The behavioral neuroscience of anuran social signal processing

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 754-763

  Wilczynski, Walter ^a   Ryan, Michael J ^b  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN STEM; DECISION MAKING; DIENCEPHALON; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FOREBRAIN; FROG; HUMAN; MESENCEPHALON; NEUROBIOLOGY; NEUROMODULATION; NEUROSCIENCE; NEUROTRANSMISSION; NONHUMAN; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SENSORY SYSTEM ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL INTERACTION; TELENCEPHALON; TOAD;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; ANURA; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; MESENCEPHALON; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 78651418245     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2010.08.021     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. The Evolution of the Amphibian Auditory System 1988, Wiley, New York. B. Fritzsch, M.J. Ryan, W. Wilczynski, T.E. Hetherington, W. Walkowiak (Eds.).
2. Hearing and Sound Communication in Amphibians 2007, Springer-Verlag, New York. P.N. Narins, A.S. Feng, R.R. Fay, A.N. Popper (Eds.).
3. Anuran Communication 2001, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. M.J. Ryan (Ed.).
4. Wells K.D. The social behavior of anuran amphibians. Anim Behav 1977, 25:666-693.
5. Ryan M.J., Bernal X.E., Rand A.S. Female mate choice and the potential for ornament evolution in túngara frogs Physalaemus pustulosus. Curr Zool 2010, 56:343-357.
6. Ryan M.J., Rand A.S. Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution 1993, 47:647-657.
7. Byers B.E., Kroodsma D.E. Female mate choice and songbird song repertoires. Anim Behav 2009, 77:13-22.
8. Seehausen O., Terai Y., Magalhaes I.S., Carleton K.L., Mrosso H.D.J., Miyagi R., van der Sluijs I., Schneider M.V., Maan M.E., Tachida H., et al. Speciation through sensory drive in cichlid fish. Nature 2008, 455:U620-U623.
9. Capranica R.R. Vocal response of bullfrog to natural and synthetic mating calls. J Acoust Soc Am 1966, 40:1131-1139.
10. Frishkopf L.S., Capranica R.R., Goldstein M.H.J. Neural coding in the bullfrog's auditory system-a teleological approach. Proc IEEE 1968, 56:969-980.
11. Wilczynski W., Endepols H. Central auditory pathways in anuran amphibians: the anatomical basis of hearing and sound communication. Hearing and Sound Communication in Amphibians 2007, 221-249. Springer-Verlag. P.N. Narins, A.S. Feng, R.R. Fay, A.N. Popper (Eds.).
12. Walkowiak W., Luksch H. Sensory-motor interfacing in acoustic behavior of anurans. Am Zool 1994, 34:685-695.
13. Endepols H., Feng A.S., Gerhardt H.C., Schul J., Walkowiak W. Roles of the auditory midbrain and thalamus in selective phonotaxis in female gray treefrogs (Hyla versicolor). Behav Brain Res 2003, 145:63-77.
14. Endepols H., Walkowiak W. Integration of ascending and descending inputs in the auditory midbrain of anurans. J Comp Physiol A: Sens Neur Behav Physiol 2000, 186:1119-1133.
15. Strake J., Luksch H., Walkowiak W. Audio-motor interface in anurans. Eur J Morphol 1994, 32:122-126.
16. Rose G.J., Gooler D.M. Function of the amphibian central auditory system. Hearing and Sound Communication in Amphibians 2007, 250-290. Springer-Verlag. P.N. Narins, A.S. Feng, R.R. Fay, A.N. Popper (Eds.).
17. Feng A.S., Hall J.C., Gooler D.M. Neural basis of sound pattern recognition in anurans. Progr Neurobiol 1990, 34:313-329.
18. Gooler D.M., Feng A.S. Temporal coding in the frog auditory midbrain-the influence of duration and rise-fall time on the processing of complex amplitude-modulated stimuli. J Neurophysiol 1992, 67:1-22.
