Correlation between shrinkage and infection of implanted synthetic meshes using an animal model of mesh infection

International Urogynecology Journal

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 47-52

  Mamy, Laurent ^a,b   Letouzey, Vincent ^a   Lavigne, Jean Philippe ^c   Garric, Xavier ^d   Gondry, Jean ^b   Mares, Pierre ^a   De Tayrac, Renaud ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF NEUROLOGY   (France)

^b Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology   (France)

^c INSERM   (France)

^d UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

Author keywords

Infection; Mesh; Poly (lactic acid); Polypropylene; Shrinkage

Indexed keywords

POLYLACTIC ACID; POLYPROPYLENE;

ABDOMINAL WALL HERNIA; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; COLONY FORMING UNIT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; HERNIOPLASTY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; IATROGENIC DISEASE; MESH INFECTION; MESH SHRINKAGE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;

EID: 78651478685     PISSN: 09373462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-010-1245-7     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. P Collinet F Belot P Debodinance E Ha Duc JP Lucot M Cosson 2006 Transvaginal mesh technique for pelvic organ prolapse repair: mesh exposure management and risk factors Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17 315 320 10.1007/s00192-005-0003-8 16228121
2. D De Ridder 2008 Should we use meshes in the management of vaginal prolapse? Curr Opin Urol 18 377 382 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3282fceaae 18520758
3. JM Bellon J Bujan L Contreras A Hernando 1995 Integration of biomaterials implanted into abdominal wall: process of scar formation and macrophage response Biomaterials 16 381 387 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXks1yjtrs%3D 10.1016/0142-9612(95)98855-8 7662823
4. C Birch MM Fynes 2002 The role of synthetic and biological prostheses in reconstructive pelvic floor surgery Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 14 527 535 10.1097/00001703-200210000-00015 12401983
5. M Cosson 2004 Risk of infection and prostheses: time out or a red flag? J Gynécol Obstét Biol Reprod 33 559 560 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2crotVyluw%3D%3D
6. SH Dougherty 1988 Pathobiology of infection in prosthetic devices Rev Infect Dis 10 1102 1117 1:STN:280:DyaL1M%2FosVakug%3D%3D 3060941
7. YH An RJ Friedman 1998 Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterial surfaces J Biomed Mater Res 43 338 348 1:CAS:528: DyaK1cXls1Ghs74%3D 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199823)43:3<338::AID-JBM16>3.0. CO;2-B 9730073
8. Marshall K (1985) Mechanisms of bacterial adhesions at solid-water interfaces. In: Savage D, Fletcher M (eds) Bacterial adhesion. Mechanisms and physiological significance. Plenum, New York
9. KH Huang FT Kung HM Liang SY Chang 2005 Management of polypropylene mesh erosion after intravaginal midurethral sling operation for female stress urinary incontinence Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16 437 440 10.1007/s00192-004-1275-0 15654499
10. R de Tayrac MC Oliva-Lauraire I Guiraud L Henry M Vert P Mares 2007 Long-lasting bioresorbable poly(lactic acid) 94 mesh: a new approach for soft tissue reinforcement based on an experimental pilot study Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18 1007 1014 10.1007/s00192-006-0270-z 17211529
11. R de Tayrac S Chentouf H Garreau C Braud I Guiraud P Boudeville M Vert 2008 In vitro degradation and in vivo biocompatibility of poly(lactic acid) 94 mesh for soft tissue reinforcement in vaginal surgery J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 85 529 536 18161812
12. A Alponat SR Lakshminarasappa N Yavuz PMY Goh 1997 Prevention of adhesions by Seprefilm, an absorbable adhesion barrier: an incisional hernia model in rats Am Surg 63 818 819 1:STN:280:DyaK2svjsFylsw%3D%3D 9290528
13. F Zheng Y Lin E Verbeken, et al. 2004 Host response after reconstruction of abdominal wall defects with porcine dermal collagen in a rat model Am J Obstet Gynecol 191 1961 1970 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtVKltrzI 10.1016/j.ajog.2004. 01.091 15592278
14. ML Mathé JP Lavigne MC Oliva-Lauraire I Guiraud P Marès R de Tayrac 2007 Comparison of different biomaterials for vaginal surgery using an in vivo model of meshes infection in rats Gynécol Obstét Fertil 35 398 405 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2007.02.024 17434330
15. R Hiltunen K Nieminen T Takala, et al. 2007 Low weight polypropylene mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial Obstet Gynecol 110 455 462 10.1097/01.AOG.0000261899.87638.0a 17666627
16. JN Nguyen RJ Burchette 2008 Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial Obstet Gynecol 111 891 898 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816a2489 18378748
17. AA Sivaslioglu E Unlubilgin I Dolen 2008 A randomized comparison of polypropylene mesh surgery with site specific surgery in the treatment of cystocele Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19 467 471 1:STN:280: DC%2BD1czmsl2jsw%3D%3D 10.1007/s00192-007-0465-y 17901910
18. D Weyhe P Hoffmann O Belyaev K Mros C Muller W Uhl F Schmitz 2007 The role of TGF-beta1 as a determinant of foreign body reaction to alloplastic materials in rat fibroblast cultures: comparison of different commercially available polypropylene meshes for hernia repair Regul Pept 138 1 10 14 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtF2qsw%3D%3D 10.1016/j.regpep.2006.07.010 16973225 Epub 2006 Sep 12
19. F Sergent N Desilles Y Lacoume C Bunel JP Marie L Marpeau 2009 Experimental biomechanical evaluation of polypropylene prostheses used in pelvic organ prolapse surgery Int Urogynecol J 20 597 604 10.1007/s00192-009-0825-x
20. Judlin P (2002) Infections in gynecology. Masson, Paris, pp p6-p7
21. AG Gristina 1987 Biomaterial-centered infection: microbial adhesion versus tissue integration Science 237 1588 1595 1:CAS:528:DyaL2sXls1WntLw%3D 10.1126/science.3629258 3629258
22. U Klinge K Junge B Spellerberg C Piroth B Klosterhalfen V Schumpelick 2002 Do multifilament alloplastic meshes increase the infection rate? Analysis of the polymeric surface, the bacteria adherence, and the in vivo consequences in a rat model J Biomed Mater Res 63 765 771 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xpt1eks7o%3D 10.1002/jbm.10449 12418022