Association of creatin kinase B and peroxiredoxin 2 expression with age and embryo quality in cumulus cells

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Volumn 27, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 629-639

  Lee, Maw Sheng ^a,b,c,d   Liu, Chung Hsien ^d   Lee, Tsung Hsien ^a,c   Wu, Hui Mei ^c   Huang, Chun Chia ^c,e   Huang, Lii Shung ^a,c   Chen, Chuan Mu ^f   Cheng, En Hui ^a  

^a CHUNG SHAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b CHINA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c Lee Women's Hospital   (Taiwan)

^d CHUNG SHAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^e CENTRAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^f NATIONAL CHUNG HSING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Aging; Creatin kinase B (CKB); Cumulus cells; Embryo quality; Peroxiredoxin 2 (PRDX2)

Indexed keywords

CREATIN KINASE B; PEROXIREDOXIN 2; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; APOPTOSIS; ARTICLE; CELL AGING; CELL CYCLE REGULATION; CELL METABOLISM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CUMULUS CELL; EMBRYO; EMBRYO QUALITY; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; OOCYTE; OVULATION; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; QUALITY CONTROL; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; UPREGULATION;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CREATINE KINASE, BB FORM; CUMULUS CELLS; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; HUMANS; PEROXIREDOXINS; UP-REGULATION;

