Testing three health impact assessment tools in planning: A process evaluation

Environmental Impact Assessment Review

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 144-153

  Slotterback, Carissa Schively ^a   Forsyth, Ann ^b   Krizek, Kevin J ^c   Johnson, Amanda ^d   Pennucci, Aly ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b Cornell University ^*  (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^e City of Minneapolis Public Works Dep   (United States)

Author keywords

Development; Health; HIA; Urban planning

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENT; HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT; HEALTH ISSUES; HIA; MINNESOTA; PROCESS EVALUATION;

PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RATING; URBAN PLANNING;

HEALTH;

HEALTH IMPACT; HEALTH MONITORING; PUBLIC HEALTH; STAKEHOLDER; URBAN PLANNING;

MINNESOTA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 78651435896     PISSN: 01959255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Association of Public Health Observatories. HIA Gateway. ; 2010. http://www.apho.org.uk/default.aspx?QN=P_HIA.
2. Bass R.E., Herson A.I., Bogdan K.M. The NEPA book: a step-by step guide on how to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act 2001, Solano Press Books, Point Arena, CA. 2nd edition.
3. Beatley T., Brower D.J. Representation in comprehensive planning: an analysis of the Austin plan process. J Am Plan Assoc 1994, 60(2):185-197.
4. Bekker M.P.M., Putters K., Van der Grinten T.E.D. Evaluating the impact of HIA on urban reconstruction decision-making. Who manages whose risks?. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2005, 25(7-8):758-771.
5. Berke P.R., Conroy M.M. Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans. J Am Plan Assoc 2000, 66(1):21-33.
6. Bhatia R., Wernham A. Integrating human health into environmental impact assessment: an unrealized opportunity for environmental health and justice. Environ Health Perspect 2008, 116(8):991-1000. http://dx.doi.org/.
7. Brody S.D. Measuring the effects of stakeholder participation on the quality of local plans based on the principles of collaborative ecosystem management. J Plan Educ Res 2003, 22(4):407-419.
8. Burby R. Making plans that matter: citizen involvement and government action. J Am Plan Assoc 2003, 69(1):33-49.
9. City of Bloomington, Minnesota. Alternative Transportation Plan. ; 2008. http://www.ci.bloomington.mn.us/cityhall/dept/commdev/planning/longrang/alttranplan/draft.htm.
10. City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota. Pedestrian and Bicycle Mobility Plan. ; 2008. http://www.ci.columbia-heights.mn.us/departments/pdf/Ped%20and%20Bike%20Mobility%20Plan.pdf.
11. Active community planning: site planning guide 2007, City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota.
12. City of Ramsey, Minnesota. Health Impact Assessment. ; 2008. http://www.designforhealth.net/pdfs/cases/Ramsey_ThresholdAnalysis.pdf.
13. Dannenberg A.L., Bhatia R., Cole B.L., Dora C., Fielding J., McClymont-Peace D., et al. Growing the field of health impact assessment in the United States: an agenda for research and practice. Am J Public Health 2006, 96(2):262-270.
14. Dannenberg A.L., Bhatia R., Cole B.L., Heaton S.K., Feldman J.D., Rutt C.D. Use of health impact assessment in the United States: 27 case studies, 1999-2007. Am J Prev Med 2008, 34(3):241-256.
15. Davies, K, Sadler, B. Environmental assessment and human health: perspectives, approaches and future directions. Health Canada. ; 1997. http://dsp-psd.communication.gc.ca/Collection/H46-3-7-1997E.pdf.
16. Design for Health. Health Impact Assessment Level 1: Preliminary Checklist. Version 2.1. ; 2007a. http://www.designforhealth.net/techassistance/hiaprimchecklist.html.
17. Design for Health. Health Impact Assessment Level 2: Rapid Health Assessment Toolkit. ; 2007b. http://www.designforhealth.net/techassistance/hiarapidassessment.html.
18. Design for Health. Health Impact Assessment Level 3: Threshold Analysis. ; 2007c. http://www.designforhealth.net/techassistance/hiathresholdanalysis.html.
19. Design for Health. Comprehensive Plan Review Checklist. ; 2007d. http://www.designforhealth.net/pdfs/resources/checklists/BCBS_CompChecklist_092607WithIntro.pdf.
20. Deyle R.E., Slotterback C.S. Group learning in participatory planning processes: an exploratory quasi-experimental analysis of local mitigation planning in Florida. J Plan Educ Res 2009, 29(1):23-38.
21. Deyle R.E., Smith R.A. Local government compliance with state planning mandates: the effects of state implementation in Florida. J Am Plan Assoc 1998, 64(4):457-469.
22. Dixon J.E., Erickson N.J., Crawford J.L., Berke P. Planning under a co-operative mandate: new plans for New Zealand. J Environ Plan Manag 1997, 40(5):603-614.
