Habitat associations and survey effort for shrubland birds in an urban pine barrens preserve

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 99, Issue 3-4, 2011, Pages 218-225

  Bried, Jason T ^a   Langwig, Kate E ^b,d   Dewan, Amielle A ^c   Gifford, Neil A ^a  

^a Albany Pine Bush Preserve Commission   (United States)

^b NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION   (United States)

^c Defenders of Wildlife   (United States)

^d USA   (United States)

Author keywords

Detection probability; Habitat management; Indicator; Occupancy; Sampling design; Urban ecosystem

Indexed keywords

BIRDS; ECOSYSTEMS; INDICATORS (INSTRUMENTS);

DETECTION PROBABILITIES; HABITAT MANAGEMENT; OCCUPANCY; SAMPLING DESIGN; URBAN ECOSYSTEM;

SURVEYS;

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; BIRD; CONIFEROUS TREE; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; HABITAT MANAGEMENT; HABITAT QUALITY; OCCUPATION; POPULATION DECLINE; PROBABILITY; SAMPLING; SHRUBLAND; SUCCESSION; URBAN ECOSYSTEM;

UNITED STATES;

AVES;

EID: 78651443045     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Adams C.E., Lindsey K.J. Urban Wildlife Management 2009, CRC Press, Georgia. 2nd ed.
2. Askins R.A. Restoring North America's Birds: Lessons from Landscape Ecology 2000, Yale University Press, Connecticut.
3. Askins R.A., Zuckerberg B., Novak L. Do the size and landscape context of forest openings influence the abundance and breeding success of shrubland songbirds in southern New England?. For. Ecol. Manage. 2007, 250:137-147.
4. Bailey L.L., Hines J.E., Nichols J.D., MacKenzie D.I. Sampling design tradeoffs in occupancy studies with imperfect detection: examples and software. Ecol. Appl. 2007, 17:281-290.
5. Bailey L.L., Reid J.A., Forsman E.D., Nichols J.D. Modelling co-occurrence of northern spotted and barred owls: accounting for detection probability differences. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142:2983-2989.
6. Barnes, J.K., 2003. Natural History of the Albany Pine Bush: Albany and Schenectady Counties, New York. NYS Museum Bulletin #502, New York.
7. Beachy B.L., Robinson G.R. Divergence in avian communities following woody plant invasions in a pine barrens ecosystem. Nat. Area J. 2008, 28:395-403.
8. Betts M.G., Rodenhouse N.L., Sillett T.S., Doran P.J., Holmes R.T. Dynamic occupancy models reveal within-breeding season movement up a habitat quality gradient by a migratory songbird. Ecography 2008, 31:592-600.
9. Bried J.T., Gifford N.A. Mowing and herbicide of scrub oaks in pine barrens: baseline data (New York). Ecol. Restor. 2010, 28:245-248.
10. Burhans D.E., Thompson F.R. Songbird abundance and parasitism differ between urban and rural shrublands. Ecol. Appl. 2006, 16:394-405.
11. Burnham K.P., Anderson D.R. Model Selection and Multi-model Inference: A Practical Information-theoretic Approach 2002, Springer-Verlag, New York.
12. Chandler R.B., King D.I., Chandler C.C. Effects of management regime on the abundance and nest survival of shrubland birds in wildlife openings in northern New England, USA. For. Ecol. Manage. 2009, 258:1669-1676.
13. Chace J.F., Walsh J.J. Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landscape Urban Plan. 2006, 74:46-69.
14. Chace J.F., Faccio S.D., Chacko A. Canada warbler habitat use of northern hardwoods in Vermont. Northeast. Nat. 2009, 16:491-500.
15. Confer J., Pascoe S.M. Avian communities on utility rights-of-way and other managed shrublands in the northeastern United States. For. Ecol. Manage. 2003, 185:193-205.
16. Croci S., Butet A., Clergeau P. Does urbanization filter birds on the basis of their biological traits?. Condor 2008, 110:223-240.
17. Darrah A.J., Krementz D.G. Distribution and habitat use of king rails in the Illinois and Upper Mississippi river valleys. J. Wildlife Manage. 2009, 73:1380-1386.
18. DeGraaf R.M., Yamasaki M. New England Wildlife: Habitat, Natural History, and Distribution 2001, University Press of New England, New Hampshire.
