Neural correlates of auditory streaming of harmonic complex sounds with different phase relations in the songbird forebrain

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 105, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 188-199

  Itatani, Naoya ^a   Klump, Georg M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATING PHASE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY RESPONSE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; COSINE PHASE; FEMALE; FILTER; FOREBRAIN; MALE; NERVE CELL; NERVE STIMULATION; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; RANDOM PHASE; RECORDING; SONGBIRD; TEMPORAL CORTEX;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COCHLEAR NERVE; CUES; FEMALE; MALE; NEURONS; PROSENCEPHALON; STARLINGS; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

EID: 78651426998     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00496.2010     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bee MA, Buschermöhle M, Klump GM. Detecting modulated signals in modulated noise. II. Neural thresholds in the songbird forebrain. Eur J Neurosci 26: 1979-1994, 2007.
2. Bee MA, Klump GM. Primitive auditory stream segregation: a neurophysiological study in the songbird forebrain. J Neurophysiol 92: 1088-1104, 2004.
3. Bee MA, Klump GM. Auditory stream segregation in the songbird forebrain: effects of time intervals on responses to interleaved tone sequences. Brain Behav Evol 66: 197-214, 2005.
4. Bregman AS. Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1990.
5. Buschermöhle M, Verhey JL, Feudel U, Freund JA. The role of the auditory periphery in comodulation detection difference and comodulation masking release. Biol Cybern 97: 397-411, 2007.
6. Cariani PA, Delgutte B. Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. I. Pitch and pitch salience. J Neurophysiol 76: 1698-1716, 1996a.
7. Cariani PA, Delgutte B. Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. II. Pitch shift, pitch ambiguity, phase invariance, pitch circularity, rate pitch, and the dominance region for pitch. J Neurophysiol 76: 1717-1734, 1996b.
8. Cusack R, Roberts B. Effects of similarity in bandwidth on the auditory sequential streaming of two-tone complexes. Perception 28: 1281-1289, 1999.
9. Elhilali M, Ma L, Micheyl C, Oxenham AJ, Shamma SA. Temporal coherence in the perceptual organization and cortical representation of auditory scenes. Neuron 61: 1-13, 2009.
10. Fishman YI, Arezzo JC, Steinschneider M. Auditory stream segregation in monkey auditory cortex: effects of frequency separation, presentation rate, and tone duration. J Acoust Soc Am 116: 1656-1670, 2004.
11. Fishman YI, Reser DH, Arezzo JC, Steinschneider M. Neural correlates of auditory stream segregation in primary auditory cortex of the awake monkey. Hear Res 151: 167-187, 2001.
12. Gleich O, Narins PM. The phase response of primary auditory afferents in a songbird (Sturnus vulgaris L.). Hear Res 32: 81-91, 1988.
13. Greenhouse SW, Geisser S. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 24: 95-112, 1959.
14. Grimault N, Bacon SP, Micheyl C. Auditory stream segregation on the basis of amplitude-modulation rate. J Acoust Soc Am 111: 1340-1348, 2002.
15. Gutschalk A, Oxenham AJ, Micheyl C, Wilson EC, Melcher JR. Human cortical activity during streaming without spectral cues suggests a general neural substrate for auditory stream segregation. J Neurosci 27: 13074-13081, 2007.
16. Hartmann WM, Johnson D. Stream segregation and peripheral channeling. Music Percept 9: 155-184, 1991.
17. Hofer SB, Klump GM. Within- and across-channel processing in auditory masking: a physiological study in the songbird forebrain. J Neurosci 23: 5732-5739, 2003.
18. Itatani N, Klump GM. Auditory streaming of amplitude-modulated sounds in the songbird forebrain. J Neurophysiol 101: 3212-3225, 2009.
19. Kettembeil S, Manley GA, Siegl E. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and their anaesthesia sensitivity in the European starling and the chicken. Hear Res 86: 47-62, 1995.
20. Knipschild M, Dörrscheidt GJ, Rübsamen R. Setting complex tasks to single units in the avian auditory forebrain. I. Processing of complex artificial stimuli. Hear Res 57: 216-230, 1992.
21. MacDougall-Shackleton SA, Hulse SH, Gentner TQ, White W. Auditory scene analysis by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris): perceptual segregation of tone sequences. J Acoust Soc Am 103: 3581-3587, 1998.
22. Micheyl C, Tian B, Carlyon RP, Rauschecker JP. Perceptual organization of tone sequences in the auditory cortex of awake macaques. Neuron 48: 139-148, 2005.
23. Moore BC, Gockel H. Factors influencing stream segregation. Acta Acustica 3: 320-333, 2002.
24. Palmer AR, Winter IM. Cochlear nerve and cochlear nucleus responses to the fundamental frequency of voiced speech sounds and harmonic complex tones. In: Auditory Physiology and Perception, edited by Horner K. Oxford: Pergamon, 1992, p. 231-240.
25. Pressnitzer D, Sayles M, Micheyl C, Winter IM. Perceptual organization of sound begins in the auditory periphery. Curr Biol 18: 1124-1128, 2008.
26. Roberts B, Glasberg BR, Moore BC. 2002. Primitive stream segregation of tone sequences without differences in fundamental frequency or passband. J Acoust Soc Am 112: 2074-2085, 2002.
27. Rose MM, Moore BC. Effects of frequency and level on auditory stream segregation. J Acoust Soc Am 108: 1209-1214, 2000.
28. Shackleton TM, Carlyon RP. The role of resolved and unresolved harmonics in pitch perception and frequency modulation discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am 95: 3529-3540, 1994.
29. Stainsby TH, Moore BC, Medland PJ, Glasberg BR. Sequential streaming and effective level differences due to phase-spectrum manipulations. J Acoust Soc Am 115: 1665-1673, 2004.
30. van Noorden LPAS. Temporal Coherence in the Perception of Tone Sequences (PhD dissertation). The Netherlands: IPO, 1975.
31. Vliegen J, Oxenham AJ. Sequential stream segregation in the absence of spectral cues. J Acoust Soc Am 105: 339-346, 1999.