Dynamic spectral imaging colposcopy: Higher sensitivity for detection of premalignant cervical lesions

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 118, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 309-318

  Louwers, J A ^a   Zaal, A ^a,b   Kocken, M ^a,c   Ter Harmsel, W A ^d   Graziosi, G C M ^e   Spruijt, J W M ^a   Berkhof, J ^a   Balas, C ^f   Papagiannakis, E ^g   Snijders, P J F ^a   Meijer, C J L M ^a   Van Kemenade, F J ^a   Verheijen, R H M ^a,b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d REINIER DE GRAAF HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^e ST ANTONIUS HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^f TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF CRETE   (Greece)

^g Alba Campus   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cervical Intraepithelial neoplasia; colposcopy; sensitivity; specificity; spectrometry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLPOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMIC SPECTRAL IMAGING COLPOSCOPY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PREMALIGNANT CERVICAL LESION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; UTERINE CERVIX DISEASE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; COLPOSCOPY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78651420381     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02806.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bekkers RL, van de Nieuwenhof HP, Neesham DE, Hendriks JH, Tan J, Quinn MA,. Does experience in colposcopy improve identification of high grade abnormalities? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008; 141: 75-8.
2. Gage JC, Hanson VW, Abbey K, Dippery S, Gardner S, Kubota J, et al. Number of cervical biopsies and sensitivity of colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 264-72.
3. Ferris DG, Litaker MS,. Prediction of cervical histologic results using an abbreviated Reid Colposcopic Index during ALTS. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 704-10.
4. Massad LS, Collins YC,. Strength of correlations between colposcopic impression and biopsy histology. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 89: 424-8.
5. Mitchell MF, Schottenfeld D, Tortolero-Luna G, Cantor SB, Richards-Kortum R,. Colposcopy for the diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91: 626-31. (Pubitemid 28153058)
6. Wu S, Meng L, Wang S, Ma D,. A comparison of four screening methods for cervical neoplasia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005; 91: 189-93.
7. Etherington IJ, Luesley DM, Shafi MI, Dunn J, Hiller L, Jordan JA,. Observer variability among colposcopists from the West Midlands region. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 1380-4.
8. Ferris DG, Litaker M,. Interobserver agreement for colposcopy quality control using digitized colposcopic images during the ALTS trial. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2005; 9: 29-35.
9. Hopman EH, Voorhorst FJ, Kenemans P, Meyer CJ, Helmerhorst TJ,. Observer agreement on interpreting colposcopic images of CIN. Gynecol Oncol 1995; 58: 206-9.
10. Pretorius RG, Zhang WH, Belinson JL, Huang MN, Wu LY, Zhang X, et al. Colposcopically directed biopsy, random cervical biopsy, and endocervical curettage in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II or worse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 430-4.
11. Stoler MH, Schiffman M,. Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations: realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study. JAMA 2001; 285: 1500-5.
12. Wentzensen N, Zuna RE, Sherman ME, Gold MA, Schiffman M, Dunn ST, et al. Accuracy of cervical specimens obtained for biomarker studies in women with CIN3. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 115: 493-6.
13. Balas C, Dimoka E, Orfanoudaki E, Koumandakis E,. In vivo assessment of acetic acid-cervical tissue interaction using quantitative imaging of back-scattered light: its potential use for the in vivo cervical cancer detection grading and mapping. SPIE-Opt Biop Microsc Tech 1998; 3568: 31-7.
14. Balas C,. A novel optical imaging method for the early detection, quantitative grading, and mapping of cancerous and precancerous lesions of cervix. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2001; 48: 96-104.
15. Balas CJ, Themelis GC, Prokopakis EP, Orfanudaki I, Koumantakis E, Helidonis ES,. In vivo detection and staging of epithelial dysplasias and malignancies based on the quantitative assessment of acetic acid-tissue interaction kinetics. J Photochem Photobiol B 1999; 53: 153-7.
16. Soutter WP, Diakomanolis E, Lyons D, Ghaem-Maghami S, Ajala T, Haidopoulos D, et al. Dynamic spectral imaging: improving colposcopy. Clin Cancer Res 2009; 15: 1814-20.
17. Li W, Venkataraman S, Gustafsson U, Oyama JC, Ferris DG, Lieberman RW,. Using acetowhite opacity index for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Biomed Opt 2009; 14: 014020.
18. Balas C, Papoutsoglou G, Potirakis A,. In vivo molecular imaging of cervical neoplasia using acetic acid as biomarker. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 2008; 14: 29-42.
19. Dutch national colposcopy guidelines. 2009 [www.nvog-documenten.nl/index. php?pagina=/richtlijn/pagina.php&fSelectTG-62=75&fSelectedSub= 62&fSelectedParent=75]. Last accessed 1 December.
20. Ferris DG, Litaker MS, Dickman ED, Allmond LM, Smith KM, Arrington TL,. Women's responses to cervical interrogation by fluorescent and reflective spectroscopy. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2003; 7: 299-303.
21. Ferris DG, Dickman ED, Litaker MS, Smith KM, Allmond LM, Arrington TL,. Patient acceptance of fluorescent and reflective spectroscopy as a replacement test for the pap smear. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2003; 7: 294-8.
22. Snijders PJF, van den Brule AJC, Jacobs MV, Pol RP, Meijer CJLM,. HPV DNA detection and typing in cervical scrapes. Methods Mol Med 2005; 119: 101-14.
23. van den Brule AJC, Pol R, Fransen-Daalmeijer N, Schouls LM, Meijer CJLM, Snijders PJF,. GP5+/6+ PCR followed by reverse line blot analysis enables rapid and high-throughput identification of human papillomavirus genotypes. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40: 779-87.
24. Park T,. Is the exact test better than the asymptotic test for testing marginal homogeneity in 2 à - 2 tables? Biom J 2002; 44: 571-83.
25. Jeronimo J, Massad LS, Schiffman M,. Visual appearance of the uterine cervix: correlation with human papillomavirus detection and type. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197: 47-8.