The cool and belkin faceted classification of information interactions revisited

Information Research

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2010, Pages

  Huvila, Isto ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78651451748     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13681613     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abraham, A., Petre, M. & Sharp, H. (2007). Information seeking and sensemaking for personal fit. Paper presented at the ACM SIGCHI 2007 Workshop on Exploratory Search and HCI: Designing and Evaluating Interfaces to Support Exploratory Search Interaction, 29 April 2007, San Jose, CA, USA. /li>
2. Balatsoukas, P., Morris, A. & O'Brien, A. (2009). An evaluation framework of user interaction with metadata surrogates. Journal of Information Science, 35(3), 321-339.
3. Barry, C. (1997). The research activity timeline: a qualitative tool for information research. Library & Information Science Research, 19(2), 153-179.
4. Belkin, N.J. (2008). Some(what) grand challenges for information retrieval. SIGIR Forum, 42(1), 47-54.
5. Belkin, N.J., Marchetti, P.G. & Cool, C. (1993). Braque: design of an interface to support user interaction in information retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 29(3), 325-344.
6. Bowker, G. C. & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
7. Broughton, V. (2006). The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval. Aslib Proceedings, 58(1/2), 49-72.
8. Byström, K. & Hansen, P. (2005). Conceptual framework for tasks in information studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(10), 1050-1061.
9. Checkland, P. & Scholes, J. (1990). Soft systems methodology in action. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
10. Cool, C. & Belkin, N. (2002). A classification of interactions with information. In H. Bruce (Ed.), Emerging Frameworks and Methods: CoLIS4: proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science, Seattle, WA, USA, July 21-25, 2002, (pp. 1-15). Greenwood Village, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
11. Corbin, J. M. & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21.
12. Dervin, B. (1998). Sense-making theory and practice: an overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(2), 36-46.
13. Ellis, D. (1993). Modeling the information-seeking patterns of academic researchers. Library Quarterly, 63(4), 469-486.
14. Erdelez, S. (1997). Information encountering: a conceptual framework for accidental information discovery. In P. Vakkari, R. Savolainen, & B. Dervin (Eds.), ISIC '96: Proceedings of an international conference on Information seeking in context, (pp. 125-146). London: Taylor Graham.
15. Foster, A. (2004). A nonlinear model of information-seeking behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(3), 228-237.
16. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The perception of the visual world. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
17. Hartel, J. (2003). The serious leisure frontier in library and information science: Hobby domains. Knowledge organization, 30(3-4), 228-238.
18. Hartel, J., Kari, J. & Stebbins, R. (2009). Towards positive information science. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 46(1), 1-5
19. Heckner, M., Heilemann, M. & Wolff, C. (2009). Personal information management vs. resource sharing: towards a model of information behavior in social tagging systems. In aper at the Third nternational Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM-09, Nashville, Tennessee, US.
20. Hjørland, B. & Albrechtsen, H. (1995). Toward new horizon in information science: domain analysis. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 46(6), 400-425.
21. Huvila, I. (2006a). The ecology of information work - a case study of bridging archaeological work and virtual reality based knowledge organisation. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University Press. (Dissertation of Åbo Akademi University)
22. Huvila, I. (2008a). Entä informaatiokirjoitustaito? (What about information writing literacy?) In Reader- and user-oriented communication: national conference of communication studies 2007, (pp. 22-27). Vaasa: University of Vaasa.
23. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5uTwWAZZl)
24. Kuhlthau, C. (1993). A principle of uncertainty for information seeking. Journal of Documentation, 49(4), 339-55.
25. Li, Y. (2004). Task type and a faceted classification of tasks. Proceedings of the 67th ASIS&T annual meeting, 41
26. Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications
27. Line, M.B. (1969). Information requirements in the social sciences: some preliminary considerations. Journal of Librarianship, 1(1), 1-19.
28. Marchionini, G. (2004). From information retrieval to information interaction. In G. Goos, J. Hartmanis & J. van Leeuwen, (Eds.). Advances in information retrieval. Proceedings of the 26th European Conference on IR Research, ECIR 2004, Sunderland, UK, April 5-7, 2004. (pp. 1-11). Berlin: Springer. (Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 2997, pp. 1-11)
29. Morville, P. (2005). Ambient findability. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly.
30. Nicholas, D. & Martin, H. (1997). Assessing information needs: a case study of journalists. Aslib Proceedings, 49(2), 43-52.
31. Pharo, N. (1999). Web information search strategies: a model for classifying web interaction. In T. Aparac, T. Saracevic, P. Ingwersen & P. Vakkari, (Eds.). Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the Conceptions of the Library and Information Science, (pp. 207-218). Zagreb: Zavod za informacijske studije Odsjeka za informacijske znanosti
32. Prieto-Díaz, R. (1991). Implementing faceted classification for software reuse. Communications of the ACM, 34(5), 88-97.
33. Ranganathan, S. R. (1963). Colon classification: basic classification. (6th ed.). Bombay: Asia Publishing.
34. Ryan, G. W. & Bernard, H. R. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), (pp. 769-802). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Spink, A. & Cole, C. (2006). Human information behavior: integrating diverse approaches and information use. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(1), 25-35.
36. Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Toms, E. G. (2002). Information interaction: providing a framework for information architecture. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(10), 855-862.
38. Trace, C. B. (2007). Information creation and the notion of membership. Journal of Documentation, 63(1), 142-164.
39. Widén-Wulff, G. (2007). Challenges of knowledge sharing in practice: a social approach. Oxford: Chandos.
40. Wilson, M. L., Schraefel, M. & White, R. W. (2009). Evaluating advanced search interfaces using established information-seeking models. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1407-1422.
41. Wilson, M. L. & Schraefel, M. C. (2007). Bridging the gap: using IR models for evaluating exploratory search interfaces. In SIGCHI 2007 Workshop on Exploratory Search and HCI. Retrieved 6 July, 2010 from http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/13135/
42. Wilson, T.D. (1981). On user studies and information needs. Journal of Documentation, 37(1), 3-15.
43. Wilson, T.D. (2000). Human information behavior. Informing Science, 3(2), 49-55.
44. Yuan, X. & Belkin, N. J. (2007). Supporting multiple information-seeking strategies in a single system framework. In SIGIR '07: Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, (pp. 247-254). New York, NY: ACM Press.