19. Edwards C.J., Leary C.J., Rose G.J. Counting on inhibition and rate-dependent excitation in the auditory system. J Neurosci 2007, 27:13384-13392.
20. Edwards C.J., Leary C.J., Rose G.J. Mechanisms of long-interval selectivity in midbrain auditory neurons: roles of excitation, inhibition, and plasticity. J Neurophysiol 2008, 100:3407-3416.
21. Leary C.J, Edwards C.J., Rose G.J. Midbrain auditory neurons integrate excitation and inhibition to generate duration selectivity: an in vivo whole-cell patch study in anurans. J Neurosci 2008, 28:5481-5493.
22. Rose G.J., Brenowitz E.A. Pacific treefrogs use temporal integration to differentiate advertisement from encounter calls. Anim Behav 2002, 63:1183-1190.
23. Covey E. Neural population coding and auditory temporal pattern analysis. Physiol Behav 2000, 69:211-220.
24. Dean I., Harper N.S., McAlpine D. Neural population coding of sound level adapts to stimulus statistics. Nat Neurosci 2005, 8:1684-1689.
25. Miller L.M., Recanzone G.H. Populations of auditory cortical neurons can accurately encode acoustic space across stimulus intensity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:5931-5935.
26. Panzeri S., Pola G., Petersen R.S. Coding of sensory signals by neuronal populations: the role of correlated activity. Neuroscientist 2003, 9:175-180.
27. Panzeri S., Pola G., Petroni F., Young M.P., Petersen R.S. A critical assessment of different measures of the information carried by correlated neuronal firing. Biosystems 2002, 67:177-185.
28. Petersen R.S., Panzeri S., Diamond M.E. Population coding in somatosensory cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2002, 12:441-447.
29. Petersen R.S., Panzeri S., Diamond M.E. Population coding of stimulus location in rat somatosensory cortex. Neuron 2001, 32:503-514.
30. Burmeister S.S., Mangiamele L.A., Lebonville C.L. Acoustic modulation of immediate early gene expression in the auditory midbrain of female túngara frogs. Brain Res 2008, 1190:105-114.
31. Hoke K.L., Burmeister S.S., Fernald R.D., Rand A.S., Ryan M.J., Wilczynski W. Functional mapping of the auditory midbrain during mate call reception. J Neurosci 2004, 24:11264-11272.
32. Clayton D.F. The genomic action potential. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2000, 74:185-216.
33. Damoiseaux J.S., Greicius M.D. Greater than the sum of its parts: a review of studies combining structural connectivity and resting-state functional connectivity. Brain Struct Funct 2009, 213:525-533.
34. Greicius M.D., Krasnow B., Reiss A.L., Menon V. Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100:253-258.
35. Honey C.J., Kotter R., Breakspear M., Sporns O. Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:10240-10245.
36. Honey C.J., Sporns O., Cammoun L., Gigandet X., Thiran J.P., Meuli R., Hagmann P. Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:2035-2040.
37. Schiltz C.A., Bremer Q.Z., Landry C.F., Kelley A.E. Food-associated cues alter forebrain functional connectivity as assessed with immediate early gene and proenkephalin expression. BMC Biol 2007, 5:1-20.
38. Hoke K.L., Ryan M.J., Wilczynski W. Integration of sensory and motor processing underlying social behaviour in túngara frogs. Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci 2007, 274:641-649.
39. Hoke K.L., Ryan M.J., Wilczynski W. Social cues shift functional connectivity in the hypothalamus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102:10712-10717.
40. Searcy W.A., Brenowitz E.A. Sexual differences in species recognition of avian song. Nature 1988, 332:152-154.
41. Wiley R.H. Signal detection and animal communication. Adv Stud Behav 2006, 36:217-247.
42. Baugh A.T., Ryan M.J. Mate choice in response to dynamic presentation of male advertisement signals in túngara frogs. Anim Behav 2010, 79:145-152.
