Reproducibility and comparison of retinal thickness and volume measurements in normal eyes determined with two different cirrus oct scanning protocols

Retina

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 41-47

  Hagen, Stefan ^a   Krebs, Ilse ^a   Haas, Paulina ^a   Glittenberg, Carl ^a   Falkner Radler, Christiane I ^a   Graf, Alexandra ^b   Ansari Shahrezaei, Siamak ^a,c   Binder, Susanne ^a  

^a KRANKENANSTALT RUDOLFSTIFTUNG   (Austria)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

comparison; optical coherence tomography; reproducibility; retinal thickness; retinal volume; scanning protocols

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETINA; RETINA MACULA LUTEA;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MACULA LUTEA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETINA; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE;

EID: 78651369035     PISSN: 0275004X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181dde71e     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science 1991;254:1178-1181.
2. Srinivasan VJ,Wojtkowski M,Witkin AJ, et al. High-definition and 3-dimensional imaging of macular pathologies with highspeed ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2006;113:2054. e1-14.
3. Monson BK, Greenberg PB, Greenberg E, et al. High-speed, ultra-high-resolution optical coherence tomography of acute macular neuroretinopathy. Br Ophthalmol 2007;91:119-120.
4. Muscat S, Parks S, Kemp E, Keating D. Repeatability and reproducibility of macular thickness measurements with the Humphrey OCT system. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43: 490-495. (Pubitemid 34113233)
5. Browning DJ, Fraser CM, Propst BW. The variation in optical coherence tomography-measured macular thickness in diabetic eyes without clinical macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol 2008; 145:889-893.
6. Patel PJ, Chen FK, Ikeji F, Xing W, Bunce C, Da Cruz L, et al. Repeatability of stratus optical coherence tomography measures in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:1084-1088.
7. Paunescu LA, Schuman JS, Price LL, Stark PC, Beaton S, Ishikawa H, et al. Reproducibility of nerve fiber thickness, macular thickness, and optic nerve head measurements using StratusOCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:1716-1724.
8. Massin P, Vicaut E, Haouchine B, et al. Reproducibility of retinal mapping using optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:1135-1142.
9. Barkana Y, Burgansky-Eliash Z, Gerber Y, Melamed S, Neudorfer M, Avni I, et al. Inter-device variability of the Stratus optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 2009; 147:260-266.
10. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Report No. 1. Arch Ophthalmol 1985;103:1796-1806.
11. Forooghian F, Cukras C, Meyerle CB, et al. Evaluation of time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in the measurement of diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:4290-4296.
12. Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN, Lee G, Lin D, Pang CP, et al. Comparison of macular thickness measurements between time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:4893-4897.
13. Polito A, Del Borrello M, Isola M, Zemella N, Bandello F. Repeatability and reproducibility of fast macular thickness mapping with stratus optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:1330-1337.
14. Wang XY, Huynh SC, Burlutsky G, Ip J, Stapleton F, Mitchell P. Reproducibility of and effect of magnification on optical coherence tomography measurements in children. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:484-488.
15. Eriksson U, Alm A. Repeatability in and interchangeability between the macular and the fast macular thickness map protocols: A study on normal eyes with Stratus optical coherence tomography. Acta Ophthalmol 2008 [Epub ahead of print].
16. Menke MN, Dabov S, Knecht P, Sturm V. Reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements in healthy subjects using spectralis optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;147:467-472.
17. Kiernan DF, Hariprasad SM, Chin EK, Kiernan CL, Rago J, Mieler WF. Prospective comparison of cirrus and stratus optical coherence tomography for quantifying retinal thickness. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;147:267-275.
18. Krebs I, Falkner-Radler C, Hagen S, Haas P, Brannath W, Lie S, et al. Quality of the threshold algorithm in age-related macular degeneration: Stratus versus Cirrus OCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:995-1000.
19. van Velthoven ME, van der Linden MH, de Smet MD, Faber DJ, Verbraak FD. Influence of cataract on optical coherence tomography image quality and retinal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:1259-1262.
20. Cheung CY, Leung CK, Lin D, Pang CP, Lam DS. Relationship between retinal nerve fiber layer measurement and signal strength in optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1347-1351, 1351. e1-2.