23. Edwards M., Haines A. Evaluating smart growth: implications for small communities. J Plan Educ Res 2007, 27(1):49-64.
24. Finkelstein M.M., Jerrett M., Sears M.R. Environmental inequality and circulatory disease mortality gradients. J Epidemiol Commun Health 2005, 59(6):481-487.
25. Forester J. Planning in the face of power 1989, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
26. Forsyth A., Slotterback C.S., Krizek K.J. Health impact assessment in planning: development of the design for health HIA tools. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2010, 30(1):42-51.
27. Forsyth A., Slotterback C.S., Krizek K.J. Health impact assessment for planners: What tools are useful?. J of Plan. Lit. 2010, 24(3):231-245.
28. Godschalk D.R., Brody S., Burby R. Public participation in natural hazard mitigation policy formation: challenges for comprehensive planning. J Environ Plan Manag 2003, 46(5):733-754.
29. Healey P. Collaborative planning: shaping places in fragmented societies 1997, University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, BC.
30. Helling A. Collaborative visioning: proceed with caution! results from evaluating Atlanta's Vision 2020 project. J. Am Plan Assoc 1998, 64(3):335-349.
31. Innes J.E. Group processes and the social construction of growth management: Florida, Vermont, and New Jersey. J Am Plan Assoc 1992, 4:440-454.
32. Innes J.E. Planning through consensus-building: a new view of the comprehensive planning ideal. J Am Plan Assoc 1996, 62(4):461-472.
33. Ison E. Rapid appraisal tool for health impact assessment: a task-based approach 2002, Institute of Health Sciences, Oxford, Eleventh iteration.
34. Jain R.K., Urban L.V., Stacey G.S., Balbach H.E. Environmental assessment 2001, McGraw-Hill, New York. 2nd ed.
35. Kemm J.R. Can health impact assessment fulfill the expectations it raises?. J Public Health 2000, 114:431-433.
36. Kotter J. Leading change 1996, Harvard business School Press, Boston, MA.
37. Krieger N., Northridge M., Gruskin S., Quinn M., Kriebel D., Davey Smith G., et al. Assessing health impact assessment: multidisciplinary and international perspectives. J Epidemiol Commun Health 2003, 57:659-662.
38. Lin S., Munsie J.P., Hwang S.A., Fitzergerald E., Cayo M. Childhood asthma hospitalization and residential exposure to state route traffic. J Environ Res 2002, 88(2):73-81.
39. Mandarano L.A. Evaluating collaborative environmental planning outputs and outcomes: restoring and protecting habitat in the New York New Jersey Harbor Estuary Program. J Environ Plan Manag 2008, 27(4):456-468.
40. Margerum R.D. Evaluating collaborative planning: implications from an empirical analysis of growth management. J Am Plan Assoc 2002, 68(2):179-193.
41. Mindell J., Joffe M. Health impact assessment in relation to other forms of impact assessment. J Public Health Med 2003, 25(2):107-113.
42. Norton R.K. More and better local planning: state-mandated local planning in coastal North Carolina. J Am Plan Assoc 2005, 71(1):55-71.
43. Ozawa C.P., Seltzer E.P. Taking our bearings: mapping a relationship among planning, practice, theory, and education. J Plan Educ Res 1999, 18(3):257-266.
44. Parry J.M., Kemm J.R. Criteria for use in the evaluation of health impact assessments. On behalf of all participants of the evaluation of health impact assessment workshop. J Public Health 2005, 119(12):1122-1129.
45. Parry J., Stevens A. Prospective health impact assessment: pitfalls, problems, and possible ways forward. Br Med J 2001, 323(7322):1177-1182.
46. Petts J. Evaluating the effectiveness of deliberative processes: waste management case studies. J Environ Plan Manag 2001, 44(2):207-226.
47. Quigley R.J., Taylor L.C. Evaluation as a key part of health impact assessment: the English experience. Bull World Health Org 2003, 81:415-419.
48. Quigley R.J., Taylor L.C. Evaluating health impact assessment. J Public Health 2004, 118(8):544-552.
49. Schively C. A quantitative analysis of consensus building in local environmental review. J Plan Educ Res 2007, 27(1):82-98.
50. Scott-Samuel A., Birley M., Ardern K. The Merseyside guidelines for health impact assessment 2001, International Health Impact Assessment Consortium, Liverpool. Second Edition.
51. Van Vliet P., Knape M., de Hartog J., Janssen N.A.H., Harssema H., Brunekeef B. Motor vehicle exhaust and chronic respiratory symptoms in children living near freeways. J Environ Res 1997, 74(2):122-132.
52. World Health Organization (WHO). Health Impact Assessment: Main Concepts and Suggested Approach: The Gothenburg Consensus Paper, Brussels: WHO Regional Office for Europe. 1999. http://www.who.dk/document/PAE/Gothenburgpaper.pdf.