Dermatological feasibility of multimodal facial color imaging modality for cross-evaluation of facial actinic keratosis

Skin Research and Technology

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 4-10

  Bae, Youngwoo ^a   Son, Taeyoon ^a   Stuart Nelson, J ^b   Kim, Jae Hong ^c   Choi, Eung Ho ^a,c   Jung, Byungjo ^a  

^a Yonsei University Wonju   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Actinic keratosis; Cross evaluation; DermaVision PRO; Multimodal imaging

Indexed keywords

ACTINIC KERATOSIS; CLINICAL USE; CROSS POLARIZATIONS; CROSS-EVALUATION; DATABASE MANAGEMENT; DERMAVISION-PRO; DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION; DIGITAL COLOR IMAGES; FACIAL COLOR; FACIAL SKIN; FLUORESCENT COLORS; IMAGE ANALYSIS METHOD; IMAGING MODALITY; IMAGING MODES; MULTI-MODAL; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; OBJECTIVE EVALUATION; PATIENT INFORMATION; PRESCREENING; SKIN CANCERS; SKIN LESION;

COLOR; COLOR IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE ANALYSIS;

DERMATOLOGY;

ACTINIC KERATOSIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIGITAL IMAGING; EVALUATION; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; MALE; MULTIMODAL FACIAL COLOR IMAGING MODALITY; SKIN CANCER;

COLORIMETRY; DERMOSCOPY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FACIAL DERMATOSES; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KERATOSIS, ACTINIC; SOFTWARE;

EID: 78651444439     PISSN: 0909752X     EISSN: 16000846     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2010.00464.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Fullerton A, Fischer T, Lahti A et al. Guidelines for measurement of skin colour and erythema. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1996; 35: 1-10.
2. Jung B, Choi B, Shin Y et al. Determination of optimal view angles for quantitative facial image analysis. J Biomed Opt 2005; 10: 024002-1-024002-7.
3. Jung B, Kim CS, Choi B et al. Use of erythema index imaging for systematic analysis of port wine stain skin response to laser therapy. Lasers Surg Med 2005; 37: 186-191.
4. Wallace VP, Crawford DC, Mortimer PS et al. Spectrophotometric assessment of pigmented skin lesions: methods and feature selection for evaluation of diagnostic performance. Phys Med Biol 2000; 45: 735-751.
5. Marghoob AA, Swindle LD, Moricz CZ et al. Instruments and new technologies for the in vivo diagnosis of melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 49: 777-797; quiz 798-9.
6. Bae Y, Nelson JS, Jung B. Multimodal facial color imaging modality for objective analysis of skin lesions. J Biomed Opt 2008; 13: 064007-1-064007-8.
7. Yong-Gee SA, Kurwa HA, Barlow RJ. Objective assessment of port-wine stains following treatment with the 585 nm pulsed dye laser. Australas J Dermatol 2001; 42: 243-246.
8. Kang H, Jung B, Nelson JS. Polarization color imaging system for on-line quantitative evaluation of facial skin lesions. Dermatol Surg 2007; 33: 1350-1356.
9. Muccini JA, Kollias N, Phillips SB et al. Polarized light photography in the evaluation of photoaging. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995; 33: 765-769.
10. Han B, Jung B, Nelson JS et al. Analysis of facial sebum distribution using a digital fluorescent imaging system. J Biomed Opt 2007; 12: 014006-1-014006-6.
11. Jacques SL, Ramella-Roman JC, Lee K. Imaging skin pathology with polarized light. J Biomed Opt 2002; 7: 329-340.
12. Jacques SL, Roman JR, Lee K. Imaging superficial tissues with polarized light. Lasers Surg Med 2000; 26: 119-129.
13. Roewert-Huber J, Stockfleth E, Kerl H. Pathology and pathobiology of actinic (solar) keratosis - an update. Br J Dermatol 2007; 157 (Suppl.): 218-220.
14. Schwartz RA, Bridges TM, Butani AK et al. Actinic keratosis: an occupational and environmental disorder. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2008; 22: 606-615.
15. Horn M, Gerger A, Ahlgrimm-Siess V et al. Discrimination of actinic keratoses from normal skin with reflectance mode confocal microscopy. Dermatol Surg 2008; 34: 620-625.
16. Peris K, Micantonio T, Piccolo D et al. Dermoscopic features of actinic keratosis. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2007; 5: 970-976.
17. Varani J, Hattori Y, Chi Y et al. Collagenolytic and gelatinolytic matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in basal cell carcinoma of skin: comparison with normal skin. Br J Cancer 2000; 82: 657-665.
18. Asawanonda P, Taylor CR. Wood's light in dermatology. Int J Dermatol 1999; 38: 801-807.
19. Wollina U, Nelskamp C, Scheibe A et al. Fluorescence-remission sensoring of skin tumours: preliminary results. Skin Res Technol 2007; 13: 463-471.
20. Ramanujam N. Fluorescence spectroscopy of neoplastic and non-neoplastic tissues. Neoplasia 2000; 2: 89-117.
21. Diagaradjane P, Yaseen MA, Yu J, Wong MS, Anvari B. Autofluorescence characterization for the early diagnosis of neoplastic changes in DMBA/TPA-induced mouse skin carcinogenesis. Lasers Surg Med 2005; 37: 382-395.
22. Mayevsky A, Chance B. Intracellular oxidation-reduction state measured in situ by a multichannel fiber-optic surface fluorometer. Science 1982; 217: 537-540.
23. Niamtu J III. Digitally processed ultraviolet images: a convenient, affordable, reproducible means of illustrating ultraviolet clinical examination. Dermatol Surg 2001; 27: 1039-1042.