19. Dettmers R. Status and conservation of shrubland birds in the northeastern US. For. Ecol. Manage. 2003, 185:81-93.
20. DeWan A.A., Sullivan P.J., Lembo A.J., Smith C.R., Maerz J.C., Lassoie J.P., Richmond M.E. Using occupancy models of forest breeding birds to prioritize conservation planning. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142:982-991.
21. Field S.A., Tyre A.J., Possingham H.P. Optimizing allocation of monitoring effort under economic and observational constraints. J. Wildlife Manage. 2005, 69:473-482.
22. Finton, A.D., 1998. Succession and plant community development in pitch pine-scrub oak barrens of the glaciated Northeast United States. MS Dissertation. Univ. Mass., Amherst.
23. George T.L., Zack S. Spatial and temporal considerations in restoring habitat for wildlife. Restor. Ecol. 2001, 9:272-279.
24. Gifford N.A., Deppen J.M., Bried J.T. Importance of an urban pine barrens for the conservation of early-successional shrubland birds. Landscape Urban Plan. 2010, 94:54-62.
25. Gonzalo-Turpin H., Sirami C., Brotons L., Gonzalo L., Martin J.L. Teasing out biological effects and sampling artifacts when using occupancy rate in monitoring programs. J. Field Ornithol. 2008, 79:159-169.
26. Grand J., Cushman S.A. A multi-scale analysis of species-environment relationships: breeding birds in a pitch pine-scrub oak (Pinus rigida-Quercus ilicifolia) community. Biol. Conserv. 2003, 112:307-317.
27. Gu W., Swihart R.K. Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife-habitat models. Biol. Conserv. 2004, 116:195-203.
28. Halme P., Mönkkönen M., Kotiaho J.S., Ylisirniö A.-L., Markkanen A. Quantifying the indicator power of an indicator species. Conserv. Biol. 2009, 23:1008-1016.
29. Hennemen C., Andersen D.E. Occupancy models of nesting-season habitat associations of red-shouldered hawks in central Minnesota. J. Wildlife Manage. 2009, 73:1316-1324.
30. Jackson J.T., Weckerly F.W., Swannack T.M., Forstner M.R.J. Inferring absence of Houston toads given imperfect detection probabilities. J. Wildlife Manage. 2006, 70:1461-1463.
31. Kays R.W., DeWan A.A. Ecological impact of inside/outside house cats around a suburban nature preserve. Anim. Conserv. 2004, 7:1-11.
32. King D.I., Chandler R.B., Schlossberg S., Chandler C.C. Habitat use and nest success of scrub-shrub birds in wildlife and silvicultural openings in western Massachusetts, USA. For. Ecol. Manage. 2009, 257:421-426.
33. King D.I., Chandler R.B., Collins J.M., Peterson W.R., Lautzenheiser T.E. Effects of width, edge and habitat on the abundance and nesting success of scrub-shrub birds in powerline corridors. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142:2672-2680.
34. Krejca J.K., Weckerly B. Detection probabilities of karst invertebrates. Proceedings of the 18th National Cave & Karst Management Symposium 2007, 283-289. W.R. Elliott (Ed.).
35. Kroll A.J., Duke S.D., Runde D.E., Arnett E.B., Austin K.A. Modeling habitat occupancy of orange-crowned warblers in managed forests of Oregon and Washington, USA. J. Wildlife Manage. 2007, 71:1089-1097.
36. Lawler J.J., Edwards T.C. A variance-decomposition approach to investigating multiscale habitat associations. Condor 2006, 108:47-58.
37. Leavelle, K.M., 2008. Occupancy and associated habitat characteristics, fruit preferences, and nesting behaviors of the blue-headed quail-dove (Starnoenas cyanocephala) of Cuba. MS Dissertation. Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln.
38. Lehnen S.E., Rodewald A.D. Investigating area-sensitivity in shrubland birds: responses to patch size in a forested landscape. For. Ecol. Manage. 2009, 257:2308-2316.
39. MacKenzie D.I., Nichols J.D., Lachman G.B., Droege S., Royle J.A., Langtimm C.A. Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 2002, 83:2248-2255.
40. MacKenzie D.I., Bailey L.L. Assessing the fit of site-occupancy models. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 2004, 9:300-318.
41. MacKenzie D.I., Royle J.A. Designing occupancy studies: general advice and allocating survey effort. J. Appl. Ecol. 2005, 42:1105-1114.
