Sensitivity of the human binaural cortical steady state response to interaural level differences

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 114-120

  Massoud, Sarah ^a   Aiken, Steve J ^a   Newman, Aaron J ^a   Phillips, Dennis P ^a   Bance, Manohar ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; DICHOTIC LISTENING; EVOKED RESPONSE AUDIOMETRY; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REFERENCE VALUE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AUDIOMETRY, EVOKED RESPONSE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; DICHOTIC LISTENING TESTS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; REFERENCE VALUES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78651408058     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181ec5d7a     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Bernstein, L. R., & Trahiotis, C. (1992). Discrimination of interaural envelope correlation and its relation to binaural unmasking in the high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am, 91, 306-316.
2. Blauert, J., & Lindemann, W. (1986). Spatial mapping of intracranial auditory events for various degrees of interaural coherence. J Acoust Soc Am, 79, 806-813.
3. Blodgett, H. C., Jeffress, L. A., Whitworth, R. H. (1962). Effect of noise at one ear on the masked threshold for tone at the other. J Acoust Soc Am, 34, 979-981.
4. Bocca, E., & Antonelli, A. R. (1976). Masking level difference: Another tool for the evaluation of peripheral and cortical defects. Audiology, 15, 480-487.
5. Boehnke, S. E., Hall, S. E., Marquardt, T. (2002). Detection of static and dynamic changes in interaural correlation. J Acoust Soc Am, 112, 1617-1626.
6. Boothroyd, A. (2006). Characteristics of listening environments: Benefits of binaural hearing and implications for bilateral management. Int J Audiol, 45, S12-S19.
7. Bronkhorst, A. W., & Plomp, R. (1989). Binaural speech intelligibility in noise for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 86, 1374-1383. (Pubitemid 19270986)
8. Browning, G. G. (1993). Reporting the benefits from middle ear surgery using the Glasgow Benefit Plot. Am J Otol, 14, 135-140.
9. Browning, G. G., Gatehouse, S., Swan, I. R. (1991). The Glasgow Benefit Plot: A new method for reporting benefits from middle ear surgery. Laryngoscope, 101, 180-185.
10. Chait, M., Poeppel, D., de Cheveigné, A., et al. (2005). Human auditory cortical processing of changes in interaural correlation. J Neurosci, 25, 8518-8527.
11. Culling, J. F., Colburn, H. S., Spurchise, M. (2001). Interaural correlation sensitivity. J Acoust Soc Am, 110, 1020-1029.
12. Dajani, H. R., & Picton, T. W. (2006). Human auditory steady-state responses to changes in interaural correlation. Hear Res, 219, 85-100.
13. Durlach, N. I., Braida, L. D., Ito, Y. (1986). Towards a model for discrimination of broadband signals. J Acoust Soc Am, 80, 63-73.
14. Durlach, N. I., Gabriel, K. J., Colburn, H. S., et al. (1986). Interaural correlation discrimination. II. Relation to binaural unmasking. J Acoust Soc Am, 79, 1548-1557.
15. Durlach, N. I., Thompson, C. L., Colburn, H. S. (1981). Binaural interaction of impaired listeners. A review of past research. Audiology, 20, 181-211.
16. Gatehouse, S., & Akeroyd, M. (2006). Two-eared listening in dynamic situations. Int J Audiol, 45, S120-S124.
17. Gatehouse, S., & Noble, W. (2004). The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale. Int J Audiol, 43, 85-99.
18. Halliday, R., & Callaway, E. (1978). Time shift evoked potentials (TSEPs): Method and basic results. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol, 45, 118-121.
19. Hari, R., Aittoniemi, K., Järvinen, M. L., et al. (1980). Auditory evoked transient and sustained magnetic fields of the human brain localization of neural generators. Exp Brain Res, 40, 237-240.
20. Häusler, R., Colburn, S., Marr, E. (1983). Sound localization in subjects with impaired hearing. Spatial discrimination and interaural- discrimination tests. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl, 400, 1-62.
21. Jain, M., Gallagher, D. T., Koehnke, J., et al. (1991). Fringed correlation discrimination and binaural detection. J Acoust Soc Am, 90, 1918-1926.
22. Koehnke, J., Colburn, H. S., Durlach, N. I. (1986). Performance in several binaural-interaction experiments. J Acoust Soc Am, 79, 1558-1562.
23. Koehnke, J., Culotta, C. P., Hawley, M. L., et al. S. (1995). Effects of reference interaural time and intensity differences on binaural performance in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. Ear Hear, 16, 331-353.
24. Krumbholz, K., Magezi, D. A., Moore, R. C. (2009). Binaural sluggishness precludes temporal pitch processing based on envelope cues in conditions of binaural unmasking. J Acoust Soc Am, 125, 1067-1074.
25. McEvoy, L. K., Picton, T. W., Champagne, S. C., et al. (1990). Human evoked potentials to shifts in the lateralization of a noise. Audiology, 29, 163-180.
26. Moore, D. R. (1991). Anatomy and physiology of binaural hearing. Audiology, 30, 125-134.
27. Näätänen, R., & Picton, T. (1987). The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiol, 24, 375-425.
28. Nia, J., & Bance, M. (2001). Effects of varying unilateral conductive hearing losses on speech-in-noise discrimination: An experimental study with implications for surgical correction. Otol Neurotol, 22, 737-744.
29. Olsen, W. O., Noffsinger, D., Carhart, R. (1976). Masking level differences encountered in clinical populations. Audiology, 15, 287-301.
30. Phillips, D. P. (2008). A perceptual architecture for sound lateralization in man. Hear Res, 238, 124-132.
31. Picton, T. W., Dimitrijevic, A., Perez-Abalo, M., et al. (2005). Estimating audiometric thresholds using auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 140-156.
32. Picton, T. W., McEvoy, L. K., Champagne, S. C. (1991). Human evoked potentials and the lateralization of sound. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl, 491, 139-144.
33. Quaranta, A., & Cervellera, G. (1974). Masking level difference in normal and pathological ears. Audiology, 13, 428-431.
34. Ross, B. (2008). A novel type of auditory responses: Temporal dynamics of 40-Hz steady-state responses induced by changes in sound localization. J Neurophysiol, 100, 1265-1277.
35. Scherg, M., Vajsar, J., Picton, T. W. (1989). A source analysis of the late human auditory evoked potentials. J Cog Neurosci, 1, 336-355.
36. Smyth, G. D., & Patterson, C. C. (1985). Results of middle ear reconstruction: Do patients and surgeons agree? Am J Otol, 6, 276-279.
37. Toner, J. G., & Smyth, G. D. (1993). Comparison of methods of evaluating hearing benefit of middle ear surgery. J Laryngol Otol, 107, 4-5.
38. Wilson, J. R., & Krishnan, A. (2005). Human frequency-following responses to binaural masking level difference stimuli. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 184-195.
39. Wilson, M. J., Kelly-Ballweber, D., Dobie, R. A. (1985). Binaural interaction in auditory brainstem responses: Parametric studies. Ear Hear, 6, 80-88.
40. Wong, W. Y. S., & Stapells, D. R. (2004). Brain stem and cortical mechanisms underlying binaural masking level differences in humans: An auditory steady-state response study. Ear Hear, 25, 57-67.
41. Yin, T. C. T., Chan, J. C. K., Irvine, D. R. F. (1986). Effects of interaural time delays of noise stimuli on low-frequency cells in the cat's inferior colliculus. I. Responses to wideband noise. J Neurophysiol, 55, 280-300.