What can quantum theory bring to information retrieval?

International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 59-68

  Piwowarski, Benjamin ^a   Frommholz, Ingo ^a   Lalmas, Mounia ^a   Van Rijsbergen, Keith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Model; Quantum theory

Indexed keywords

AD-HOC RETRIEVAL TASKS; DENSITY OPERATORS; INFORMATION NEED; PROBABILISTIC FORMALISM; QUANTUM PHYSICS; RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; STATE VECTOR; TENSOR SPACES; USER INFORMATION NEED; USER INTERACTION; WEIGHTED SET;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION SCIENCE; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; VECTOR SPACES; VECTORS;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 78651324881     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1871437.1871450     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. J. Allan. Relevance feedback with too much data. In SIGIR. ACM, 1995.
2. P. Belhumeur, J. Hespanha, and D. Kriegman. Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: recognition using class specific linear projection. IEEE TPAMI, 19(7), 1997.
3. C. Burgess, K. Livesay, and K. Lund. Explorations in context space: Words, sentences, discourse. Discourse Processes, 2-3, 1998.
4. L. Che, J. Zen, and N. Tokud. A "stereo" document representation for textual information retrieval. JASIST, 5, 2006.
5. C. L. Clarke, M. Kolla, G. V. Cormack, O. Vechtomova, A. Ashkan, S. Büttcher, and I. MacKinnon. Novelty and diversity in information retrieval evaluation. In SIGIR. ACM, 2008.
6. S. Deerwester, S. Dumais, G. Furnas, and T. Landauer. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. JASIST, 41(6), 1990.
7. M. D. Dunlop. The effect of accessing nonmatching documents on relevance feedback. ACM TOIS, 15(2), 1997.
8. P. Ingwersen and K. Järvelin. The Turn: Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context (The Information Retrieval Series). Springer-Verlag, 2005.
9. M. Melucci. A basis for information retrieval in context. ACM TOIS, 26(3), 2008.
10. D. Metzler and W. B. Croft. Combining the language model and inference network approaches to retrieval. IPM, 40(5), 2004.
11. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang. Quantum computation and quantum information. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
12. B. Piwowarski, I. Frommholz, M. Lalmas, and K. van Rijsbergen. Exploring a multidimensional representation of documents and queries. In RIAO, 2010.
13. B. Piwowarski, I. Frommholz, Y. Moshfeghi, M. Lalmas, and K. van Rijsbergen. Filtering documents with subspaces. In ECIR, 2010.
14. B. Piwowarski and M. Lalmas. A quantum-based model for interactive information retrieval. In ICTIR, 2009.
15. S. Robertson and H. Zaragoza. The probabilistic relevance framework: BM25 and beyond. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 3(4), 2009.
16. C. J. van Rijsbergen. The Geometry of Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press, 2004.
17. X. Wang, H. Fang, and C. Zhai. A study of methods for negative relevance feedback. In SIGIR. ACM, 2008.
18. X. Wei and W. B. Croft. Lda-based document models for ad-hoc retrieval. In SIGIR. ACM, 2006.
19. H. I. Xie. Shifts of interactive intentions and information-seeking strategies in interactive information retrieval. JASIS, 51(9), 2000.
20. X. Yin, X. Huang, and Z. Li. Promoting Ranking Diversity for Biomedical Information Retrieval Using Wikipedia. In ECIR. Springer, 2010.
21. C. X. Zhai, W. W. Cohen, and J. Lafferty. Beyond independent relevance: methods and evaluation metrics for subtopic retrieval. In SIGIR. ACM, 2003.
22. G. Zuccon and L. Azzopardi. Using the Quantum Probability Ranking Principle to Rank Interdependent Documents. In ECIR. Springer, 2010.
23. G. Zuccon, L. Azzopardi, and C. J. van Rijsbergen. Semantic spaces: Measuring the distance between different subspaces. In QI, 2009.