42. MacKenzie D.I., Nichols J.D., Royle J.A., Pollock K.H., Bailey L.L., Hines J.E. Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence 2006, Elsevier, California.
43. Malcolm G.M., Bush D.S., Rice S.K. Soil nitrogen conditions approach preinvasion levels following restoration of nitrogen-fixing black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) stands in a pine-oak ecosystem. Restor. Ecol. 2008, 16:70-78.
44. Marzluff J.M., Ewing K. Restoration of fragmented landscapes for the conservation of birds: a general framework and specific recommendations for urbanizing landscapes. Restor. Ecol. 2001, 9:280-292.
45. Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World. 2001, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Massachusetts. J.M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, R. Donnelly (Eds.).
46. Milne B.T. Upland vegetational gradients and post-fire succession in the Albany Pine Bush, New York. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 1985, 112:21-34.
47. Mitchell B.R., Donovan T. Mob mentality: effect of a mobbing playback on avian detection probabilities during point count surveys. Open Ornithol. J. 2008, 1:8-19.
48. Noss R.F., LaRoe E.T., Scott J.M. Endangered ecosystems of the United States: a preliminary assessment of loss and degradation. Biol. Rep. U. S. Fish Wildl. Serv. 1995, 28.
49. Pagano A.M., Arnold T.W. Estimating detection probabilities of waterfowl broods from ground-based surveys. J. Wildlife Manage. 2009, 73:686-694.
50. Pellet J., Schmidt B.R. Monitoring distributions using call surveys: estimating site occupancy, detection probabilities and inferring absence. Biol. Conserv. 2005, 123:27-35.
51. Ralph, C.J., Martin, T.E., Geupel, G.R., DeSante, D.F., Pyle, P., 1993. Handbook of Field Methods for Monitoring Landbirds. USDA For. Serv., PSW-GTR-144.
52. Richmond O.M., Tecklin J., Beissinger S.R. Distribution of California Black Rails in the Sierra Nevada foothills. J. Field Ornithol. 2008, 79:381-390.
53. Rodewald A.D., Vitz A.C. Edge- and area-sensitivity of shrubland birds. J. Wildlife Manage. 2005, 69:681-688.
54. Rodewald A.D. Urban-associated habitat alteration promotes brood parasitism of Acadian Flycatchers. J. Field Ornithol. 2009, 80:234-241.
55. Royle J.A., Nichols J.D. Estimating abundance from repeated presence-absence data or point counts. Ecology 2003, 84:777-790.
56. Royle J.A. N-mixture models for estimating population size from spatially replicated point counts. Biometrics 2004, 60:108-115.
57. Ruiz-Gutiérrez V., Zipkin E.F., Dhondt A.A. Occupancy dynamics in a tropical bird community: unexpectedly high forest use by birds classified as non-forest species. J. Appl. Ecol. 2010, 47:621-630.
58. Schlesinger M.D., Manley P.N., Holyoak M. Distinguishing stressors acting on land bird communities in an urbanizing environment. Ecology 2008, 89:2302-2314.
59. Schlossberg S., King D.I. Are shrubland birds edge specialists?. Ecol. Appl. 2008, 18:1325-1330.
60. Schlossberg S., King D.I., Chandler R.B., Mazzei B.A. Regional synthesis of habitat relationships in shrubland birds. J. Wildlife Manage. 2010, 74:1513-1522.
61. Selmi S., Boulinier T. Does time of season influence bird species number determined from point-count data? A capture-recapture approach. J. Field Ornithol. 2003, 74:349-356.
62. Skirven A.A. Effect of time of day and time of season on the number of observations and density estimates of breeding birds. Auk 1981, 124:986-999.
63. Sorace A., Gustin M. Bird species of conservation concern along urban gradients in Italy. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19:205-221.
64. Tyre A.J., Tenhumberg B., Field S.A., Niejalke D., Parris K., Possingham H.P. Improving precision and reducing bias in biological surveys: estimating false-negative error rates. Ecol. Appl. 2003, 13:1790-1801.
65. Watson C.A., Weckerly F.W., Hatfield J.S., Farquhar C.C., Williamson P.S. Presence-nonpresence surveys of golden-cheeked warblers: detection, occupancy and survey effort. Anim. Conserv. 2008, 11:484-492.