce rate: A Simultaneous equations model. Applied Economics, 32, 1889-1898.
51. Rosenbaum, D. (2000). Taxes, the Earned Income Tax Credit, and marriage. Working paper. University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Department of Economics.
52. Schoeni, R., & Blank, R. (2000). What has welfare reform accomplished? Impacts on welfare participation, employment, income, poverty, and family structure. Working paper no. 7627. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
53. Scholz, J. K. (1994). The Earned Income Tax Credit: Participation, compliance, and anti-poverty effectiveness. National Tax Journal, 47, 63-87.
54. Scholz, J. K. (1997). Deputy assistant secretary for tax analysis, U. S. Department of the Treasury. Testimony before the U. S. House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means. Washington, DC, May, 1997.
55. Shipan, C., & Volden, C. (2008). The mechanisms of policy diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 840-857.
56. Steele, F., Kallis, C., Goldstein, H., & Joshi, H. (2005). The relationship between childbearing and transitions from marriage and cohabitation in Britain. Demography, 42, 647-673.
57. Thorton, A., & Rodgers, W. (1987). The influence of individual and historical time on marital dissolution. Demography, 24, 1-22.
58. U. S. Census Bureau. (2004). Number, timing and duration of marriages and divorces, 2004. http://www. census. gov/population/www/socdemo/marr-div/2004detailed_tables. html.
59. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (U. S. DHHS). (1997). Setting the baseline: A report on state welfare waivers. Retrieved September 1, 2006, from http://aspe. hhs. gov/HSP/isp/waiver2/title. htm.
60. U. S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service. (2002). Compliance estimates for Earned Income Tax Credit claimed on 1999 returns. http://www. irs. gov/pub/irs-utl/compesteitc99. pdf.
61. U. S. General Accountability Office (U. S. GAO). (1997). Welfare reform: States' early experiences with benefit termination. Report No. HEHS-97-74. Washington, DC: U. S. General Accountability Office.
62. U. S. General Accounting Office (U. S. GAO). (1992). Earned Income Tax Credit: Advance payment option is not widely known or understood by the public. GAO/GGD-92-26. Washington, DC: U. S. General Accounting Office.
63. U. S. General Accounting Office (U. S. GAO). (1996). Income tax treatment of married and single individuals. Report No. GAO/GGD-96-175. Washington, DC: U. S. General Accounting Office.
64. U. S. House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means (2004). Green book, background on material and data on programs within the jurisdiction of the committee on ways and means. Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office.
65. Whittington, L. (1992). Taxes and the family: The impact of the tax exemption for dependents on marital fertility. Demography, 29, 215-226.
66. Whittington, L., & Alm, J. (1997). Till death or taxes do us part: The effect of income taxation on divorce. Journal of Human Resources, 32, 388-412.
67. Whittington, L., Alm, J., & Peters, E. (1990). Fertility and the personal exemption: Implicit pronatalist policy in the United States. American Economic Review, 80, 545-556.
68. Wolfers, J. (2006). Did unilateral divorce laws raise divorce rates? A reconciliation and new results. American Economic Review, 96, 1802-1820.
69. Wooldridge, J. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.