Sum rule for response function in nonequilibrium Langevin systems

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 82, Issue 5, 2010, Pages

  Yuge, Tatsuro ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HAMILTONIAN SYSTEMS; LANGEVIN; LANGEVIN MODELS; LINEAR RESPONSE; NON EQUILIBRIUM; NON-EQUILIBRIUM STEADY STATE; RESPONSE FUNCTIONS; SUM RULE;

ENERGY DISSIPATION; HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS;

HAMILTONIANS;

EID: 78651380846     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.82.051130     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. R. Kubo, M. Toda, and N. Hashitsume, Statistical Physics II: Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991).
2. T. Harada and S.-i. Sasa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 130602 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.130602 (Pubitemid 41505565)
3. T. Harada and S.-i. Sasa, Phys. Rev. E 73, 026131 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.026131
4. T. Speck and U. Seifert, Europhys. Lett. 74, 391 (2006). 10.1209/epl/i2005-10549-4 (Pubitemid 43681391)
5. V. Lucarini, J. Stat. Phys. 131, 543 (2008). 10.1007/s10955-008-9498-y
6. J. Prost, J.-F. Joanny, and J. M. R. Parrondo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 090601 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.090601
7. M. Baiesi, C. Maes, and B. Wynants, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 010602 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.010602
8. M. Baiesi, C. Maes, and B. Wynants, J. Stat. Phys. 137, 1094 (2009). 10.1007/s10955-009-9852-8
9. M. Baiesi, E. Boksenbojm, C. Maes, and B. Wynants, J. Stat. Phys. 139, 492 (2010). 10.1007/s10955-010-9951-6
10. D. Villamaina, A. Baldassarri, A. Puglisi, and A. Vulpiani, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. (2009), P07024. 10.1088/1742-5468/2009/07/P07024
11. M. Krüger and M. Fuchs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 135701 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.135701
12. A. Shimizu and T. Yuge, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 79, 013002 (2010). 10.1143/JPSJ.79.013002
13. H. Fujisaki and A. Shimizu, Phys. Rev. A 57, 3074 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevA.57.3074
14. C. W. Gardiner, Handbook of Stochastic Methods for Physics, Chemistry, and the Natural Sciences (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004).
15. K. Sekimoto, Stochastic Energetics (Springer, Berlin, 2010).
16. From the viewpoint that the overdamped model is an approximate one of a certain Hamiltonian model, the infinite value of the sum in the overdamped model implies the violation of the sum rule because it must be finite in Hamiltonian systems. Furthermore, since all the systems in experiments are described by Hamiltonian systems (if the degrees of freedom in sufficiently large environments are included), it should be experimentally verified (e.g., in experiments of the Brownian motion of a bead in air) that the overdamped model gives an incorrect result about the sum rule.
17. T. Li, S. Kheifets, D. Medellin, and M. G. Raizen, Science 328, 1673 (2010). 10.1126/science.1189403
18. K. Sekimoto, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 66, 1234 (1997). 10.1143/JPSJ.66.1234
19. H. Hasegawa and T. Nakagomi, J. Stat. Phys. 21, 191 (1979). 10.1007/BF01008698
20. This equivalence was pointed out also in their original paper.
21. T. Yuge, N. Ito, and A. Shimizu, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 74, 1895 (2005). 10.1143/JPSJ.74.1895 (Pubitemid 41276837)
22. T. Yuge and A. Shimizu, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 178, 64 (2009). 10.1143/PTPS.178.64
23. T. Yuge (unpublished).
24. J. M. Deutsch and O. Narayan, Phys. Rev. E 74, 026112 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.026112
25. T. Ohkuma and T. Ohta, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. (2007), P10010. 10.1088/1742-5468/2007/10/P10010
26. A. Shimizu, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 79, 113001 (2010). 10.1143/JPSJ.79.113001