'Governance without governance'1: How nature policy was democratized in the Netherlands

Critical Policy Studies

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 344-361

  Turnhout, Esther ^a   van der Zouwen, Mariëlle ^b  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b KWR WATERCYCLE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Civil society; Governance; Legitimacy; Nature conservation policy; Participation

Indexed keywords

EID: 78651490197     PISSN: 19460171     EISSN: 1946018X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2010.525899     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Arnstein, S.R., 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American planning association, 35 (4), 216-224.
2. Arts, B., 1998. The political influence of global NGOs. Case studies on the climate and biodiversity conventions. Utrecht: International Books.
3. Bulkeley, H. and Mol, A.P.J., 2003. Participation and environmental governance: consensus, ambivalence and debate. Environmental values, 12 (2), 143-154.
4. Cooke, B. and Kothari, U., 2001. The case for participation as tyranny. In: B. Cooke and U. Kothari, eds. Participation, the new tyranny? London: Zed Books, 1-15.
5. Cornwall, A., 2002. Making spaces, changing places: situating participation in development. Institute of Development Studies, IDS Working Paper 170.
6. Fiorino, D.J., 1990. Citizen participation and environmental risk: a survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, technology, & human values, 15 (2), 226-243.
7. Funtowicz, S.O. and Ravetz, J.R., 1993. Science for the post normal age. Futures, September, 739-755.
8. Gibbons, M., et al., 1994. The new production of knowledge-the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: SAGE.
9. Goodwin, P., 1998. 'Hired hands' or 'local voice': understandings and experience of local participation in conservation. Transactions of the institute of British geographers, 23 (4), 481-499.
10. Hajer, M.A., 2003. Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy sciences, 36 (2), 175-195.
11. Hajer, M.A. and Wagenaar H., eds., 2003. Deliberative policy analysis, understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G., 2001. Multi-level governance and European integration. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
13. Innes, J.E. and Booher, D.E., 1999. Consensus building and complex adaptive systems. Journal of the American planning association, 65 (4), 412-423.
14. Jasanoff, S., 1997. Civilization and madness: The great BSE scare of 1996. Public understanding of science, 6 (3), 221-236.
15. Joerges, C. and Neyer, J., 2003. Politics, risk management, World Trade Organisation governance and the limits of legalisation. Science and public policy, 30 (3), 219-225.
16. Kabeer, N., 1996. Reversed realities: gender hierarchies in development thought. New Delhi: Kali for Women.
17. Kesby, M., 2007. Spatialising participatory approaches: the contribution of geography to a mature debate. Environment and planning A, 39 (12), 2813-2831.
18. Kooiman, J., 2000. Societal governance: levels, modes, and orders of social-political interaction. In: J. Pierre, ed. Debating governance: authenticity, steering, and democracy. Oxford University Press, 138-166.
19. Lawrence, A., 2006. 'No personal motive?' Volunteers, biodiversity, and the false dichotomies of participation. Ethics, place and environment, 9 (3), 279-298.
20. Lijphart, A., 1968. The politics of accommodation, pluralism and democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
21. LNV, 1990. Natuurbeleidsplan, regeringsbeslissing. Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij. Tweede Kamer, vergaderjaar 1989-1990, 21149, nrs. 2-3.
22. LNV, 1992. Nota landschap, regeringsbeslissing. Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij.
23. LNV, 1993. Bosbeleidsplan. Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij.
24. LNV, 1994. Natuurbeleid in de peiling, een tussentijdse balans van het Natuurbeleidsplan. Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij.
25. LNV, 1996. Visie stadslandschappen, discussienota. Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij.
26. LNV, 1999. Verzameling reacties of eerste concept, met twee aanvullingen. Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij.
27. LNV, 2000. Nature for people-people for nature: nature, forest and landscape in the 21st century. Ministry of LNV: The Hague.
28. LNV and IPO, 1999. Evaluatie van het natuur-, bos-en landschapsbeleid. Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij, Interprovinciaal Overleg.
29. Mohan, G. and Stokke, K., 2000. Participatory development and empowerment: the dangers of localism. Third world quarterly, 21 (2), 247-268.
30. Nandigama, S., 2009. Transformations in the making: actor-networks, elite-control and gender dynamics in community forest management intervention in Adavipalli, Andhra Pradesh, India. Thesis (PhD), International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University (ISS), The Netherlands.
31. O'Neill, J., 2001. Representing people, representing nature, representing the world. Environment and planning C, 19 (4), 483-500.
32. Parfitt, T., 2004. The ambiguity of participation: a qualified defence of participatory development. Third world quarterly, 25 (3), 537-556.
33. Pellizzoni, L., 2001a. Democracy and the governance of uncertainty, the case of agricultural gene technologies. Journal of hazardous materials, 86 (1), 205-222.
34. Pellizzoni, L., 2001b. The myth of the best argument: power, deliberation and reason. British journal of sociology, 52 (1), 59-86.
35. Peters, B.G. and Pierre, J., 1998. Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. Journal of public administration theory and research, 8 (2), 223-243.
36. Pierre, J. and Peters, B.G., 2000. Governance, politics & the state. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
37. Rhodes, R.A.W., 1996. The new governance: governing without government. Political studies, 44, 652-667.
38. RLG, 1998. Natuurbeleid dat verder gaat, advies over voorgang en vernieuwing van het natuurbeleid. Raad voor het Landelijk Gebied. Report number 98/8.
39. Rowe, G. and Frewer, L.J., 2000. Public participation methods, a framework for evaluation. Science, technology, & human values, 25 (1), 3-29.
40. Turnhout, E., 2003. Ecological indicators in Dutch nature conservation: science and policy intertwined in the classification and evaluation of nature. Amsterdam: Aksant.
41. Turnhout, E., 2009. The effectiveness of boundary objects: the case of ecological indicators. Science and public policy, 36 (5), 403-412.
42. Turnhout, E., 2010. Heads in the clouds: knowledge democracy as a utopian dream. In: R.J. In 't Veld, ed. Knowledge democracy, consequences for science, politics and media. Berlin: Springer, 25-36.
43. Turnhout, E., Van Bommel, S. and Aarts, N., 2010. How participation creates citizens: participatory governance as performative practice. Ecology and Society, 15 (4), 26. Available from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art26/.
44. Van Asselt, M.B.A. and Rijkens-Klomp, N., 2002. A look in the mirror: reflection on participation in integrated assessment from a methodological perspective. Global environmental change, 12 (3), 107-180.
45. Van Kersbergen, K. and Van Waarden, F., 2004. 'Governance' as a bridge between disciplines: cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy. European journal of political research, 43 (2), 143-171.
46. Van der Zouwen, M.W., 2006. Nature policy between trends and traditions-dynamics in nature policy arrangements in the Yorkshire Dales, Doñana and the Veluwe. Delft: Eburon.
47. Van Tatenhove, J., Mak, J. and Liefferink, D., 2006. The inter-play between formal and informal practices. Perspectives on European politics and society, 7 (1), 8-24.
48. Van Waarden, F., 1992. The historical institutionalization of typical national patterns in policy networks between state and industry. A comparison of the USA and the Netherlands. European journal of political research, 21 (1-2), 131-162.
49. WRR, 1998. Ruimtelijke ontwikkelingspolitiek. Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid. Report number 53.