43. Bernal X.E., Akre K.L., Baugh A.T., Rand A.S., Ryan M.J. Female and male behavioral response to advertisement calls of graded complexity in túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2009, 63:1269-1279.
44. Bernal X.E., Rand A.S., Ryan M.J. Sex differences in response to nonconspecific advertisement calls: receiver permissiveness in male and female túngara frogs. Anim Behav 2007, 73:955-964.
45. Bernal X.E., Rand A.S., Ryan M.J. Sexual differences in the behavioral response of túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus, to cues associated with increased predation risk. Ethology 2007, 113:755-763.
46. Hoke K.L., Ryan M.J., Wilczynski W. Functional coupling between substantia nigra and basal ganglia homologues in amphibians. Behav Neurosci 2007, 121:1393-1399.
47. Hoke KL, Ryan MJ, Wilczynski W: Sexually dimorphic sensory gating drives behavioral differences in túngara frogs. J Exp Biol 2010:in press, doi:10.1242/JEB.043992.
48. Mangiamele L.A., Burmeister S.S. Acoustically-evoked immediate-early gene expression in the pallium of the túngara from. Brain Behav Evol 2008, 72:239-250.
49. Hoke K.L., Ryan M.J., Wilczynski W. Candidate neural locus for sex differences in reproductive decisions. Biol Lett 2008, 4:518-521.
50. Emerson S.B., Boyd S.K. Mating vocalizations of female frogs: control and evolutionary mechanisms. Brain Behav Evol 1999, 53:187-197.
51. Zornik E., Yamaguchi A. Sexually differentiated central pattern generators in Xenopus laevis. Trends Neurosci 2008, 31:296-302.
52. Kimchi T., Xu J., Dulac C. A functional circuit underlying male sexual behaviour in the female mouse brain. Nature 2007, 448:1009-1014.
53. Lea J., Halliday T., Dyson M. Reproductive stage and history affect the phonotactic preferences of female midwife toads, Alytes muletensis. Anim Behav 2000, 60:423-427.
54. Lynch K.S., Crews D., Ryan M.J., Wilczynski W. Hormonal state influences aspects of female mate choice in the túngara frog (Physalaemus pustulosus). Horm Behav 2006, 49:450-457.
55. Lynch K.S., Wilczynski W. Reproductive hormones modify reception of species-typical communication signals in a female anuran. Brain Behav Evol 2008, 71:143-150.
56. Miranda J.A., Wilczynski W. Female reproductive state influences the auditory midbrain response. J Comp Physiol A: Neuroethol Sensory Neur Behav Physiol 2009, 195:341-349.
57. Goense J.B.M., Feng A.S. Seasonal changes in frequency tuning and temporal processing in single neurons in the frog auditory midbrain. J Neurobiol 2005, 65:22-36.
58. Ryan M.J. Synchronized calling in a treefrog (Smilisca sila). Brain Behav Evol 1986, 29:196-206.
59. Bass A.H., McKibben J.R. Neural mechanisms and behaviors for acoustic communication in teleost fish. Progr Neurobiol 2003, 69:1-26.
60. Bodner D.A., Bass A.H. Midbrain combinatorial code for temporal and spectral information in concurrent acoustic signals. J Neurophysiol 1999, 81:552-563.
61. Bodner D.A., Bass A.H. Temporal coding of concurrent acoustic signals in auditory midbrain. J Neurosci 1997, 17:7553-7564.
62. Maruska K.P., Tricas T.C. Encoding properties of auditory neurons in the brain of a soniferous damselfish: response to simple tones and complex conspecific signals. J Comp Physiol A: Neuroethol Sensory Neur Behav Physiol 2009, 195:1071-1088.
63. Forlano P.M., Deitcher D.L., Bass A.R.H. Distribution of estrogen receptor alpha mRNA in the brain and inner ear of a vocal fish with comparisons to sites of aromatase expression. J Comp Neurol 2005, 483:91-113.