EID: 78651316271     PISSN: 10580468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-010-9459-7     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Borini A, Lagalla C, Cattoli M, Sereni E, Sciajno R, Flamigni C, et al. Predictive factors for embryo implantation potential. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;10:653-68.
2. Gerris JM. Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11:105-21.
3. van Montfoort AP, Geraedts JP, Dumoulin JC, Stassen AP, Evers JL, Ayoubi TA. Differential gene expression in cumulus cells as a prognostic indicator of embryo viability: a microarray analysis. Mol Hhum Reprod. 2008;14:157-68.
4. Eppig JJ. The relationship between cumulus cell-oocyte coupling, oocyte meiotic maturation, and cumulus expansion. Dev Biol. 1982;89:268-72.
5. Eppig JJ. Intercommunication between mammalian oocytes and companion somatic cells. Bioessays. 1991;13:569-74.
6. Tanghe S, Van Soom A, Nauwynck H, Coryn M, de Kruif A. Functions of the cumulus oophorus during oocyte maturation, ovulation, and fertilization. Mol Reprod Dev. 2002;61:414-24.
7. Thomas FH, Vanderhyden BC. Oocyte-granulosa cell interactions during mouse follicular development: Regulation of kit ligand expression and its role in oocyte growth. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2006;4:19-26.
8. Cecconi S, Tatone C, Buccione R, Mangia F, Colonna R. Granulosa cell-oocyte interactions: the phosphorylation of specific proteins in mouse oocytes at the germinal vesicle stage is dependent upon the differentiative state of companion somatic cells. J Exp Zool. 1991;258:249-54.
9. Eppig JJ, Chesnel F, Hirao Y, O'Brien MJ, Pendola FL, Watanabe S, et al. Oocyte control of granulosa cell development: how and why. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:127-32.
10. Chang H, Brown CW, Matzuk MM. Genetic analysis of the mammalian transforming growth factor-beta superfamily. Endocr Rev. 2002;23:787-823.
11. Vanderhyden BC, Macdonald EA, Nagyova E, Dhawan A. Evaluation of members of the TGF beta superfamily as candidates for the oocyte factors that control mouse cumulus expansion and steroidogenesis. Reprod. 2003;61:55-70.
12. Faddy MJ, Gosden RG, Gougeon A, Richardson SJ, Nelson JF. Accelerated disappearance of ovarian follicles in mid-life: implications for forecasting menopause. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:1342-6.
13. te Velde E, Pearson P. The variability of female reproductive aging. Hum Reprod Update. 2002;8:141-54.
14. Janny L, Menezo YJ. Maternal age effect on early human embryonic development and blastocyst formation. Mol Reprod Devel. 1996;45:31-7.
15. Navot D, Bergh PA, Williams MA, Garrisi GJ, Guzman I, Sandler B, et al. Poor oocyte quality rather than implantation failure as a cause of age-related decline in female fertility. Lancet. 1991;337:1375-7.
16. Bassil S, Wyns C, Toussaint-Demylle D, Abdelnour W, Donnez J. Predictive factors of multiple pregnancy in in vitro fertilization. J Reprode Med. 1997;42:761-6.
17. Lin DP, Huang CC, Wu HM, Cheng TC, Chen CI, Lee MS. Comparison of mitochondrial DNA contents in human embryos with good or poor morphology at the 8-cell stage. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:73-9.
18. Zhang X, Jafari N, Barnes RB, Confino E, Milad M, Kazer RR. Studies of gene expression in human cumulus cells indicate pentraxin 3 as a possible marker for oocyte quality. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1169-79.
19. Hamel M, Dufort I, Robert C, Gravel C, Leveille MC, Leader A, et al. Identification of differentially expressed markers in human follicular cells associated with competent oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1118-27.
20. McKenzie LJ, Pangas SA, Carson SA, Kovanci E, Cisneros P, Buster JE, et al. Human cumulus granulosa cell gene expression: a predictor of fertilization and embryo selection in women undergoing IVF. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2869-74.
21. Assou S, Haouzi D, Mahmoud K, Aouacheria A, Guillemin Y, Pantesco V, et al. A non-invasive test for assessing embryo potential by gene expression profiles of human cumulus cells: a proof of concept study. Mol Hum Reprod. 2008;14:711-9.
22. Sutton ML, Gilchrist RB, Thompson JG. Effects of in-vivo and invitro environments on the metabolism of the cumulus-oocyte complex and its influence on oocyte developmental capacity. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9:35-48.
23. Rolf C, Behre HM, Cooper TG, Koppers B, Nieschlag E. Creatine kinase activity in human spermatozoa and seminal plasma lacks predictive value for male fertility in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:727-34.
24. Yoshida S, Yashar BM, Hiriyanna S, Swaroop A. Microarray analysis of gene expression in the aging human retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;4:2554-60.
25. Zarghami N, Yu H, Diamandis EP, Sutherland DJ. Quantification of creatine kinase BB isoenzyme in tumor cytosols and serum with an ultrasensitive time-resolved immunofluorometric technique. Clin Biochem. 1995;28:243-53.
26. Huddleston HG, Wong KK, Welch WR, Berkowitz RS, Mok SC. Clinical applications of microarray technology: creatine kinase B is an up-regulated gene in epithelial ovarian cancer and shows promise as a serum marker. Gyneol Oncol. 2005;96:77-83.
27. Wu-Peng XS, Pugliese TE, Dickerman HW, Pentecost BT. Delineation of sites mediating estrogen regulation of the rat creatine kinase B gene. Mol Endocri. 1992;6:231-40.
28. Zarghami N, Giai M, Yu H, Roagna R, Ponzone R, Katsaros D, et al. Creatine kinase BB isoenzyme levels in tumour cytosols and survival of breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 1996;73:386-90.
29. Bergen HT, Pentecost BT, Dickerman HW, Pfaff DW. In situ hybridization for creatine kinase-B messenger RNA in rat uterus and brain. Mol Cellular Endocrinol. 1993;92:111-9.
30. Welt CK, Jimenez Y, Sluss PM, Smith PC, Hall JE. Control of estradiol secretion in reproductive ageing. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:2189-93.
31. Iyengar MR, Iyengar CW, Chen HY, Brinster RL, Bornslaeger E, Schultz RM. Expression of creatine kinase isoenzyme during oogenesis and embryogenesis in the mouse. Dev Biol. 1983;96:263-8.
32. Chorfi Y, Lanevschi A, Dupras R, Girard V, Tremblay A. Serum biochemical parameters and embryo production during superovulatory treatment in dairy cattle. Res Vet Sci. 2007;83:318-21.
33. de Bruin JP, Dorland M, Spek ER, Posthuma G, van Haaften M, Looman CW, et al. Age-related changes in the ultrastructure of the resting follicle pool in human ovaries. Biol Reprod. 2004;70:419-24.
34. Aitken RJ, Buckingham DW, Carreras A, Irvine DS. Superoxide dismutase in human sperm suspensions: relationship with cellular composition, oxidative stress, and sperm function. Free Radic Biol Med. 1996;21:495-504.
35. Wood ZA, Schröder E, Robin HJ, Poole LB. Structure, mechanism and regulation of peroxiredoxins. Trends Biochem Sci. 2003;28:32-40.
36. Kim H, Lee TH, Park ES, Suh JM, Park SJ, Chung HK, et al. Role of peroxiredoxins in regulating intracellular hydrogen peroxide and hydrogen peroxide induced apoptosis in thyroid cells. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:18266-70.
37. Leyens G, Knoops B, Donnay I. Expression of peroxiredoxins in bovine oocytes and embryos produced in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev. 2004;69:243-51.
38. Agarwal A, Gupta S, Sharma RK. Role of oxidative stress in female reproduction. Reprode Biol Endocrnol. 2005;14:28-49.
39. Vega M, Carrasco I, Castillo T, Troncoso JL, Videla LA, Devoto L. Functional luteolysis in response to hydrogen peroxide in human luteal cells. J Endocrinol. 1995;147:177-82.
40. van Montfoort APA, Geraedts JPM, Dumoulin JCM, Stassen APM, Johannes LH, Evers JLH, et al. Differential gene expression in cumulus cells as a prognostic indicator of embryo viability: a microarray analysis. MHR-Basic Science of Reproductive Medicine. 2008;14:157-68.
41. Adriaenssens T, Wathlet S, Segers I, Verheyen G, De Vos A, Van der Elst J, et al. Cumulus cell gene expression is associated with oocyte developmental quality and influenced by patient and treatment characteristics. Hum Reprod. 2010; 1:1-12.
42. Hall VJ, Compton D, Stojkovic P, Nesbitt M, Herbert M, Murdoch A, et al. Developmental competence of human in vitro aged oocytes as host cells for nuclear transfer. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:52-62.
43. Wang Q, Sun QY. Evaluation of oocyte quality: morphological, cellular and molecular predictors. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2007;19:1-12.
44. Lee KS, Joo BS, Na YJ, Yoon MS, Choi OH, Kim WW. Cumulus cells apoptosis as an indicator to predict the quality of oocytes and the outcome of IVF-ET. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2001;18:490-8.